A little while ago Neil turned me on to quickpkg. It sounds like a
great way to protect yourself from the new package blues. Is anyone
using it like that? What would be the best way to assure that your
system always has a backup copy of your current version of a package
available
On Sun, 2005-03-27 at 10:35 -0800, Grant wrote:
A little while ago Neil turned me on to quickpkg. It sounds like a
great way to protect yourself from the new package blues. Is anyone
using it like that? What would be the best way to assure that your
system always has a backup copy
On Sun, 27 Mar 2005 10:35:09 -0800, Grant wrote:
If I'm understanding it correctly, FEATURES=buildpkg sounds less
reliable for failed upgrade recovery. If you want to roll back to a
previous version of a package, you're going to end up with what was
originally installed, not what was working
If I'm understanding it correctly, FEATURES=buildpkg sounds less
reliable for failed upgrade recovery. If you want to roll back to a
previous version of a package, you're going to end up with what was
originally installed, not what was working on your system right before
the upgrade,
On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 17:13:09 -0800, Grant wrote:
A little while ago Neil turned me on to quickpkg. It sounds like a
great way to protect yourself from the new package blues. Is anyone
using it like that? What would be the best way to assure that your
system always has a backup copy of your
A little while ago Neil turned me on to quickpkg. It sounds like a
great way to protect yourself from the new package blues. Is anyone
using it like that? What would be the best way to assure that your
system always has a backup copy of your current version of a package
available before
On Thu, 2005-03-24 at 17:13 -0800, Grant wrote:
A little while ago Neil
Who's Neil? :-D
turned me on to quickpkg. It sounds like a
great way to protect yourself from the new package blues.
And you mean upgrades that didn't go smoothly??
Is anyone
using it like that? What would be the
quickpkg /var/db/pkg/dev-python/pyogg-1.1
This line is supposed to create a package for this installed ebuild and
I don't know why it isn't working...
--
live free() or die()
Jadex
signature.asc
Description: Esta parte del mensaje =?ISO-8859-1?Q?est=E1?= firmada digitalmente
I want to use quickpkg to build kde on my laptop and then install it on
my desktop using the binary package. The problem is kde is an eclass, so
how do I determine all the packages I need to build for kde?
Tom
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
On Monday 15 December 2003 12:24, Tom Hosiawa wrote:
I want to use quickpkg to build kde on my laptop and then install it on
my desktop using the binary package. The problem is kde is an eclass, so
how do I determine all the packages I need to build for kde?
kde is actually a package, but it
On Monday 15 December 2003 12:24, Tom Hosiawa wrote:
I want to use quickpkg to build kde on my laptop and then install it on
my desktop using the binary package. The problem is kde is an eclass, so
how do I determine all the packages I need to build for kde?
kde is actually a package,
11 matches
Mail list logo
