Thanks, that was it! Just opened the laptop after being slept overnight
on the new kernel - its on time! (well almost, now ive gotta fix (a
minute or so of) the hwclock drift I upset after all the fiddling I did)
Just a note that the changelog implies its an acpi fix, and this is on a
dell laptop
Thanks, this looks like it.
BillK
On Sat, 2005-02-05 at 23:53 +, Daniel Drake wrote:
> William Kenworthy wrote:
> > In this case, the hwclock is accurate, its the OS thats wrong! When I
> > sleep the laptop, on wakeup, the OS is varying times ahead of the
> > (correct) hwclock - ntp soon corr
William Kenworthy wrote:
In this case, the hwclock is accurate, its the OS thats wrong! When I
sleep the laptop, on wakeup, the OS is varying times ahead of the
(correct) hwclock - ntp soon corrects it and its back in sync again.
Is this with 2.6.10? If so, try upgrading to gentoo-dev-sources-2.6.
This one has me stumped. I am quite used to having problems with the
way gentoo sets up the clock and can usually fix them.
In this case, the hwclock is accurate, its the OS thats wrong! When I
sleep the laptop, on wakeup, the OS is varying times ahead of the
(correct) hwclock - ntp soon correct
