Re: [gentoo-user] update: c++ performance: gentoo, debian, window s

2003-11-24 Thread Leendert van den Berg
On Mon, 24 Nov 2003 16:44:27 -0600 Matt Garman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 at 08:44:44AM -0600, Van Eps, Nathan D. (James > Tower) wrote: > > That is weird. A compiler should generate the same code whether it is > > optimized or unoptimized. It would be interesting to hear an

Re: [gentoo-user] update: c++ performance: gentoo, debian, window s

2003-11-24 Thread Matt Garman
On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 at 08:44:44AM -0600, Van Eps, Nathan D. (James Tower) wrote: > That is weird. A compiler should generate the same code whether it is > optimized or unoptimized. It would be interesting to hear an > explanation from the gcc folk as to what causes this. I think it had more to do

RE: [gentoo-user] update: c++ performance: gentoo, debian, window s

2003-11-24 Thread Van Eps, Nathan D. (James Tower)
That is weird. A compiler should generate the same code whether it is optimized or unoptimized. It would be interesting to hear an explanation from the gcc folk as to what causes this. -Nathan -Original Message- From: Matt Garman A while back I posted a message talking about the perform