-- quoting Norbert Kamenicky --
Matthias F. Brandstetter wrote:
Hi all,
I have a question to all of you: What do you think, which would be the
best, ie. most secure access to a webserver, so that users can
update their sites?
Use jail (chrooted environment) + ssh
Matthias F. Brandstetter wrote:
Hi all,
I have a question to all of you: What do you think, which would be the
best, ie. most secure access to a webserver, so that users can update
their sites?
Use jail (chrooted environment) + ssh
emerge jail openssh
- snip -
noro
--
[EMAIL
-- quoting Daniel Wood --
What about WEBDAV on over https? Lock it down by 'Require User' or by
IP or by any other apache authentication scheme?
You can even use apache 'ALIAS' to create locations to directories which
are not strictly speaking under your docroot. Everything
Hi all,
I have a question to all of you: What do you think, which would be the
best, ie. most secure access to a webserver, so that users can update
their sites?
To be more specific: I can't allow ssh login for most of this users for
several reasons, that's why I set /bin/false as login shell
-
From: Matthias F. Brandstetter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 9:03 PM
Subject: [gentoo-user] which type of access to a webserver?
Hi all,
I have a question to all of you: What do you think, which would be the
best, ie. most secure access
-- quoting SN --
First SSH would be the best and most secure solution, you setup Apache
so that each user has his site in his homedir, and set the chroot for
each user is his home directory, they can update their site easily with
scp through ssh or with a windows scp client
What about WEBDAV on over https? Lock it down by 'Require User' or by
IP or by any other apache authentication scheme?
You can even use apache 'ALIAS' to create locations to directories which
are not strictly speaking under your docroot. Everything runs under
http/s and thus would avoid
