Finallyrunning TOP occurred to me and when I did, I saw a root
session running nanoand i could not recall having logged
in as root
and run nano any time in the past few days. But I can't rule
it out as I
almost certainly would have adjusted the host name of the
local portage
When I ran TOP, I found a root session was running nano - at 50% CPU -
continuously. This session would have survived at least 3 reboots.
This system is behind my firewall and I have no reason to think it has
been hacked.and why would nano be using 50% of the CPU anyway?
I've seen
On Mon, 2003-11-17 at 22:14, Alan wrote:
When I ran TOP, I found a root session was running nano - at 50% CPU -
continuously. This session would have survived at least 3 reboots.
This system is behind my firewall and I have no reason to think it has
been hacked.and why would nano
