A. R. wrote:
http://gentooexperimental.org/nt/
Nah!
--
ditto!
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
> http://gentooexperimental.org/nt/
>
> Nah!
It's got to be an april fool's joke...
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
I have to admit, it had me going for just a little while...
On Apr 1, 2005 8:05 AM, Leo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A. R. wrote:
>
> > http://gentooexperimental.org/nt/
> >
> >
> >
> >Nah!
> >--
> >
> >
> >
> ditto!
> --
> gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
>
>
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org m
Dave Nebinger wrote:
http://gentooexperimental.org/nt/
Nah!
It's got to be an april fool's joke...
Has to be. Why else would it use "NT" and "comercial-grade" in the same
paragraph?
--
Ted Ozolins(VE7TVO)
Westbank, B. C
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
> >It's got to be an april fool's joke...
> Has to be. Why else would it use "NT" and "comercial-grade" in the same
> paragraph?
Not really. Don't you know that
GENTOO == Gee Everyone NT's Object Oriented?
I'm not a programmer but I hear that Object Oriented programming makes
it trivial to por
Mark Knecht wrote:
It's got to be an april fool's joke...
Has to be. Why else would it use "NT" and "comercial-grade" in the same
paragraph?
I understand porting as the process of adapting a piece of useful code
so it works in a system it was not initially designed for. OO cod
Vineri 01 Aprilie 2005 18:03, A. R. a scris:
> http://gentooexperimental.org/nt/
nice one
--
Adi
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
It's a good joke:
# wget
http://www.gentooexperimental.org/nt/distfiles/stages/stage1-latest.tar.
bz2
--12:12:35--
http://www.gentooexperimental.org/nt/distfiles/stages/stage1-latest.tar.
bz2
=> `stage1-latest.tar.bz2'
Resolving www.gentooexperimental.org... 213.131.245.105
Connecting t
On Apr 1, 2005 11:59 AM, Mark Knecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >It's got to be an april fool's joke...
>
> > Has to be. Why else would it use "NT" and "comercial-grade" in the same
> > paragraph?
>
> Not really. Don't you know that
>
> GENTOO == Gee Everyone NT's Object Oriented?
>
> I'm n
On Apr 1, 2005, at 5:59 pm, Leo wrote:
Is the part about MS buying the posix interface it true? I can't
believe I fell for this even if just for the 5 minutes I though about
how useless running linux on the NT kernel would be.
I'd like to have that second sentence framed & hung on the wall of
e
Bradley:
I hope you're not making fun of the makarena, I happen to like it!
< with grin underneath!>
Chris:
& whyinhell would you want the NT kernel on your computer in the first
place?; worst of both worlds!:: Windoze crash/kernel & Linux crash/GUI?
Get Win4Lin & do it right: Linux bulletpro
Stroller wrote:
I'm not sure of the details, and whether the project is completed or
under development, but Microsoft do indeed intend that one should be
able to run Linux apps on their XP server products. I _think_ this is
via system calls rather than a virtual machine, but I don't really know
On April 1, 2005 08:33 am, quoth Ted Ozolins:
> Dave Nebinger wrote:
> >> http://gentooexperimental.org/nt/
> >>
> >>Nah!
> >
> >It's got to be an april fool's joke...
>
> Has to be. Why else would it use "NT" and "comercial-grade" in the same
> paragraph?
I'm not sure it is a joke. Windows
13 matches
Mail list logo
