Re: [gentoo-user] how to make esearch run agains overlay too

2006-09-04 Thread Donnie Berkholz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > How can I make esearch scan my overlay too? The esearch man page > makes no mention of overlay, and none of the options appear to allow > directing esearch to a separate portage. eix is smart enough to do this, and it's nearly a drop-in replacement. Thanks, Donnie s

Re: [gentoo-user] gcc upgrade: openldap/perl error...

2006-09-04 Thread Richard Fish
On 9/4/06, Jarry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I would like to send it, but this is *everything* that was in log-file. Nothing more. So where can I find those "lines above"? Probably in the output of the build. So you'll have to try building it again. -Richard -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing l

[gentoo-user] [ebuild] make ebuild use custom ./configure arg

2006-09-04 Thread reader
I'm trying to make my own ebuild of samba, jumping to latest release 23c. After creating the overlay and moving the current 23a there renamed as 23c. I'd like to make ebuild use one custom ./conifigure arg of my own creation. When I step thru the ebuild process with: digest unpack compile

Re: [gentoo-user] CHOST recursive problem

2006-09-04 Thread Dirk Heinrichs
Am Dienstag, 5. September 2006 05:18 schrieb ext Meino Christian Cramer: > I tried that (after doing a backup of my whole system), but failed as > soon gcc was needed, cause the corrected CHOST implies, that there is > gcc already there, which supports (at least by its name...) the "new" > CPU

Re: [gentoo-user] CHOST recursive problem

2006-09-04 Thread Jean-Marc Beaune
Hi,   Just a stupid question : What is bootstrap.sh used for ?   Thanks /JM  On 9/5/06, Paul Varner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Tue, 2006-09-05 at 05:18 +0200, Meino Christian Cramer wrote:> Hi,>>  due to my installation fault half a year ago, I have to change CHOST >  from i386* to i686* to be a

Re: [gentoo-user] How to downgrade X and its dependencies

2006-09-04 Thread don
On Mon, Sep 04, 2006 at 03:36:13PM -0500, Michael Sullivan wrote: > > Is the a fairly simple way to get them all downgraded to the version > > that works with xorg 6.9? If it were something less basic than X, I > > would just unmerege them all and re-emerge. But removing X will remove > > a lot o

Re: [gentoo-user] ATI Mobility TV-OUT

2006-09-04 Thread Nick Rout
On Mon, 2006-09-04 at 09:23 -0700, Mark Knecht wrote: > On 9/4/06, Grant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > 7) Note that this doesn't seem to be nearly as bad when I configure > > > the machines to use the CRT output. I'm going to investigatge buying > > > some sort of VGA->S-Video or Composite video

Re: [gentoo-user] gallery file integrity problem

2006-09-04 Thread Trenton Adams
Okay, thanks. On 9/4/06, Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Sun, 3 Sep 2006 23:55:11 -0600, Trenton Adams wrote: > I gett the following warning on step 2 of the www-apps/gallery-2.0.4 > installation. > > gallery file integrity Warning > - Modified files (1) > modules/ffmpeg/classes/

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: ttyS1 - ttyS3 file exists

2006-09-04 Thread Ted Ozolins
Francesco Talamona wrote: >On Sunday 03 September 2006 19:44, Ted Ozolins wrote: > > >>For several years I've had no reason to use any of the serial ports >>on this boxen. Now that I have a need for a fax setup, I find that >>they are borked. Looking over the error messages at boot up I noticed

Re: [gentoo-user] gcc upgrade: openldap/perl error...

2006-09-04 Thread Jarry
Richard Fish wrote: On 9/4/06, Jarry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: !!! If you need support, post the topmost build error, and the call stack if relevant. Do this. The actual error is some lines above in the actual configuration output. *NOT* the line that starts with !!! ERRROR. We need t

Re: [gentoo-user] CHOST recursive problem

2006-09-04 Thread Paul Varner
On Tue, 2006-09-05 at 05:18 +0200, Meino Christian Cramer wrote: > Hi, > > due to my installation fault half a year ago, I have to change CHOST > from i386* to i686* to be able to install gcc-4.1 & Co. since a > better CPU as i386* is needed. I am running an > AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Pr

[gentoo-user] how to make esearch run agains overlay too

2006-09-04 Thread reader
How can I make esearch scan my overlay too? The esearch man page makes no mention of overlay, and none of the options appear to allow directing esearch to a separate portage. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-user] CHOST recursive problem

2006-09-04 Thread Meino Christian Cramer
Hi, due to my installation fault half a year ago, I have to change CHOST from i386* to i686* to be able to install gcc-4.1 & Co. since a better CPU as i386* is needed. I am running an AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 3800+. As discussed previously it was suggested to change CHOST and

[gentoo-user] sane-backends driving me insane. O_O

2006-09-04 Thread Dale
Well, here we are again. Sane-backends gives me this error: > make[1]: Leaving directory > `/var/tmp/portage/sane-backends-1.0.18-r2/work/sane-backends-1.0.18/sanei' > making all in backend > make[1]: Entering directory > `/var/tmp/portage/sane-backends-1.0.18-r2/work/sane-backends-1.0.18/backend

Re: [gentoo-user] Getting Photos From A Digital Camera

2006-09-04 Thread Dale
Adrian wrote: > On Sun, 03 Sep 2006 16:06:32 -0500 > Dale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote the words: > > >>> >>> >> I had to copy a file over so that when you plug th e camera in it puts >> it in the right group and such. It has been a while and I'm not sure >> you have to do that any more.

Re: [gentoo-user] Getting Photos From A Digital Camera

2006-09-04 Thread darren kirby
quoth the Adrian: > Tho I did have to restart my computer before it took effect. I doubt it. Try logging out and back in next time... > > Adrian > -d -- darren kirby :: Part of the problem since 1976 :: http://badcomputer.org "...the number of UNIX installations has grown to 10, with more expe

Re: [gentoo-user] Getting Photos From A Digital Camera

2006-09-04 Thread Adrian
On Sun, 03 Sep 2006 16:06:32 -0500 Dale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote the words: > Robert Cernansky wrote: > > On Sun, 3 Sep 2006 13:13:51 -0700 Adrian > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >> Digikam works as well, when run as root. > >> > >> What file did you need to changer permissions on in

Re: [gentoo-user] splash for laptop

2006-09-04 Thread Iain Buchanan
On Mon, 2006-09-04 at 15:44 -0400, Timothy A. Holmes wrote: > Hi folks: > > I have a laptop with a 1440x900 display panel and I would really like to > use the Gentoo2006 (honeycomb) theme for my splash. How do I convert / > modify / whatever the graphic to be able to be used on my big display. H

Re: [gentoo-user] Suspend2-sources-2.6.17 stable.

2006-09-04 Thread Iain Buchanan
On Mon, 2006-09-04 at 14:52 -0700, Richard Fish wrote: > On 9/4/06, Matthew Dawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I was just wondering, does anyone know why suspend2-sources-2.6.17 not > > stable > > yet? And if anyone is using it, is it stable enough for general use? I've been using it ever sin

[gentoo-user] Question about net.ppp0 and layout

2006-09-04 Thread Walter Dnes
Error messages listed below, but not as clear as I would like. I'm doing an update, and running into problems with net-dialup/ppp, the second last file in the list. Before doing anything rash, like deleting files I need, I'd like to confirm whether I should do it. I do not have ppp come up on

Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo 2006.1 profile and use flag changes

2006-09-04 Thread Richard Fish
On 9/4/06, b.n. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I don't get it. A given arch system should be self consistent. An ~arch system in theory should be too, but being testing I understand it can not. The purpose of being on arch should be "having a self consistent system within itself" not "having a mostly

Re: [gentoo-user] where is .... the patch?

2006-09-04 Thread Richard Fish
On 9/4/06, Manuel Pérez López <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Where is the patch /usr/portage/gnustep-base/gnustep-base/files/base-user-defaults.patch-1.10.0 ? It is not in portage and emerge needs it for gnustep-base/gnustep-base-1.10.3 Any solution? If you need something immediately, you'll eith

Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo 2006.1 profile and use flag changes

2006-09-04 Thread b.n.
Richard Fish wrote: On 9/3/06, b.n. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Ah, the mystery of why are things marked stable... If fixes for 4.1.1 are in ~arch, why is 4.1.1 in arch? For the benefit of the (hopefully, vast majority of) users not affected by this. It should only be a few, seldom-used packag

Re: [gentoo-user] xmms-status-plugin-1.0 emerge failed

2006-09-04 Thread Andrea Bona
Hoping it helps: http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-494577-highlight-xmmsstatusplugin.html Bye Andrea -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] where is .... the patch?

2006-09-04 Thread Dale
Manuel Pérez López wrote: > Where is the patch > /usr/portage/gnustep-base/gnustep-base/files/base-user-defaults.patch-1.10.0 ? > > It is not in portage and emerge needs it for gnustep-base/gnustep-base-1.10.3 > > Any solution? > > Thanks > This may help: http://ftp.riken.go.jp/pub/Linux/gento

Re: [gentoo-user] Problems emerging amule with gcc-4.1.1 in gentoo 2006.1

2006-09-04 Thread Nico
A la fin de ton erreur ya :"!!! You need to emerge wxGTK with unicode in your USE"c'est fait ? ^^

[gentoo-user] Re: bc only does integer division

2006-09-04 Thread Alexander Skwar
· Alex Schuster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Yes, this is a known bug. 1.06.95 will fix this issuet, but that might > take a while, since the bug is known since june. > > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136643 > > The stable version 1.06-r6 is working fine, so I suggest you > downgrade. Th

Re: [gentoo-user] another openoffice build failure

2006-09-04 Thread Allan Gottlieb
At Sat, 02 Sep 2006 19:16:05 -0700 Richard Fish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 9/2/06, Allan Gottlieb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I am not sure what to try next. I suppose I could try to revert back >> to gcc3.4.6 >> ajglap hdc10 # gcc-config --list-profiles >> [1] i686-pc-linux-gnu-3

Re: [gentoo-user] Suspend2-sources-2.6.17 stable.

2006-09-04 Thread Richard Fish
On 9/4/06, Matthew Dawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I was just wondering, does anyone know why suspend2-sources-2.6.17 not stable yet? And if anyone is using it, is it stable enough for general use? I'm not actually using it ATM (I need a .18 kernel for suspend-to-ram to work correctly), but

Re: [gentoo-user] vim broken colours

2006-09-04 Thread Jorge Almeida
On Mon, 4 Sep 2006, Richard Fish wrote: > On 9/4/06, Jorge Almeida <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > You can try restoring the previous version (6.4) and see if it is > still a problem: > I already did. Can't be without vim, and syntax files are a must. > emerge --oneshot =app-editors/vim-6.4 Every

Re: [gentoo-user] Problem Installing alsa-driver

2006-09-04 Thread Richard Fish
On 9/4/06, Colleen Beamer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Yes, I had it set to AC97 when I took the screenprint, but I had it set to "intel8x0" and I *still* got the error message that it couldn't recognize the sound card. I suspect you simply typod something, or that your new kernel introduced an i

Re: [gentoo-user] vim broken colours

2006-09-04 Thread Richard Fish
On 9/4/06, Jorge Almeida <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I just upgraded vim a few hours ago to 7.0.17. Now syntax colours are simply chaotic, to the point that I would be better off with nano or such (but I'm not that desperate yet). etc-update wanted to update /etc/vim/vimrc, and I said yes without

Re: [gentoo-user] gcc upgrade: openldap/perl error...

2006-09-04 Thread Richard Fish
On 9/4/06, Jarry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: !!! If you need support, post the topmost build error, and the call stack if relevant. Do this. The actual error is some lines above in the actual configuration output. *NOT* the line that starts with !!! ERRROR. We need to see the actual erro

Re: [gentoo-user] bc only does integer division

2006-09-04 Thread Alex Schuster
Alexander Skwar writes: > When I called "bc -l", I used to be able to do proper divisions, > ie. 1/4 returned 0.25. But now: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] /all $ bc -l > bc 1.06.94 > Copyright 1991-1994, 1997, 1998, 2000, 2004, 2006 Free Software > Foundation, Inc. This is free software with ABSOLUTELY NO

[gentoo-user] Problems emerging amule with gcc-4.1.1 in gentoo 2006.1

2006-09-04 Thread Fede
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello, i have problem with amule: zoka fede # emerge amule Calculating dependencies... done! >>> Emerging (1 of 1) net-p2p/amule-2.1.2 to / >>> checking ebuild checksums ;-) >>> checking auxfile checksums ;-) >>> checking miscfile checksums ;-) >>> ch

Re: [gentoo-user] bc only does integer division

2006-09-04 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Mon, 04 Sep 2006 22:05:38 +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote: > When I called "bc -l", I used to be able to do proper divisions, > ie. 1/4 returned 0.25. But now: Same here, I put =sys-devel/bc-1.06.94 in /etc/portage/package.mask. -- Neil Bothwick Everybody needs a little love sometime; stop ha

Re: [gentoo-user] How to downgrade X and its dependencies

2006-09-04 Thread Donnie Berkholz
don wrote: > I foolishly upgraded to xorg7, and found some things that don't work. > I'd like to go back to 6.8 which is the last stable version. > > However there are a lot of packages that got upgraded, too many to list > here. > > Is the a fairly simple way to get them all downgraded to the ve

Re: [gentoo-user] How to downgrade X and its dependencies

2006-09-04 Thread Michael Sullivan
On Mon, 2006-09-04 at 12:34 -0700, don wrote: > I foolishly upgraded to xorg7, and found some things that don't work. > I'd like to go back to 6.8 which is the last stable version. > > However there are a lot of packages that got upgraded, too many to list > here. > > Is the a fairly simple way t

[gentoo-user] Problem Installing alsa-driver

2006-09-04 Thread Colleen Beamer
Hello all, I've had to rebuild my system after my bonehead mistake of the other day. I used the minimal install CD. The reinstallation is progressing OK, but I'm having problems compiling alsa-driver. And this is what I had installed on this machine previously. This line is cut from lspci 00:

[gentoo-user] bc only does integer division

2006-09-04 Thread Alexander Skwar
Hello! When I called "bc -l", I used to be able to do proper divisions, ie. 1/4 returned 0.25. But now: [EMAIL PROTECTED] /all $ bc -l bc 1.06.94 Copyright 1991-1994, 1997, 1998, 2000, 2004, 2006 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This is free software with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY. For details type `w

[gentoo-user] splash for laptop

2006-09-04 Thread Timothy A. Holmes
Hi folks: I have a laptop with a 1440x900 display panel and I would really like to use the Gentoo2006 (honeycomb) theme for my splash. How do I convert / modify / whatever the graphic to be able to be used on my big display. Thanks TIM Timothy A. Holmes IT Manager / Network Admin / Web Master

[gentoo-user] How to downgrade X and its dependencies

2006-09-04 Thread don
I foolishly upgraded to xorg7, and found some things that don't work. I'd like to go back to 6.8 which is the last stable version. However there are a lot of packages that got upgraded, too many to list here. Is the a fairly simple way to get them all downgraded to the version that works with xor

[gentoo-user] Re: ttyS1 - ttyS3 file exists

2006-09-04 Thread Francesco Talamona
On Sunday 03 September 2006 19:44, Ted Ozolins wrote: > For several years I've had no reason to use any of the serial ports > on this boxen. Now that I have a need for a fax setup, I find that > they are borked. Looking over the error messages at boot up I noticed > that I get a series of: > insmod

[gentoo-user] networkless 2006.1 to kde ?

2006-09-04 Thread James
Hello, I just installed an (K8 turion) using the 2006.1 liveCD and the networkless option. It went smoothly. I want to conver the gtk-ish install into kde, and this is where I have borked the newly installed sytems. So here is a little scheme to get to where I want to be, hopefully without bor

[gentoo-user] Re: Again - problem on installing Gentoo

2006-09-04 Thread Harm Geerts
On Monday 04 September 2006 17:54, Stephen Liu wrote: > # ls -al /boot/ > .keep > boot -> . > grub > linux-2.6.17-gentoo-r5 > loar+found > * end * + > Just rechecked it. It is; > 'kernel (hd0,0)/boot/kernel-2.6.17-gentoo-r7 root=/dev/hda2' > > Sorry it was my typing mistake on my posting. = wro

[gentoo-user] Re: xorg 7.0

2006-09-04 Thread James
Benno Schulenberg gmail.com> writes: > > in the make.conf do I use 'ati' or 'radeon' > Put in both, then do an 'emerge xorg-x11 -pv" and see that "ati" > doesn't show up anywhere, as it's not a valid name in VIDEO_CARDS. > The real choice is between radeon and fglrx, the open source and > t

[gentoo-user] Re: Again - problem on installing Gentoo

2006-09-04 Thread Marc Blumentritt
Stephen Liu schrieb: > I installed grub manually with; > # cat << EOF | grub >> root (hd0,0) >> setup (hd0) >> EOF > .. (hd0,0)/boot/grub/stage2/boot/grub/menu.lst...succeeded. > > Kernel image has to be copied manually; > # cp arch/x86_64/boot/bzImage /boot/linux-2.6.17-gentoo-r5 > > # ls -a

Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo 2006.1 profile and use flag changes

2006-09-04 Thread Daniel Pielmeier
I have already stated that I don't think that such a thing exists. Now what I do is to not change my profile before # emerge -uvpDNt doesn't what to emerge anything. Then immediately after changing the profile I run the same command again and that makes it quite clear which use flags changed

Re: [gentoo-user] libstdc++-v3 and gcc-4.1

2006-09-04 Thread Andrea Moro
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 yes, it should be safe. a.m. Etaoin Shrdlu wrote: > Is the libstdc++-v3 old compatibility package obsolete in a gcc-4.1-only > system? > > I've checked with ldd and all the apps which need libstdc++ ling against > the one provided by gcc-4.1.1, an

Re: [gentoo-user] ATI Mobility TV-OUT

2006-09-04 Thread Mark Knecht
On 9/4/06, Grant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 7) Note that this doesn't seem to be nearly as bad when I configure > the machines to use the CRT output. I'm going to investigatge buying > some sort of VGA->S-Video or Composite video converter. That may work > better and not require all this crazy

[gentoo-user] gcc upgrade: openldap/perl error...

2006-09-04 Thread Jarry
Hi, I tried to upgrade my gcc, but failed while doing "emerge -eav world" with this error-message: !!! ERROR: net-nds/openldap-2.3.24-r1 failed. Call stack: ebuild.sh, line 1555: Called dyn_setup ebuild.sh, line 668: Called pkg_setu

[gentoo-user] Re: Dash as /bin/sh?

2006-09-04 Thread Alexander Skwar
Erik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Alexander Skwar wrote: >> The Ubuntu folks report on https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DashAsBinSh, that >> bootup and also ./configure runs are *WAY* faster if "dash" is used >> as /bin/sh instead of bash. >> >> Did anyone try this out on Gentoo? Are the boot scripts from Gentoo

Re: [gentoo-user] Again - problem on installing Gentoo

2006-09-04 Thread Stephen Liu
Hi Jean-Marc, > Are you sure about 'kernel (hd0,0)/boot/kernel-2.6.17/gentoo-r7 > root=/dev/hda2' > Shouldn't it be 'kernel (hd0,0)/boot/kernel-2.6.17-gentoo-r7 > root=/dev/hda2' > instead ? Just rechecked it. It is; 'kernel (hd0,0)/boot/kernel-2.6.17-gentoo-r7 root=/dev/hda2' Sorry it was my

[gentoo-user] vim broken colours

2006-09-04 Thread Jorge Almeida
I just upgraded vim a few hours ago to 7.0.17. Now syntax colours are simply chaotic, to the point that I would be better off with nano or such (but I'm not that desperate yet). etc-update wanted to update /etc/vim/vimrc, and I said yes without looking because I knew I didn't had it personalized.

Re: [gentoo-user] Again - problem on installing Gentoo

2006-09-04 Thread Jean-Marc Beaune
Hi,   Are you sure about 'kernel (hd0,0)/boot/kernel-2.6.17/gentoo-r7 root=/dev/hda2' Shouldn't it be 'kernel (hd0,0)/boot/kernel-2.6.17-gentoo-r7 root=/dev/hda2' instead ?  On 9/4/06, Stephen Liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi folks,Have another round installing Gentoo, running"install-amd64_minima

Re: [gentoo-user] ATI Mobility TV-OUT

2006-09-04 Thread Grant
7) Note that this doesn't seem to be nearly as bad when I configure the machines to use the CRT output. I'm going to investigatge buying some sort of VGA->S-Video or Composite video converter. That may work better and not require all this crazy work. Check this out: http://www.digitalconnection

[gentoo-user] Again - problem on installing Gentoo

2006-09-04 Thread Stephen Liu
Hi folks, Have another round installing Gentoo, running "install-amd64_minimal-2006.1". Still encountered the same problem apart from that of Internet connection. Installation went through without difficulty. Grub started but ending at "Error 15 : File not found". I installed grub manually wit

[gentoo-user] Suspend2-sources-2.6.17 stable.

2006-09-04 Thread Matthew Dawson
Hey, I was just wondering, does anyone know why suspend2-sources-2.6.17 not stable yet? And if anyone is using it, is it stable enough for general use? I've looked on google and gentoo bugs, but nothing appears thats useful. Thanks in advance. -- __ Ma

Re: [gentoo-user] *solved* fail to compile: digikamimageplugins

2006-09-04 Thread Adrian
On Sat, 02 Sep 2006 11:31:12 -0500 Dale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote the words: > This is what package the command belongs too. > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] / # equery belongs acinclude.m4 > > [ Searching for file(s) acinclude.m4 in *... ] > > sys-devel/libtool-1.5.22 (/usr/share/libtool/libltdl/acinclu

Re: [gentoo-user] how to keep the souce for debugging under gentoo?

2006-09-04 Thread fei huang
On 9/4/06, Graham Murray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: "fei huang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:>  however, I found the source from /usr/portage/distfiles does not match the running instance, then I realized that the > running executable is compiled from patched or altered version of source files. Is th

AW: [gentoo-user] looking for Xwindow icq client

2006-09-04 Thread Noack, Sebastian
Different from kde, in the world gnome there is no wrapper for the corresponding toolkit (gtk+ in the case of gnome or qt in the case of kde). While real kde-apps use the kdelibs, apps for the gnome desktop use the gtk+ toolkit directly. So, whether a gtk+ based app is related to the gnome desktop

[gentoo-user] libstdc++-v3 and gcc-4.1

2006-09-04 Thread Etaoin Shrdlu
Is the libstdc++-v3 old compatibility package obsolete in a gcc-4.1-only system? I've checked with ldd and all the apps which need libstdc++ ling against the one provided by gcc-4.1.1, and I have no binary-only packages. Is it safe to remove libstdc++-v3? Thanks -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mail

Re: [gentoo-user] libstdc++.so.6 - another gcc upgrade problem?

2006-09-04 Thread mathias
Mike Williams wrote: On Sunday 03 September 2006 22:42, Mick wrote: Three days later I am still remerging world. Now kmail won't launch: emerge -e ? = $ kmail kmail: /usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/3.4.6/libstdc++.so.6: vers

Re: [gentoo-user] Getting Photos From A Digital Camera

2006-09-04 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Mon, 04 Sep 2006 14:07:46 +1200, Nick Rout wrote: > By the look of this you may be able to mount a gphoto2 compatible camera > soon: > > http://www.gphoto.org/proj/gphotofs/ > > FUSE seems to be making a file system of everything. the last time I tried that, it didn't work. It doesn't reall

Re: [gentoo-user] gallery file integrity problem

2006-09-04 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Sun, 3 Sep 2006 23:55:11 -0600, Trenton Adams wrote: > I gett the following warning on step 2 of the www-apps/gallery-2.0.4 > installation. > > gallery file integrity Warning > - Modified files (1) > modules/ffmpeg/classes/FfmpegToolkit.class > > Any ideas? Has this php script been hacked

Re: [gentoo-user] xorg 7.0

2006-09-04 Thread Benno Schulenberg
James wrote: > lspci reveal this video card: > ATI Radeon XPRESS 200M 5955 (PCIE) > > in the make.conf do I use 'ati' or 'radeon' > VIDEO_CARDS="ati" > or > VIDEO_CARDS="radeon" Put in both, then do an 'emerge xorg-x11 -pv" and see that "ati" doesn't show up anywhere, as it's not a valid name in

[gentoo-user] libstdc++-v3 and gcc-4.1

2006-09-04 Thread Etaoin Shrdlu
Is the libstdc++-v3 old compatibility package obsolete in a gcc-4.1-only system? I've checked with ldd and all the apps which need libstdc++ ling against the one provided by gcc-4.1.1, and I have no binary-only packages. Is it safe to remove libstdc++-v3? Thanks -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mail

Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo 2006.1 profile and use flag changes

2006-09-04 Thread Richard Fish
On 9/3/06, b.n. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Ah, the mystery of why are things marked stable... If fixes for 4.1.1 are in ~arch, why is 4.1.1 in arch? For the benefit of the (hopefully, vast majority of) users not affected by this. It should only be a few, seldom-used packages that have this pro

Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo 2006.1 profile and use flag changes

2006-09-04 Thread Richard Fish
On 9/3/06, Mick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: remerged. I am thinking to just emerge -epv system only and *not* world on another box of mine. Would that be OK? What do I need to revedep-rebuild afterward? The revdep-rebuild with libstdc++.so.5 was strictly for the 3.3 to 3.4 upgrade. Assuming