Mick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Would I likely be opening my lan up for some christmas shopping by
>> having a gentoo guest on a WinXP host running as a DMZ machine?
>> It would be pretty barebones with a IPTABLE setup for logging and
>> tagging or whatever I get interested in doing with the t
On Thu, 13 Dec 2007, Jeff Cranmer wrote:
> I am presently having problems compiling suspend2 kernel 2.6.22.
> It compiles with genkernel, but if I try to use make and customise a special
> kernel, it will not find my hard drive. The error message reports that the
> ide-cdrom on hda is the only
On 13 Dec 2007, at 20:53, Marzan, Richard non Unisys wrote:
I'm trying to get my Broadcom 4311 b/g card to work with the native
kernel driver (bcm43xx) and b43-fwcutter but it's does not work. I
placed the extracted firmware code in /lib/firmware and dmesg
states that it failed to load th
Hemmann, Volker Armin tu-clausthal.de> writes:
> I have the best results with 300Hz. With 1000Hz the kernel wastes to much
> time
> context switching. Compiling is slower, gaming FPS lower ...
OK, I have read all that was posted and I'm experimenting with new kernels.
Thanks for all of the
I am presently having problems compiling suspend2 kernel 2.6.22.
It compiles with genkernel, but if I try to use make and customise a special
kernel, it will not find my hard drive. The error message reports that the
ide-cdrom on hda is the only drive present.
The computer is a Toshiba L45-7409
On Freitag, 14. Dezember 2007, Joshua Doll wrote:
> Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
> > On Donnerstag, 13. Dezember 2007, Joshua Doll wrote:
> >> Jason Carson wrote:
> >>> I was reading this article (http://lwn.net/Articles/114770/) which
> >>> says...
> >>>
> >>> AS (Anticipatory Scheduler) still see
Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
On Donnerstag, 13. Dezember 2007, Joshua Doll wrote:
Jason Carson wrote:
I was reading this article (http://lwn.net/Articles/114770/) which
says...
AS (Anticipatory Scheduler) still seems to be better for desktop systems
and IDE disks
... I have a server,
On Donnerstag, 13. Dezember 2007, Joshua Doll wrote:
> Jason Carson wrote:
> > I was reading this article (http://lwn.net/Articles/114770/) which
> > says...
> >
> > AS (Anticipatory Scheduler) still seems to be better for desktop systems
> > and IDE disks
> >
> > ... I have a server, not a desktop
On Thu, 2007-12-13 at 13:09 -0600, Dan Farrell wrote:
> On Sat, 8 Dec 2007 13:41:06 -0500
>
> I don't run iptables on my laptops. Instead, I choose to run only a
> few secure services and then proceed to not worry about it.
>
hmmm - another target.
Firewalls can be viewed as a waste of time
On Dec 13, 2007 3:57 PM, Jason Carson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was reading this article (http://lwn.net/Articles/114770/) which says...
>
The article is very old, take a look at this, newer one:
http://www.redhat.com/magazine/008jun05/features/schedulers/
>
> AS (Anticipatory Scheduler) sti
Jason Carson wrote:
I was reading this article (http://lwn.net/Articles/114770/) which says...
AS (Anticipatory Scheduler) still seems to be better for desktop systems
and IDE disks
... I have a server, not a desktop system but am using an IDE disk so
which scheduler is better for a server. Sho
On Donnerstag, 13. Dezember 2007, Jason Carson wrote:
> I was reading this article (http://lwn.net/Articles/114770/) which says...
>
> AS (Anticipatory Scheduler) still seems to be better for desktop systems
> and IDE disks
>
> ... I have a server, not a desktop system but am using an IDE disk so
>
I was reading this article (http://lwn.net/Articles/114770/) which says...
AS (Anticipatory Scheduler) still seems to be better for desktop systems
and IDE disks
... I have a server, not a desktop system but am using an IDE disk so
which scheduler is better for a server. Should I stay with antici
I'm trying to get my Broadcom 4311 b/g card to work with the native
kernel driver (bcm43xx) and b43-fwcutter but it's does not work. I
placed the extracted firmware code in /lib/firmware and dmesg states
that it failed to load the module. Has anyone gotten this card to work
and how? Any link
071213 Jason Carson wrote:
> Where in 'make menuconfig' do I find the choice for schedulers.
> The one I am currently using is "Anticipatory".
> What is the newest and latest scheduler for 2.6.23?
Try '/sched', which will get you started & lead you to
'Enable block layer -> IO Schedulers -> whate
On Dec 13, 2007 3:27 PM, Jason Carson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> Where in the kernel config (make menuconfig) do I find the choice for
> schedulers. The one I am currently using is "Anticipatory". What is the
> newest and latest scheduler for 2.6.23?
>
> Regards,
>
> Jason Carson
On Thursday 13 December 2007, Dan Farrell wrote:
> On Thu, 06 Dec 2007 09:50:58 -0500
>
> Billy Holmes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > also look for entries where is says eth0 has entered promiscuous
> > mode
> > - that's a sure fire sign you've been hacked.. unless you're running
> > a virtual mach
Greetings,
Where in the kernel config (make menuconfig) do I find the choice for
schedulers. The one I am currently using is "Anticipatory". What is the
newest and latest scheduler for 2.6.23?
Regards,
Jason Carson
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 00:16:10 -0300
Norberto Bensa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> I'm sorry for this very off-topic post but my MSI-P965 Platinum have
> wreck it's first PCI-e slot and so did my NVidia 7900GS (I don't
> know which one died first but I'm pretty sure both are dead)
>
On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 15:58:02 -0800
Grant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't know, now that I've set up shorewall on my router it seems
> like a simple matter to set it up on another machine. I should only
> need to edit a few config files with very light additions.
>
> - Grant
Either way you
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 08:22:45 +
Mick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Given that systems like e.g. Ubuntu server do not even have a
> firewall running would make you think so. The fact that while on the
> road you only stay connected for short periods of time would improve
> your chances too. How
On Sat, 08 Dec 2007 15:51:31 +0100
Norman Rieß <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> David Relson schrieb:
> >
> >
> >
> > Hello Norman,
> >
> > I, too, have one of their controllers (identified by lspci as "RAID
> > bus controller: Silicon Image, Inc. PCI0680 Ultra ATA-133 Host
> > Controller (rev 02)".
> > I'm going
> > to try 2006.1 and Knoppix.
> >
> > - Grant
>
> You don't use minimals, grant? I'm surprised. I would never put a
> liveCD in a computer if I could avoid it, myself.
What do you mean?
- Grant
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
On Thu, 6 Dec 2007 10:44:35 -0800
Grant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm going
> to try 2006.1 and Knoppix.
>
> - Grant
You don't use minimals, grant? I'm surprised. I would never put a
liveCD in a computer if I could avoid it, myself.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
On Thu, 06 Dec 2007 09:50:58 -0500
Billy Holmes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> also look for entries where is says eth0 has entered promiscuous
> mode
> - that's a sure fire sign you've been hacked.. unless you're running
> a virtual machine with a bridge, or your own packet sniffer/traffic
> mo
On Donnerstag, 13. Dezember 2007, Philip Webb wrote:
> 071214 Shawn Haggett wrote:
> >> CONFIG_HZ_100=y
> >> # CONFIG_HZ_250 is not set
> >> # CONFIG_HZ_300 is not set
> >> # CONFIG_HZ_1000 is not set
> >> CONFIG_HZ=100
> >
> > Smaller numbers here actually mean less clock interrupts per second.
>
Philip Webb wrote:
> I don't play games, but I've long had my desktop box using HZ_1000
> & it has always been very responsive (now Intel Core 2 Duo, 2.6.23-r3).
> That's certainly the first thing to try.
I use 100 Hz on an old P3 desktop/server. It's not a high traffic
server, but it does my web
071214 Shawn Haggett wrote:
>> CONFIG_HZ_100=y
>> # CONFIG_HZ_250 is not set
>> # CONFIG_HZ_300 is not set
>> # CONFIG_HZ_1000 is not set
>> CONFIG_HZ=100
> Smaller numbers here actually mean less clock interrupts per second.
> ie the CPU doesn't have to spend as much time switching between process
CONFIG_HZ_100=y
# CONFIG_HZ_250 is not set
# CONFIG_HZ_300 is not set
# CONFIG_HZ_1000 is not set
CONFIG_HZ=100
Smaller numbers here actually mean less clock interrupts per second.
This means that the CPU doesn't have to spend as much time switching
between processes. However it also means tha
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Setup:
Home Lan with principle desktop machine running Gentoo.
Three other machines running WinXP that are a trio of video and sound
editing machines. And finally my wifes WinXP machine in antoher room.
All connected by Gigabit lan thru a netgear FVP318 router/firewall
On Donnerstag, 13. Dezember 2007, James wrote:
> # CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY is not set
betwen 2.6.22 and 2.6.23 the new scheduler was introduced. Most people (like
me) have had positive results related to gaming. But maybe bzflag is stupidly
coded?
Nonetheless you should try 'voluntary' preemp
> > > I don't know, now that I've set up shorewall on my router it seems
> > > like a simple matter to set it up on another machine. I should only
> > > need to edit a few config files with very light additions.
> > >
> > > - Grant
> >
> > Understand - to be honest I have moved to shorewall on alm
Hello,
I use the gentoo kernel series for my production systems.
On my gaming system, I have a 2.6.22-gentoo-r8 kernel
that works very well for gaming (bzflag). It an amd64
with 2 gig of ram.
I've tried to build a 2.6.23-getnoo-r3 kernel for gaming
and it performs very poorly with no other chan
Grant написа:
>> I'd like to create a really restricted user on my laptop. I don't
>> want the user to be able to do much of anything but browse the web,
>> use skype, and maybe look at photos on a CD or something. I did this:
>>
>> useradd -m -G users,audio,cdrom -s /sbin/nologin newuser
>>
>> H
> > I don't know, now that I've set up shorewall on my router it seems
> > like a simple matter to set it up on another machine. I should only
> > need to edit a few config files with very light additions.
> >
> > - Grant
>
> Understand - to be honest I have moved to shorewall on almost all my
> m
> I'd like to create a really restricted user on my laptop. I don't
> want the user to be able to do much of anything but browse the web,
> use skype, and maybe look at photos on a CD or something. I did this:
>
> useradd -m -G users,audio,cdrom -s /sbin/nologin newuser
>
> How does that look? I
On Thursday 13 December 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Setup:
> Home Lan with principle desktop machine running Gentoo.
> Three other machines running WinXP that are a trio of video and sound
> editing machines. And finally my wifes WinXP machine in antoher room.
> All connected by Gigabit lan t
On Wednesday 12 December 2007, Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 12. Dezember 2007 schrieb Grant:
> > I've noticed when adding this kind of a user in the past they are able to
> > look at files all around the system that I'd prefer they can't.
>
> Why? System directories look nearly the same on
Hi
I'm trying to finish an emerge world and I'm stumbling on getting opal to
compile so it can continue.
I'm running on an AMD proc with i686 arch in my make.conf file. So, the no
such instruction error message is baffleing.
It seems to die with slightly different instruction errors each time
39 matches
Mail list logo
