On Sun, 6 Jan 2008 16:31:43 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
>OK, I took a few minutes away from his Half Life game to look at
> BIOS. I found the AHCI option and enabled it. Of course he wanted to
> get back to gaming so we tried to boot back into Windows but XP goes
> blue screen at the first disk
Hi!
On Sun, 6 Jan 2008 16:31:43 -0800 "Mark Knecht" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>OK, I took a few minutes away from his Half Life game to look at
> BIOS. I found the AHCI option and enabled it. Of course he wanted to
> get back to gaming so we tried to boot back into Windows but XP goes
> blue
On Jan 7, 2008 12:15 AM, Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 6 Jan 2008 16:31:43 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
>
> >OK, I took a few minutes away from his Half Life game to look at
> > BIOS. I found the AHCI option and enabled it. Of course he wanted to
> > get back to gaming so we t
To boot my linux, I faced a JMicron eSata/Pata controller problem,
that prevented my SATA disk from being recognized. => I had to use a
2.6.23 kernel, founded on the gentoo forum. (the knoppix latest
released I used were 2.6.19 !!!) Do you also have a JMicron controller
?
>Is there any other s
On Mon, 7 Jan 2008 12:53:29 +0100, Galevsky wrote:
> "AHCI is fully supported out of the box for Microsoft Windows Vista
> and the Linux operating system from kernel 2.6.19. Older operating
> systems require drivers written by the host bus adapter vendor in
> order to support AHCI."
The Windows
Hi
I'm trying to configure my postfix server to use TLS, which should be
quite straightforward according to the different guides I have found
using Google.
When I telnet into my postfix installation I get this:
# telnet localhost 25
Trying 127.0.0.1...
Connected to localhost.
Escape character is
On Jan 7, 2008 1:23 PM, Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The Windows install that I mentioned having problems with AHCI is Vista.
Good to know I just faced problem with AHCI on XP, and thought
that there were no matter on Vista... so install drivers first for the
whole M$ family...
On Mon, 07 Jan 2008 13:35:29 +0100
Jules Colding wrote:
> Hi
Hi,
> I'm trying to configure my postfix server to use TLS, which should be
> quite straightforward according to the different guides I have found
> using Google.
That's my guide, it's in Spanish, but I think you could check config
fil
I see that it's now stable, and I'm going to let the emerge go forward.
However, I scrolled back my terminal to when I sent that message, and here's
what eix gave me then (primarily the "~" in front of 1.0.4. Could this be
an asychrony with the eix database?
treat portage # eix k3b
[I] app-cdr/k3
On Monday 07 January 2008, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
> I see that it's now stable, and I'm going to let the emerge go
> forward. However, I scrolled back my terminal to when I sent that
> message, and here's what eix gave me then (primarily the "~" in front
> of 1.0.4. Could this be an asychrony with
Johann Schmitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
>> Turns up nothing even close. Does it mean I'm still missing something
>> in the kernel build? or is it just baloney or out of date?
>
> Hi,
> you can simply check our kernel config by typing:
>
> cat /usr/src/linux/.conf
On Jan 7, 2008 3:34 AM, Renat Golubchyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Sun, 6 Jan 2008 16:31:43 -0800 "Mark Knecht" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >OK, I took a few minutes away from his Half Life game to look at
> > BIOS. I found the AHCI option and enabled it. Of course he wanted to
On Monday 7 January 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I see:
> grep -i ^[^#].*conntrack /usr/src/linux/.config
>
> CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK_ENABLED=m
> CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK=m
> CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK_MARK=y
> CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK_SECMARK=y
> CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK_EVENTS=y
> CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MAT
On Mon, 7 Jan 2008 07:46:34 -0800 "Mark Knecht" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Jan 7, 2008 3:34 AM, Renat Golubchyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > On Sun, 6 Jan 2008 16:31:43 -0800 "Mark Knecht"
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >OK, I took a few minutes away from his Half Life ga
On Jan 7, 2008 8:10 AM, Renat Golubchyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Jan 2008 07:46:34 -0800 "Mark Knecht" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > On Jan 7, 2008 3:34 AM, Renat Golubchyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > On Sun, 6 Jan 2008 16:31:43 -0800 "Mark Knecht"
> > > <[EMAI
Yes i emerge it but after i've unmerged it.
So probably was added during this install.
Grant a écrit :
>> Yes i've the same:
>>
>> ls /lib/firmware/rt73.bin
>> /lib/firmware/rt73.bin
>>
>> But i don't remember to setted up it.
>
> Well, it wasn't the kernel right? :)
>
> Were you experimenting
> Yes i emerge it but after i've unmerged it.
>
> So probably was added during this install.
What install do you think has added it?
- Grant
> >> Yes i've the same:
> >>
> >> ls /lib/firmware/rt73.bin
> >> /lib/firmware/rt73.bin
> >>
> >> But i don't remember to setted up it.
> >
> > Well, it w
Etaoin Shrdlu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I see:
>> grep -i ^[^#].*conntrack /usr/src/linux/.config
>>
>> CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK_ENABLED=m
>> CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK=m
>> CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK_MARK=y
>> CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK_SECMARK=y
>> CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK_EVENTS=y
>> CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MAT
On Monday 7 January 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Should I have compiled them directly into the kernel?
Well, this is usually a matter of debates. For iptables stuff, I
generally compile everything into the kernel, but I'm sure there are
people who can find good reasons for using modules. So
Jules Colding wrote:
Hi
I'm trying to configure my postfix server to use TLS, which should be
quite straightforward according to the different guides I have found
using Google.
According to the guides this should be the desired output and TLS should
work, but all my mail clients (Thunderbird
On Sun, 2008-01-06 at 17:15 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Florian Philipp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> There's a reason for the existence of genkernel - it's so that you don't
> >> have to go through all this pain and suffering, and can instead remove
> >> stuff a bit at a time with r
I'm having a time getting ksh93 to install (build error at the end)
USE='static' emerge -v ksh93
The only other use flag coming up was `nls'
I wasn't real eager for `static' necessarily but without `static' had
already failed and I saw it was a possible flag. Also it might be
handy sometime in
Hi All,
I have installed gentoo on my laptop recently and I am having a huge
problem with speed.
The problem is the insanely slow disk access that I am getting.
here is some output:
manticore ~ # hdparm -tT /dev/hda
/dev/hda:
Timing cached reads: 5702 MB in 2.00 seconds = 2857.11 MB/sec
Check the options for your chipset in the kernel - look at device
drivers and ata/... devices. Looks like its just defaulted to the
minimum as it hasnt seen what chipset you are using.
Also consider moving to libata - seems better where I have tried it.
BillK
On Tue, 2008-01-08 at 02:26 +0200,
Florian Philipp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I guess it would be harmless to just run the `make modules_intall' part
>> again and catch a list.
>>
>
> I think you search for "modprobe -l" :)
Wow... and egad, look at this:
modprobe -l|wc -l
945
That is a kernel built with genkernel
--
g
Hello,
I just got a 500G FreeAgent (Seagate) drive.
I have it working via ivman:
/dev/sdb1 466G 144M 466G 1% /media/FreeAgent Drive
Bus 001 Device 003: ID 0bc2:3000 Seagate RSS LLC
I'm able to cd into it's directory tree and read various
files.
I assume it has NTFS by default. I have all
James wrote:
Hello,
I just got a 500G FreeAgent (Seagate) drive.
I have it working via ivman:
/dev/sdb1 466G 144M 466G 1% /media/FreeAgent Drive
Bus 001 Device 003: ID 0bc2:3000 Seagate RSS LLC
I'm able to cd into it's directory tree and read various
files.
I assume it has NTFS by defau
William Kenworthy wrote:
> Check the options for your chipset in the kernel - look at device
> drivers and ata/... devices. Looks like its just defaulted to the
> minimum as it hasnt seen what chipset you are using.
>
> Also consider moving to libata - seems better where I have tried it.
>
> BillK
On Jan 7, 2008 8:37 PM, Dale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> William Kenworthy wrote:
> > Check the options for your chipset in the kernel - look at device
> > drivers and ata/... devices. Looks like its just defaulted to the
> > minimum as it hasnt seen what chipset you are using.
> >
> > Also cons
I honestly have no idea how to deal with this one. It started a few
weeks ago and I hoped it would go away by itself.
!!! Multiple versions within a single package slot have been
!!! pulled into the dependency graph:
('ebuild', '/', 'dev-java/bcprov-1.37', 'merge') pulled in by
('ebuild', '/',
On Mon, 7 Jan 2008 20:51:02 -0500 "Mark Shields" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I'd also recommending after checking for the above, also check what
> level of UDMA is set. Try this: hdparm -I /dev/hda | grep -i dma
>
> Yours should say probably either udma3 or udma4.
Why not udma5 ? All my PATA d
On Jan 7, 2008 8:10 PM, Justin Patrin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I honestly have no idea how to deal with this one. It started a few
> weeks ago and I hoped it would go away by itself.
>
> !!! Multiple versions within a single package slot have been
> !!! pulled into the dependency graph:
>
> ('e
On Tuesday 08 January 2008, Justin Patrin wrote:
> I honestly have no idea how to deal with this one. It started a few
> weeks ago and I hoped it would go away by itself.
>
> !!! Multiple versions within a single package slot have been
> !!! pulled into the dependency graph:
>
> ('ebuild', '/', 'de
Renat Golubchyk wrote:
On Mon, 7 Jan 2008 20:51:02 -0500 "Mark Shields" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I'd also recommending after checking for the above, also check what
level of UDMA is set. Try this: hdparm -I /dev/hda | grep -i dma
Yours should say probably either udma3 or udma4.
Why not ud
34 matches
Mail list logo
