Re: [gentoo-user] testing a corrupt SD card

2009-02-11 Thread Iain Buchanan
On Fri, 2009-02-06 at 07:11 +, Stroller wrote: > On 6 Feb 2009, at 05:28, Iain Buchanan wrote: > > It's a Lexar Media 512Mb SD card, a couple of years old. Yes I know I > > can get a cheap 2Gb for <$20 but I'm more interested in the > > principle of > > the test :) > > I thought you could g

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: testing a corrupt SD card

2009-02-11 Thread Iain Buchanan
On Fri, 2009-02-06 at 16:47 +, James wrote: > Iain Buchanan netspace.net.au> writes: > > > > Does that mean my memory card is good to go, or should I use some other > > method of bad sector detection? > > Hello Iain, Hi James! [snip] > Here are a couple of links for your perusal: Unfort

Re: [gentoo-user] testing a corrupt SD card

2009-02-11 Thread Iain Buchanan
On Fri, 2009-02-06 at 22:21 +, Stroller wrote: > On 6 Feb 2009, at 05:28, Iain Buchanan wrote: > > ... > > so I created a file: > > dd if=/dev/urandom of=Desktop/random.img bs=1024 count=500960 > > It has just occurred to me: > > In the UK you can be imprisoned for failing to provide an encry

Re: [gentoo-user] testing a corrupt SD card

2009-02-11 Thread Iain Buchanan
On Fri, 2009-02-06 at 19:36 -0600, Paul Hartman wrote: > On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 11:28 PM, Iain Buchanan wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > recently my SD card just went bonkers. Unfortunately I lost a lot of > > photos on it (backups are useless until the data actually gets to the > > backup...) but fort

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Flash Drive Install

2009-02-11 Thread Iain Buchanan
On Fri, 2009-02-06 at 17:01 +, James wrote: > sean myfairpoint.net> writes: > > > > Once you go through the steps instructed here, > > http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/liveusb.xml > > cool Also see my blog http://nthrbldyblg.blogspot.com/2008/06/gentoo-linux-live-usb-key.html which has an easy

Re: [gentoo-user] vncviewer Recommendation

2009-02-11 Thread Iain Buchanan
On Mon, 2009-02-09 at 14:21 -0800, Drew Tomlinson wrote: > Aaron Clark wrote: > > Drew Tomlinson wrote: > >> I'm looking for an vncviewer for Linux that has the same features as the > >> Tight VNC viewer on Windows. I really like how the Windows viewer will > >> scale the desktop and "remember" co

Re: [gentoo-user] ALSA config problem

2009-02-11 Thread Iain Buchanan
On Mon, 2009-02-09 at 19:34 +0100, Naga wrote: > On Monday 09 February 2009 19:13:32 James wrote: > [...] > > The mobo has an Nvidia chip, the video card has a ATI video chip, > > both only work under the Intel HDA driver. These are compiled > > into the kernel, not loadable modules. I'm going bald

Re: [gentoo-user] ALSA config problem

2009-02-11 Thread Iain Buchanan
On Tue, 2009-02-10 at 19:38 +0100, Naga wrote: > On Tuesday 10 February 2009 07:02:16 Sebastian Günther wrote: > > * Naga (nagat...@gmail.com) [09.02.09 19:35]: > > > In the 2.6.28 kernel alsa is broken for hda-intel. Either use 2.6.27 > > > series kernel or use a live alsa ebuild. > > > > Why can

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: media-video/gspcav1 or kernel module?

2009-02-11 Thread Iain Buchanan
On Sun, 2009-02-08 at 11:14 +0100, Francesco Talamona wrote: > On Sunday 08 February 2009, Iain Buchanan wrote: > [...] > > I recently upgraded from 2.6.26 to 2.6.28. My el-cheapo webcam > > (lsusb: 0c45:602c Microdia Clas Ohlson TWC-30XOP WebCam) used the > > media-video/gspcav1 driver, but that

Re: [gentoo-user] media-video/gspcav1 or kernel module?

2009-02-11 Thread Iain Buchanan
On Sun, 2009-02-08 at 19:43 +0900, Mike Mazur wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 12:24 PM, Iain Buchanan wrote: > > I recently upgraded from 2.6.26 to 2.6.28. My el-cheapo webcam (lsusb: > > 0c45:602c Microdia Clas Ohlson TWC-30XOP WebCam) used the > > media-video/gspcav1 driver, but that n

Re: [gentoo-user] /etc/init.d/: ntpd or ntp-client?

2009-02-11 Thread Wolfgang Liebich
On Wed, Feb 04, 2009 at 06:20:50PM +, Stroller wrote: > > On 4 Feb 2009, at 14:11, Neil Bothwick wrote: >> On Wed, 4 Feb 2009 13:38:11 +, Stroller wrote: >> >>> So when I found the clock to be a week out of date I checked that ntpd >>> appeared to be running (it was) and restarted it. The d

[gentoo-user] Re: The Linux Ecosystem (with funny references to Gentoo vs Canonical)

2009-02-11 Thread Nicolas Sebrecht
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 08:41:39AM +, Mick wrote: > > This video brought up an interesting question by my friend (an ubuntu > > user). How would one go about getting Canonical or the ubuntu community > > to change their practice of not contributing fixes back upstream? It's all about dev men

[gentoo-user] Re: The Linux Ecosystem (with funny references to Gentoo vs Canonical)

2009-02-11 Thread Nicolas Sebrecht
On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 09:51:26PM -0800, Joshua D Doll wrote: > This video brought up an interesting question by my friend (an ubuntu > user). How would one go about getting Canonical or the ubuntu community to > change their practice of not contributing fixes back upstream? Without > having

Re: [gentoo-user] testing a corrupt SD card

2009-02-11 Thread Stroller
On 11 Feb 2009, at 00:54, Iain Buchanan wrote: On Fri, 2009-02-06 at 22:21 +, Stroller wrote: On 6 Feb 2009, at 05:28, Iain Buchanan wrote: ... so I created a file: dd if=/dev/urandom of=Desktop/random.img bs=1024 count=500960 It has just occurred to me: In the UK you can be imprisoned

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Flash Drive Install

2009-02-11 Thread sean
Iain Buchanan wrote: > > Just be mindful of James' comment about lots of writes! > It is more of a curiosity project.

Re: [gentoo-user] testing a corrupt SD card

2009-02-11 Thread Paul Hartman
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 6:59 PM, Iain Buchanan wrote: > On Fri, 2009-02-06 at 19:36 -0600, Paul Hartman wrote: >> On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 11:28 PM, Iain Buchanan >> wrote: >> > Hi all, >> > >> > recently my SD card just went bonkers. Unfortunately I lost a lot of >> > photos on it (backups are u

[gentoo-user] KDE-meta 4.2 upgrade

2009-02-11 Thread James
Hello, OK, I have read back into January the suggestions on this list about going to Kde-meta 4.2. I have dozens of workstations running gentoo, so now I'm going to upgrade one (test) laptop to get a feel for kde-4.2 and hopefully flesh out an upgrade strategy for all of these laptops and workstat

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE-meta 4.2 upgrade

2009-02-11 Thread Volker Armin Hemmann
On Mittwoch 11 Februar 2009, James wrote: > Hello, > > OK, I have read back into January the suggestions on this > list about going to Kde-meta 4.2. I have dozens of workstations > running gentoo, so now I'm going to upgrade one (test) laptop > to get a feel for kde-4.2 and hopefully flesh out an >

[gentoo-user] Re: KDE-meta 4.2 upgrade

2009-02-11 Thread james
Volker Armin Hemmann googlemail.com> writes: > > 6. emerge -DNv kde-meta > > Look plausible? Verbose comments are most welcome. > just emerge the kde-4.2 set instead of that meta stuff. Is there a problem with kde-meta-4.2.0 ? I have many different users asking for many different things, und

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: KDE-meta 4.2 upgrade

2009-02-11 Thread Volker Armin Hemmann
On Mittwoch 11 Februar 2009, james wrote: > Volker Armin Hemmann googlemail.com> writes: > > > 6. emerge -DNv kde-meta > > > > > > Look plausible? Verbose comments are most welcome. > > > > just emerge the kde-4.2 set instead of that meta stuff. > > Is there a problem with kde-meta-4.2.0 ? I have

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE-meta 4.2 upgrade

2009-02-11 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Wednesday 11 February 2009 20:25:13 James wrote: > Hello, > > OK, I have read back into January the suggestions on this > list about going to Kde-meta 4.2. I have dozens of workstations > running gentoo, so now I'm going to upgrade one (test) laptop > to get a feel for kde-4.2 and hopefully fles

[gentoo-user] Re: KDE-meta 4.2 upgrade

2009-02-11 Thread James
Alan McKinnon gmail.com> writes: Volker and Alan, > Finally, try to use sets if possible. The split -meta ebuilds were an ugly > hack until sets made it into portage. They were orders of magnitude better > than monolithic, but sets are just so much cleaner than -meta. Plus you get > to easily

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: KDE-meta 4.2 upgrade

2009-02-11 Thread Paul Hartman
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 3:29 PM, James wrote: > Alan McKinnon gmail.com> writes: > > Volker and Alan, > >> Finally, try to use sets if possible. The split -meta ebuilds were an ugly >> hack until sets made it into portage. They were orders of magnitude better >> than monolithic, but sets are just

Re: [gentoo-user] Permissions of /etc/sudoers

2009-02-11 Thread b.n.
Michael Hentsch ha scritto: > The file /etc/sudoers should always be edited with visudo. visudo uses > file locking, provides basic sanity checks and checks for parse errors. This always made me crazy. Why, why, why should I use a specialized editor to edit a system file? It's not like we have vi

[gentoo-user] Re: Permissions of /etc/sudoers

2009-02-11 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
b.n. wrote: Michael Hentsch ha scritto: The file /etc/sudoers should always be edited with visudo. visudo uses file locking, provides basic sanity checks and checks for parse errors. This always made me crazy. Why, why, why should I use a specialized editor to edit a system file? It's not lik

Re: [gentoo-user] Permissions of /etc/sudoers

2009-02-11 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Thu, 12 Feb 2009 00:52:22 +0100, b.n. wrote: > > The file /etc/sudoers should always be edited with visudo. visudo uses > > file locking, provides basic sanity checks and checks for parse > > errors. > > This always made me crazy. > > Why, why, why should I use a specialized editor to edit

Re: [gentoo-user] Permissions of /etc/sudoers

2009-02-11 Thread Paul Hartman
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 5:52 PM, b.n. wrote: > Michael Hentsch ha scritto: >> The file /etc/sudoers should always be edited with visudo. visudo uses >> file locking, provides basic sanity checks and checks for parse errors. > > This always made me crazy. > > Why, why, why should I use a specialize

Re: [gentoo-user] Permissions of /etc/sudoers

2009-02-11 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Wed, 11 Feb 2009 18:01:36 -0600, Paul Hartman wrote: > I guess an error in sudoers could allow the whole world to use sudo, > and someone decided to give this special cushion to this program and > none of the others that can also ruin your system in various other > ways. :) You could also lock

[gentoo-user] python-2.5.2-r7 build problems

2009-02-11 Thread Mark Knecht
Hi, I had two machine that for some reason wouldn't build the 2.5 slot for python. I've waited weeks for the possibility that something would get cleaned up in portage or on a server somewhere but as of yet it hasn't happened. For kicks today I cleaned out distfiles and did an emerge -e @system

Re: [gentoo-user] python-2.5.2-r7 build problems

2009-02-11 Thread Joshua D Doll
Mark Knecht wrote: Hi, I had two machine that for some reason wouldn't build the 2.5 slot for python. I've waited weeks for the possibility that something would get cleaned up in portage or on a server somewhere but as of yet it hasn't happened. For kicks today I cleaned out distfiles and did

Re: [gentoo-user] python-2.5.2-r7 build problems

2009-02-11 Thread Mark Knecht
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 6:25 PM, Joshua D Doll wrote: > Mark Knecht wrote: >> >> Hi, >> I had two machine that for some reason wouldn't build the 2.5 slot >> for python. I've waited weeks for the possibility that something would >> get cleaned up in portage or on a server somewhere but as of yet

Re: [gentoo-user] python-2.5.2-r7 build problems

2009-02-11 Thread Joshua D Doll
Mark Knecht wrote: On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 6:25 PM, Joshua D Doll wrote: Mark Knecht wrote: Hi, I had two machine that for some reason wouldn't build the 2.5 slot for python. I've waited weeks for the possibility that something would get cleaned up in portage or on a server somewhere

[gentoo-user] Re: KDE-meta 4.2 upgrade

2009-02-11 Thread james
Paul Hartman gmail.com> writes: > Basically, sets start with @ and you would just emerge like a meta, > emerge @kde-4.2 (or whatever). You can do "emerge --list-sets" to see > which are available to you. Rather than being meta listed in > /var/lib/portage/world the sets will be listed in > /var/

Re: [gentoo-user] Permissions of /etc/sudoers

2009-02-11 Thread Stroller
On 12 Feb 2009, at 00:01, Neil Bothwick wrote: ... there's nothing to stop you using any editor you like, directly, and it's the best choice if you want to be free to screw up the file. It's the Unix way! Stroller.

Re: [gentoo-user] python-2.5.2-r7 build problems

2009-02-11 Thread Mark Knecht
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 7:04 PM, Joshua D Doll wrote: > Mark Knecht wrote: >> >> On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 6:25 PM, Joshua D Doll >> wrote: >> >>> >>> Mark Knecht wrote: >>> Hi, I had two machine that for some reason wouldn't build the 2.5 slot for python. I've waited weeks for

Re: [gentoo-user] python-2.5.2-r7 build problems

2009-02-11 Thread Mark Knecht
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 7:04 PM, Joshua D Doll wrote: > > I might be mistaken, but I don't think that is make error message. You might > want to check further up in the build.log for more information. > > --Joshua Doll > > CFLAGS? The machine that fails: CFLAGS="-O3 -march=athlon-xp -funroll-lo

Re: [gentoo-user] python-2.5.2-r7 build problems

2009-02-11 Thread Mark Knecht
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 8:22 PM, Mark Knecht wrote: > On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 7:04 PM, Joshua D Doll wrote: > >> >> I might be mistaken, but I don't think that is make error message. You might >> want to check further up in the build.log for more information. >> >> --Joshua Doll >> >> > > CFLAGS

[gentoo-user] Can't login from terminal?

2009-02-11 Thread Chuanwen Wu
Hi, My gentoo worked very well in the past two years. But today I found that I can't login it from the terminal, but ssh login is OK. I have written down the login message: /*/ This is Gentoo-Server.unknown_domain (Linux i686 2.6.26-gentoo-r1) 12:22:39 Gentoo-Se

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: KDE-meta 4.2 upgrade

2009-02-11 Thread Dale
james wrote: > Paul Hartman gmail.com> writes: > > > >> Basically, sets start with @ and you would just emerge like a meta, >> emerge @kde-4.2 (or whatever). You can do "emerge --list-sets" to see >> which are available to you. Rather than being meta listed in >> /var/lib/portage/world the sets

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: KDE-meta 4.2 upgrade

2009-02-11 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Thursday 12 February 2009 07:01:36 Dale wrote: > Sorry to butt in here. I !think! I get what sets does, you add a group > of packages to a file and then when you do the @sets thing, it > emerges/upgrades that group of packages. I get that part. I guess from > what I am reading that we the us

Re: [gentoo-user] Can't login from terminal?

2009-02-11 Thread Sebastian Günther
* Chuanwen Wu (wcw8...@gmail.com) [12.02.09 05:41]: > Hi, > My gentoo worked very well in the past two years. But today I found > that I can't login it from the terminal, but ssh login is OK. > > Have anybody ever encountered this problem? > Any help will be appreciate! > man securetty HTH Seba

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE-meta 4.2 upgrade

2009-02-11 Thread Dirk Uys
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 9:19 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote: > > gotten out of the starting blocks, never mind actually there yet) and you may > run into trouble building system-settings (I didn't but others have). > If you are using an older compiler (like gcc-4.1.1-r3) you may get a linker error. Have

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE4.2 compile problem

2009-02-11 Thread Dirk Uys
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 8:41 AM, Dirk Uys wrote: > After some more struggling I managed to get kde-base/systemsettings > compiled: If I unmerge x11-libs/libxkbfile and then emerge > systemsettings, it compiles fine (without support for the xkb > settings). After that I did an emerge -DuvaN world a

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: KDE-meta 4.2 upgrade

2009-02-11 Thread Dale
Alan McKinnon wrote: > On Thursday 12 February 2009 07:01:36 Dale wrote: > > >> Sorry to butt in here. I !think! I get what sets does, you add a group >> of packages to a file and then when you do the @sets thing, it >> emerges/upgrades that group of packages. I get that part. I guess from >>

Re: [gentoo-user] Can't login from terminal?

2009-02-11 Thread Chuanwen Wu
Hi, thanks! > man securetty /*/ # cat /etc/securetty # /etc/securetty: list of terminals on which root is allowed to login. # See securetty(5) and login(1). console vc/0 vc/1 vc/2 vc/3 vc/4 vc/5 vc/6 vc/7 vc/8 vc/9 vc/10 vc/11 vc/12 tty0 tty1 tty2 tty3 tty4 tty5 tt