On Sunday 22 March 2009 22:42:39 Momesso Andrea wrote:
> Thanks for the advice. Will be a problem for lvm if I add a partition
> before it? I mean, will I need to change any config files while lvm is
> gonna reside on sda4 instead of sda3?
It's not a problem. LVM scans the drive looking for pvs an
On Sunday 22 March 2009 23:00:07 Momesso Andrea wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Mar 2009 22:35:35 +0200
>
> Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > On Sunday 22 March 2009 22:15:14 Momesso Andrea wrote:
> > Your data is safe if you do exactly the steps you said above.
>
> pvresize /dev/sda3
> /dev/sda3: too many metadata
On Mon, 23 Mar 2009 09:22:20 +0200
Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Sunday 22 March 2009 23:00:07 Momesso Andrea wrote:
> > On Sun, 22 Mar 2009 22:35:35 +0200
> >
> > Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > > On Sunday 22 March 2009 22:15:14 Momesso Andrea wrote:
>
> > > Your data is safe if you do exactly the steps
On Sun, 22 Mar 2009 22:18:09 -0500, Dale wrote:
> I'm not real familiar with aliases but know what it is. If you use the
> alias method, how would you disable it for a one time run?
If you gave the alias the same name as the command, just use the full
path to the command to call it directly. Bu
On Mon, 23 Mar 2009 08:57:08 +0100, Momesso Andrea wrote:
> It looks more like a workaround than a solution. If my non native
> English understood it well, it suggests to backup everything, recreate
> the pv for the whole size, and then restore from backup.
Since you currently have plenty of free
On Mon, 23 Mar 2009 08:57:19 +
Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Mar 2009 08:57:08 +0100, Momesso Andrea wrote:
>
> > It looks more like a workaround than a solution. If my non native
> > English understood it well, it suggests to backup everything,
> > recreate the pv for the whole size, an
On Mon, 23 Mar 2009 10:07:59 +0100, Momesso Andrea wrote:
> > Since you currently have plenty of free space, you don't have to take
> > the system out of service to do a backup. Create a new PV in sda4 and
> > run pvmove, then remove and recreate the PV on sda3 and pvmove the
> > data back. Then y
On Mon, 23 Mar 2009 09:31:20 +
Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Mar 2009 10:07:59 +0100, Momesso Andrea wrote:
>
> > > Since you currently have plenty of free space, you don't have to
> > > take the system out of service to do a backup. Create a new PV in
> > > sda4 and run pvmove, then rem
I never said LVM would do data recovery or provide Data Integrity - thats the
job of the soft-RAID - though even that won't prevent PEBKAC errors (e.g.
delete file).
And LVM adds more than a 'little' complexity.
If I had just lost the drive, I would have known exactly what I had lost as I
wou
2009/3/19 Neil Bothwick :
> On Thu, 19 Mar 2009 13:10:35 +0100, rdkrsr wrote:
>
> I have a P5B with working sound and these are my sound settings
Thanks for your configs. I checked again, but I must admit that I
probably had a mistake in the mixer settings. But I'm quite sure, that
I didn't find t
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 4:43 AM, Dale wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm not sure if the gtk+ update is relevant here but it was the only
> thing I could find that was recently upgraded that may fit. It used to
> be that if I was saving a file, picture or attachment in Seamonkey and
> created a new folder, it
Hi,
does anybody know about a patch to make lm_sensors work
with a PhenomII which uses AMD K10 for temperature sensing.
sensors-detect detects it but there is no config file for that
configuration.
Many thanks for a hint,
Helmut.
--
Helmut Jarausch
Lehrstuhl fuer Numerische Mathematik
RWTH -
Paul Hartman wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 4:43 AM, Dale wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm not sure if the gtk+ update is relevant here but it was the only
>> thing I could find that was recently upgraded that may fit. It used to
>> be that if I was saving a file, picture or attachment in Seamonkey
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 10:16 AM, Helmut Jarausch
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> does anybody know about a patch to make lm_sensors work
> with a PhenomII which uses AMD K10 for temperature sensing.
>
> sensors-detect detects it but there is no config file for that
> configuration.
>
> Many thanks for a hint,
>
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 10:18 AM, Dale wrote:
> Paul Hartman wrote:
>> On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 4:43 AM, Dale wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'm not sure if the gtk+ update is relevant here but it was the only
>>> thing I could find that was recently upgraded that may fit. It used to
>>> be that if I
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 10:33 AM, Paul Hartman
wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 10:18 AM, Dale wrote:
>> Paul Hartman wrote:
>>> On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 4:43 AM, Dale wrote:
>>>
Hi,
I'm not sure if the gtk+ update is relevant here but it was the only
thing I could find that w
Has anyone any ideas? The syslog-ng is the usually the first line
reported by top:
4097 root 20 0 3120 1060 708 R 48.3 0.1 677:46.38 syslog-ng
The files in /var/log seem to be growing at an expected slow pace and
aren't reporting anything unexpected. I followed a 'howto' and have
Paul Hartman wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 10:33 AM, Paul Hartman
> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 10:18 AM, Dale wrote:
>>
>>> Paul Hartman wrote:
>>>
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 4:43 AM, Dale wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm not sure if the gtk+ updat
Hi group,
I did eix-sync and upgraded portage but when I try to upgrade gentoo-sources
portage wants to get v2.6.27 and for tuxonice-sources it goes for v2.6.24.
How do I tell portage to get the latest packages?
Maxim
__
Y
maxim wexler wrote:
Hi group,
I did eix-sync and upgraded portage but when I try to upgrade gentoo-sources
portage wants to get v2.6.27 and for tuxonice-sources it goes for v2.6.24.
How do I tell portage to get the latest packages?
By keywording them. By default, portage only installed late
maxim wexler schrieb am 23.03.2009 17:08:
> I did eix-sync and upgraded portage but when I try to upgrade gentoo-sources
> portage wants to get v2.6.27 and for tuxonice-sources it goes for v2.6.24.
>
> How do I tell portage to get the latest packages?
These are the latest stable versions. If you
> These are the latest stable versions. If you want testing
> versions you
> need to put the into /etc/portage/package.keywords [1].
>
> [1] http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/handbook/handbook-x86.xml?part=3&chap=3
>
Nope,
Using the model given:
app-office/gnumeric ~x86
like this:
=sys-kernel/tu
maxim wexler schrieb am 23.03.2009 18:43:
> Nope,
>
> Using the model given:
>
> app-office/gnumeric ~x86
>
> like this:
>
> =sys-kernel/tuxonice-sources-2.6.28 ~x86
>
> in package.keywords, gives the same result as above.
No wonder =sys-kernel/tuxonice-sources-2.6.28 does not exist :-) With
> >=sys-kernel/tuxonice-sources-2.6.28 ~x86
Yeah, I just found this out and rushed back but you beat me to it:)
mw
__
Be smarter than spam. See how smart SpamGuard is at giving junk email the boot
with the All-new Yahoo! M
On Sunday 22 March 2009, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> Caveat: I have no idea why this doesn't work, but if you make sda4 an
> extended partition and create sda5 as a logical with exactly the same start
> and end as you describe above, you do in fact lose all data. Obviously
> there is a difference betwe
On Sunday 22 March 2009, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Sunday 22 March 2009 21:53:25 Dale wrote:
> > Neil Bothwick wrote:
> > > On Sun, 22 Mar 2009 17:43:29 +0100 (CET), Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> > >> I normally like to have the documentation built for all packages.
> > >> Therefore I have added 'doc' t
On Monday 23 March 2009 20:16:15 Mick wrote:
> On Sunday 22 March 2009, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > Caveat: I have no idea why this doesn't work, but if you make sda4 an
> > extended partition and create sda5 as a logical with exactly the same
> > start and end as you describe above, you do in fact lo
Steve wrote:
destination sshguardproc {
program("/usr/local/sbin/sshguard"
template("$DATE $FULLHOST $MESSAGE\n"));
};
The presence of the above line is definitely what triggers the excessive
CPU usage - it is almost as-if syslog-ng is 'busy-waiting' for the
sshguard process.
Steve wrote:
This is very frustrating... having played around, the syslog-ng tends
towards using 100% CPU when my server is otherwise quiet - if, and
only if, I have the program destination... even if the destination is
not used.
Oh, and strace shows syslog-ng frantically polling file-descrip
On Monday 23 March 2009 21:27:15 Steve wrote:
> Steve wrote:
> >> destination sshguardproc {
> >> program("/usr/local/sbin/sshguard"
> >> template("$DATE $FULLHOST $MESSAGE\n"));
> >> };
>
> The presence of the above line is definitely what triggers the excessive
> CPU usage - it is
* Steve (gentoo_...@shic.co.uk) [23.03.09 20:27]:
> Steve wrote:
> >> destination sshguardproc {
> >> program("/usr/local/sbin/sshguard"
> >> template("$DATE $FULLHOST $MESSAGE\n"));
> >> };
> >>
program() only takes 1 argument: the programname.
Any thing you want to pass, you hav
Steve wrote:
Do others get this behaviour - is this a bug in syslog-ng?
Sorry for the multiple posts... a slight error on my part. The sshguard
process wasn't running - a /bin/sh process trying to spawn it was
running (there was no link from /usr/local... to the binary) and when
the binary
Sebastian Günther wrote:
program() only takes 1 argument: the programname.
There aren't two arguments (no comma) - and, yes, the syntax is odd -
but it is exactly what is given by the sshguard man page - and seems to
be confirmed by the syslog-ng manual, too.
BTW: Just curious: you do not us
Alan McKinnon wrote:
In short: top lies,
On this occasion, top was telling the truth. ;)
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 2:49 PM, Steve wrote:
> Steve wrote:
>>
>> Do others get this behaviour - is this a bug in syslog-ng?
>
> Sorry for the multiple posts... a slight error on my part. The sshguard
> process wasn't running - a /bin/sh process trying to spawn it was running
> (there was no lin
Hi group,
I was planning to put the i686-2008.0-LiveCD-installer on a USB stick and
install it on a Asus 900A eeePC. But I understand the kernel on the CD is
http://ca.answers.yahoo.com
maxim wexler schrieb am 23.03.2009 22:31:
> I was planning to put the i686-2008.0-LiveCD-installer on a USB stick and
> install it on a Asus 900A eeePC. But I understand the kernel on the CD is
> wifi. Can someone confirm this?
>
> If true, can I simply add the driver after the fact? Any body
Daniel Pielmeier schrieb am 23.03.2009 22:40:
> You may want to take a look at the SystemRescueCd [1] afaik it is based
> on gentoo and more up to date. It is also possible to install it on a
> live-cd.
Of course I want to say. You can install it on an usb-stick :-)
signature.asc
Description: O
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Daniel Pielmeier wrote:
> maxim wexler schrieb am 23.03.2009 18:43:
>> Nope,
>>
>> Using the model given:
>>
>> app-office/gnumeric ~x86
>>
>> like this:
>>
>> =sys-kernel/tuxonice-sources-2.6.28 ~x86
>>
>> in package.keywords, gives the same result a
On Mon, 23 Mar 2009 22:40:30 +0100, Daniel Pielmeier wrote:
> > I was planning to put the i686-2008.0-LiveCD-installer on a USB stick
> > and install it on a Asus 900A eeePC. But I understand the kernel on
> > the CD is > eee's on-board wifi. Can someone confirm this?
> >
> > If true, can I sim
Albert Hopkins wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-03-22 at 22:18 -0500, Dale wrote:
>
>> Neil Bothwick wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, 22 Mar 2009 19:26:40 -0500, Dale wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> emerge -pvDu --reinstall changed-use @world
>>
>> ??? Certainly a lot more typing. ;-)
>>
2009/3/23 Dale :
> Oh, OK. If it is set up to add that
> option, how do you tell it not to use it?
alias ls='/bin/ls --color'
alias l='ls -l'
With these aliases in your .bashrc (or whatever is appropriate in your
environment), you can now use 'ls' and 'l'. Of course, you already had
'ls' (name
Hello,
My gentoo system has a problem.
It has not mounted sysfs while boot process.
I have to do mount sysfs by my hand now.
Of course, udev rc scripts has line of "need sysfs". And udev rc script was
added in sysinit service.
So I would like to know who mounts sysfs when Gentoo in boot process i
On Tue, 2009-03-24 at 10:38 +0900, SOrCErEr wrote:
> Hello,
>
> My gentoo system has a problem.
> It has not mounted sysfs while boot process.
> I have to do mount sysfs by my hand now.
>
> Of course, udev rc scripts has line of "need sysfs". And udev rc
> script was added in sysinit service.
> S
On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 18:58 -0500, Dale wrote:
> Albert Hopkins wrote:
> > On Sun, 2009-03-22 at 22:18 -0500, Dale wrote:
> >
> >> Neil Bothwick wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Sun, 22 Mar 2009 19:26:40 -0500, Dale wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >> emerge -pvDu --reinstall changed-use @world
Man. Is this thread really going to continue??
On 3/23/09, Albert Hopkins wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 18:58 -0500, Dale wrote:
>> Albert Hopkins wrote:
>> > On Sun, 2009-03-22 at 22:18 -0500, Dale wrote:
>> >
>> >> Neil Bothwick wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> On Sun, 22 Mar 2009 19:26:40 -0500, Dale wrot
2009/3/24 Albert Hopkins
> On Tue, 2009-03-24 at 10:38 +0900, SOrCErEr wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > My gentoo system has a problem.
> > It has not mounted sysfs while boot process.
> > I have to do mount sysfs by my hand now.
> >
> > Of course, udev rc scripts has line of "need sysfs". And udev rc
>
Hilco Wijbenga wrote:
> 2009/3/23 Dale :
>
>> Oh, OK.If it is set up to add that
>> option, how do you tell it not to use it?
>>
>
> alias ls='/bin/ls --color'
> alias l='ls -l'
>
> With these aliases in your .bashrc (or whatever is appropriate in your
> environment), you can now use 'l
On Tuesday 24 March 2009 05:01:36 SOrCErEr wrote:
> No, that isn't. That file exists.
> So I tested like below.
>
> /etc/init.d/udev stop
> /etc/init.d/sysfs stop
> /etc/init.d/udev start
> /etc/init.d/sysfs status
>
> Result is
> "* status: stopped"
I had this problem recently. I had updated to u
James Skinner wrote:
> Man. Is this thread really going to continue??
>
>
If you are not careful, you will get someone on the no top posting
soapbox. LOL This is a educational channel and there are teachers and
learners. I'm the learner. We can however change the subject line if
you wish?
50 matches
Mail list logo
