Am 23.07.2010 05:51, schrieb Walter Dnes:
I had a similar situation. I use one Windows app, that runs in WINE.
WINE will not build without multi-lib support on a 64-bit install. I
ended up installing QEMU-KVM, and then a 32-bit Gentoo guest inside
that. Having done it once, the second time
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 01:37:27PM +0200, Andrea Momesso wrote
> And yes, I had read the AMD64 FAQs before installing, and I've been
> happy with no-multilib for quita a while. I still have adobe flash
> 10.0.45.2-r2 installed, but I understand it has serius security
> problems, and I had to mask
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 8:35 PM, Bill Kenworthy wrote:
> Just saw a mention about the lightspark flash player. Is any one using
> it and can comment on it being a viable replacement for adobe flash for
> general web browsing?
It seems to be in very early stages. So far there's no flash player
no
On Fri, 2010-07-23 at 09:35 +0800, Bill Kenworthy wrote:
> Just saw a mention about the lightspark flash player. Is any one
> using
> it and can comment on it being a viable replacement for adobe flash
> for
> general web browsing? There is also some comment here
> (http://lwn.net/Articles/389266
Dale gmail.com> writes:
> Sent the screenshot offlist. Should get it soon. If not, check the
> spam bucket.
Got it.
thx,
James
Just saw a mention about the lightspark flash player. Is any one using
it and can comment on it being a viable replacement for adobe flash for
general web browsing? There is also some comment here
(http://lwn.net/Articles/389266/) on various linuc flash players.
I can test specific sites but hop
Hilco Wijbenga writes:
> On 22 July 2010 16:08, Alex Schuster wrote:
> > I prefer NX over VNC because of its efficiency, and because it is
> > more intelligent, but I think it has no mode to let two people
> > access the same session at once. So I (being remote) tried starting
> > a session with
On 22 July 2010 16:08, Alex Schuster wrote:
> Hilco Wijbenga writes:
>
>> I would like to do remote pair programming with somebody on a
>> non-Linux box. It seems that NoMachine NX or TightVNC would allow me
>> to do so. Great.
>
> I prefer NX over VNC because of its efficiency, and because it is
Openvpn tunnel - treat the endpoints as a network connecting the two of
you. If one end is public, connect direct (easier), or use your server
as a server and the ends as clients and route between at the server end
- can be fun (not) to get to work :)
Zebedee is a port based tunnel when only a si
Hilco Wijbenga writes:
> I would like to do remote pair programming with somebody on a
> non-Linux box. It seems that NoMachine NX or TightVNC would allow me
> to do so. Great.
I prefer NX over VNC because of its efficiency, and because it is more
intelligent, but I think it has no mode to let tw
James wrote:
Dale gmail.com> writes:
I think that is in about:config. I think if you type in "reply" in the
search field, you will be able to see the setting. If needed, I can
email you a screen shot of mine for you to compare, off list of course.
This worked
thanks...
The
Hi all,
I would like to do remote pair programming with somebody on a
non-Linux box. It seems that NoMachine NX or TightVNC would allow me
to do so. Great.
My problem is that I don't have a routable IP address. My ISP gives me
a 192.x.x.x IP which is sort of nice because the bad guys can't see me
Dale gmail.com> writes:
> I think that is in about:config. I think if you type in "reply" in the
> search field, you will be able to see the setting. If needed, I can
> email you a screen shot of mine for you to compare, off list of course.
This worked
thanks...
> The same thing happened to
On Thursday 22 July 2010 13:30:49 Bill Longman wrote:
> On 7/22/10, Arnau Bria wrote:
> > On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 10:53:54 +0200
> >
> > Alan McKinnon wrote:
> >> On Thursday 22 July 2010 10:04:46 Arnau Bria wrote:
> >> > Hi all,
> >> >
> >> > long time since last update. I was trying to update my s
On 2010-07-22, walt wrote:
> On 07/22/2010 02:04 PM, Bill Longman wrote:
>> On 07/22/2010 12:49 PM, walt wrote:
>>> On 07/21/2010 03:18 PM, Bill Longman wrote:
>>>
Might I suggest a small hardware upgrade:
http://www.supermicro.com/Aplus/motherboard/Opteron6100/SR56x0/H8QGi-F.cfm
>>
James wrote:
Hello,
Well, I just upgraded to Seamonkey 2 for email. It's first
curve ball for me is this error.
When I reply to a message in my inbox, it puts this at the
beginning in the message body
"chrome://messenger/locale/messengercompose/composeMsgs.properties:"
So where do I star
On 07/22/2010 02:04 PM, Bill Longman wrote:
On 07/22/2010 12:49 PM, walt wrote:
On 07/21/2010 03:18 PM, Bill Longman wrote:
Might I suggest a small hardware upgrade:
http://www.supermicro.com/Aplus/motherboard/Opteron6100/SR56x0/H8QGi-F.cfm
Hey, where's the parallel port for my Epson MX-8
Hello,
Well, I just upgraded to Seamonkey 2 for email. It's first
curve ball for me is this error.
When I reply to a message in my inbox, it puts this at the
beginning in the message body
"chrome://messenger/locale/messengercompose/composeMsgs.properties:"
So where do I start hacking and s
On 07/22/2010 12:49 PM, walt wrote:
> On 07/21/2010 03:18 PM, Bill Longman wrote:
>
>> Might I suggest a small hardware upgrade:
>>
>>
>> http://www.supermicro.com/Aplus/motherboard/Opteron6100/SR56x0/H8QGi-F.cfm
>>
>
> Hey, where's the parallel port for my Epson MX-80 printer?
You're aging yo
On 2010-07-22, walt wrote:
> On 07/21/2010 03:18 PM, Bill Longman wrote:
>
>> Might I suggest a small hardware upgrade:
>>
>> http://www.supermicro.com/Aplus/motherboard/Opteron6100/SR56x0/H8QGi-F.cfm
>
> Hey, where's the parallel port for my Epson MX-80 printer?
Ah, quit whining. At least it
Daniel Troeder admin-box.com> writes:
> $ sudo aticonfig --initial --input=/etc/X11/xorg.conf
OK
That worked..
thx,
James
On 07/21/2010 03:18 PM, Bill Longman wrote:
Might I suggest a small hardware upgrade:
http://www.supermicro.com/Aplus/motherboard/Opteron6100/SR56x0/H8QGi-F.cfm
Hey, where's the parallel port for my Epson MX-80 printer?
On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 11:56:50 +0200 Andrea Momesso
wrote:
> That's impossible, isn't it?
>
> Swithcing profile and reemerging everithing isn't gonna work? Even from a
> chroot?
>
> Should I reinstall a new stage from scratch? Adobe stopped providing
> flash for linux 64 bit, and I some of the s
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 6:37 AM, Andrea Momesso
wrote:
> I still have adobe flash 10.0.45.2-r2 installed, but I understand it has
> serius
> security problems, and I had to mask all higher versions.
I think given the track record of security problems in flash player
(and java and firefox and eve
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 1:11 AM, Mick wrote:
> On Thursday 22 July 2010 05:14:08 David Relson wrote:
>> /var/log/messages has indicated a slew of XFS problems on an external
>> USB hard drive (see attachment). These look pretty fatal. Anybody
>> think the file system is recoverable?
>
> You'll h
On 07/22/2010 01:09 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> Looks like a quad cpu, each one dual core. I've got one of those in the Data
> Centre next door and each core is running that new fancy hyper-threading that
> actually works:
It's quad CPU TWELVE core. Just putting four CPUs into the thing will
cost
On Thursday 22 July 2010 14:37:04 Mr. Jarry wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 10:32 PM, Alan McKinnon
wrote:
> > I assume you have a perfectly legitimate reason for still using sendmail
>
> in
>
> > this day and age?
>
> For ~10 years I've been a satisfied sendmail-user. Does it count for a
> le
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 10:32 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> I assume you have a perfectly legitimate reason for still using sendmail
in
> this day and age?
For ~10 years I've been a satisfied sendmail-user. Does it count for a
legitimate reason?
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 1:06 AM, Jason Carson wrote:
On 7/22/10, Arnau Bria wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 10:53:54 +0200
> Alan McKinnon wrote:
>
>> On Thursday 22 July 2010 10:04:46 Arnau Bria wrote:
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > long time since last update. I was trying to update my system and it
>> > failed at netpbm with this error:
>>
>> Yes, I can see
On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 10:53:54 +0200
Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Thursday 22 July 2010 10:04:46 Arnau Bria wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > long time since last update. I was trying to update my system and it
> > failed at netpbm with this error:
>
> Yes, I can see it was a long time ago :-)
I really don
On Thursday 22 July 2010 11:13:23 Alex Schuster wrote:
> Nikos Chantziaras writes:
> > On 07/22/2010 12:56 PM, Andrea Momesso wrote:
> > > That's impossible, isn't it?
>
> I think so.
>
> > > Swithcing profile and reemerging everithing isn't gonna work? Even
> > > from a chroot?
> > >
> > > Shou
On Thursday 22 July 2010 10:19:21 Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> On 07/22/2010 12:56 PM, Andrea Momesso wrote:
> > That's impossible, isn't it?
> >
> > Swithcing profile and reemerging everithing isn't gonna work? Even from a
> > chroot?
> >
> > Should I reinstall a new stage from scratch? Adobe stop
Nikos Chantziaras writes:
> On 07/22/2010 12:56 PM, Andrea Momesso wrote:
> > That's impossible, isn't it?
I think so.
> > Swithcing profile and reemerging everithing isn't gonna work? Even
> > from a chroot?
> >
> > Should I reinstall a new stage from scratch? Adobe stopped providing
> > flash
On Thursday 22 July 2010 10:04:46 Arnau Bria wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> long time since last update. I was trying to update my system and it
> failed at netpbm with this error:
Yes, I can see it was a long time ago :-)
You hit the jpeg issue and that was a while back. We've had the linpng issue
since
Hi again,
a revdep-rebuil --library libjpeg.so.7 solved my problem.
now I should be able to continue with my update.
sorry for the noise.
Cheers,
Arnau
On 07/22/2010 12:56 PM, Andrea Momesso wrote:
That's impossible, isn't it?
Swithcing profile and reemerging everithing isn't gonna work? Even from a
chroot?
Should I reinstall a new stage from scratch? Adobe stopped providing flash for
linux 64 bit, and I some of the sites I need to visit for
On Thursday 22 July 2010 02:03:15 Dale wrote:
> Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > On Thursday 22 July 2010 00:18:05 Bill Longman wrote:
> >> On 07/21/2010 12:39 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> >>> On Wednesday 21 July 2010 17:49:46 Bill Longman wrote:
> And to play devil's advocate, I'll chime in with my ex
Am 21.07.2010 20:35, schrieb Bill Longman:
> On 06/23/2010 01:59 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
>>> - From /proc/cpuinfo:
>>> address sizes : 36 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
>>>
>>> That's only 8GB physical, but that's probably a reasonable limit at
>>> the moment.
>
> $ units -1 '2^36 by
Hi all,
long time since last update. I was trying to update my system and it
failed at netpbm with this error:
/usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.3.4/../../../../i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld:
warning: libjpeg.so.7, needed
by /usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.3.4/../../../libjasper.so, not
found (try usi
That's impossible, isn't it?
Swithcing profile and reemerging everithing isn't gonna work? Even from a
chroot?
Should I reinstall a new stage from scratch? Adobe stopped providing flash for
linux 64 bit, and I some of the sites I need to visit for work need it.
Mantaining a chroot is not w
On Thursday 22 July 2010 05:14:08 David Relson wrote:
> /var/log/messages has indicated a slew of XFS problems on an external
> USB hard drive (see attachment). These look pretty fatal. Anybody
> think the file system is recoverable?
You'll have to try to recover it, to see if it is possible: x
41 matches
Mail list logo
