On Fri, 3 Dec 2010 01:37:26 +, Stroller wrote:
> > Are you using baselayout 1 or 2? ISTR this came with BL2.
>
> Ooooh, I assumed the cool kids weren't seeing it because we use
> labels. ;)
I thought the cool kids used LVM :)
I've just checked and two boxes that use BL1 don't do this, onl
On 3/12/2010, at 8:20am, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Dec 2010 01:37:26 +, Stroller wrote:
>
>>> Are you using baselayout 1 or 2? ISTR this came with BL2.
>>
>> Ooooh, I assumed the cool kids weren't seeing it because we use
>> labels. ;)
>
> I thought the cool kids used LVM :)
The c
Hi,
I am considering a bit of virtualization and started playing with XEN.
I have three questions:
I use a 64bit system with probably mostly 64bit guests. Am I right
that I do not need the -mno-tls-direct-seg-refs CFLAG and can clone
real machines? My test system didn't show any performance hangs.
Hi,
I read in an earlier posting that to get VRDP Support I need VirtualBox-Bin
instead of -OSE is this correct?
Konstantin
--
Dipl-Inf. Konstantin Agouros aka Elwood Blues. Internet: elw...@agouros.de
Altersheimerstr. 1, 81545 Muenchen, Germany. Tel +49 89 69370185
-
On 2010-12-03, Jacob Todd wrote:
> Gotta love gcc!
It's not gcc's fault.
I use gcc on other platforms to create static binaries and don't see
any noticable overhead.
> If you want real static binaries on a unix-ish os, use plan 9.
Except that's not what I want. I want a static binary on Linu
Iirc there a bug in glibc that makes it almost impossible to create static
binaries with it. I can't look the the sources of that info atm, but it be
easily found with google. Do the other platforms you use gcc to build static
binaries with use a different libc?
On Dec 3, 2010 11:14 AM, "Grant Edwa
On Fri, 03 Dec 2010 03:10:02 +0100, Grant Edwards wrote about
[gentoo-user] How to build a static application binary?:
>It seems that "gcc -static" was broken sometime in the last few years.
>
>This used to produce reasonable results:
>
>-tiny.c-
I ran 'netstat -lp' on a system of mine and found a couple of strange things.
tcp0 0 1.2.3.4.st:https *:* LISTEN
2929/apache2
udp0 0 1.2.3.4.stat:ntp *:*
3203/ntpd
1.2.3.4 is not the IP address that actually appeared, but I don't
recognize the one
Hi,
I googled this and found some other people asking the same question...
But I didn't find the answer.
I am using linux kernel 2.6.36.1 vanilla to run on a AMD Phenom X6
1090T/ASUS Crosshair IV Formula system.
I enabled "ondemand" CPU frequency scaling givernor in the kernel and
"Cool'n' Quie
I'm told I need to run mysqld with --skip-grant-tables. I'm used to
using Gentoo's mysql initscript. Should 'mysqld --skip-grant-tables'
work?
>>>
>>> You can add it to /etc/mysql/my.cnf and restart. Remove it and restart again
>>> when you've finished.
>>>
>>> kashani
>>
>> That w
On Fri, 3 Dec 2010 11:14:01 -0800 Grant wrote:
> I ran 'netstat -lp' on a system of mine and found a couple of strange
> things.
>
> tcp0 0 1.2.3.4.st:https *:* LISTEN
> 2929/apache2
> udp0 0 1.2.3.4.stat:ntp *:*
> 3203/ntpd
>
> 1.2.3.4 is not t
On Friday 03 December 2010 15:06:44 Konstantinos Agouros wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I read in an earlier posting that to get VRDP Support I need VirtualBox-Bin
> instead of -OSE is this correct?
>
> Konstantin
Yes, according to this page:
http://www.virtualbox.org/wiki/Editions
--
Regards,
Mick
signat
On Friday 03 December 2010, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I googled this and found some other people asking the same question...
> But I didn't find the answer.
>
> I am using linux kernel 2.6.36.1 vanilla to run on a AMD Phenom X6
> 1090T/ASUS Crosshair IV Formula system.
>
> I enabled "
>> I ran 'netstat -lp' on a system of mine and found a couple of strange
>> things.
>>
>> tcp 0 0 1.2.3.4.st:https *:* LISTEN
>> 2929/apache2
>> udp 0 0 1.2.3.4.stat:ntp *:*
>> 3203/ntpd
>>
>> 1.2.3.4 is not the IP address that actually appeared, but
On Fri, 3 Dec 2010 13:18:54 -0800 Grant wrote:
> Ah, so much better. Thank you. Still getting those "warning, got
> bogus unix line." lines instead of UNIX sockets though.
Google shows that this message is caused by netstat when "some unix domain
socket is changing while being viewed", which r
On 2010-12-03, Jacob Todd wrote:
> On Dec 3, 2010 11:14 AM, "Grant Edwards" wrote:
>> On 2010-12-03, Jacob Todd wrote:
>>
>>> Gotta love gcc!
>>
>> It's not gcc's fault.
>
> Iirc there a bug in glibc that makes it almost impossible to create
> static binaries with it.
Yes, that's my understand
On 2010-12-03, David W Noon wrote:
> What you are seeing is a lot of glibc routines being included by the
> linkage editor. These handle all sorts of conditions that will
> likely never occur in your program.
>
> Try using a smaller C library, like uclibc or klibc. They might not
> work as well
Apparently, though unproven, at 00:37 on Saturday 04 December 2010, Grant
Edwards did opine thusly:
> On 2010-12-03, David W Noon wrote:
> > What you are seeing is a lot of glibc routines being included by the
> > linkage editor. These handle all sorts of conditions that will
> > likely never o
Volker Armin Hemmann [10-12-04 01:24]:
> On Friday 03 December 2010, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I googled this and found some other people asking the same question...
> > But I didn't find the answer.
> >
> > I am using linux kernel 2.6.36.1 vanilla to run on a AMD Phenom X6
> >
Re the discussion on cgroups on the 24/25 november - on my old AMD
barton 2500+ desktop - in the past a load of anything more than 5 made
it very painful to use. Add in running windows in a qemu vm at the same
time (all in 1.5G ram) and its almost unusable as an interactive
desktop.
Now, with Flo
Dale wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Doing some research on building me a new rig. I have ran into sort
of a
> hick up. The socket types are confusing me here. This is the mobo
that
> I *might* be getting.
>
>
http://www.msi.com/index.php?func=prodmbspec&maincat_no=1&cat2_no=171&cat3_no=&prod_no=1856
>
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 4:41 PM, William Kenworthy wrote:
> Re the discussion on cgroups on the 24/25 november - on my old AMD
> barton 2500+ desktop - in the past a load of anything more than 5 made
> it very painful to use. Add in running windows in a qemu vm at the same
> time (all in 1.5G ram)
>> Ah, so much better. Thank you. Still getting those "warning, got
>> bogus unix line." lines instead of UNIX sockets though.
>
> Google shows that this message is caused by netstat when "some unix domain
> socket is changing while being viewed", which really isn't much help.
>
> But: are you us
masterprometheus wrote:
Dale wrote:
Hi,
Doing some research on building me a new rig. I have ran into sort
of a
hick up. The socket types are confusing me here. This is the mobo
that
I *might* be getting.
http://www.msi.com/index.php?func=prodmbspec&main
On Fri, 2010-12-03 at 17:20 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 4:41 PM, William Kenworthy wrote:
> > Re the discussion on cgroups on the 24/25 november - on my old AMD
> > barton 2500+ desktop - in the past a load of anything more than 5 made
> > it very painful to use. Add in run
On 12/03/2010 05:38 PM, Dale wrote:
> masterprometheus wrote:
>
> Thanks for confirming that the coolers will fit. I did some googling
> but it just wasn't making sense to me yet. I found a site later on that
> said most coolers used different "adapters" to work with different
> sockets if neede
On 2010-12-03, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> Apparently, though unproven, at 00:37 on Saturday 04 December 2010, Grant
> Edwards did opine thusly:
>
>> On 2010-12-03, David W Noon wrote:
>> > What you are seeing is a lot of glibc routines being included by the
>> > linkage editor. These handle all sor
27 matches
Mail list logo
