On Wednesday 13 April 2011 01:45:43 Bill Kenworthy wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-04-12 at 14:52 -0500, Paul Hartman wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 12:31 PM, Grant wrote:
> > > Sometimes the ext3 forced volume check at boot triggers at an
> > > inopportune time. Is there a way to skip it and let it ru
> As I try to run as (normal) user -terminal-, does not show me any output, no
> errors, no message.
What happens when you run X as the root user? Do you get the same
error? That is, log into a regular system terminal, start X, and run
LO.
On Tue, 2011-04-12 at 14:52 -0500, Paul Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 12:31 PM, Grant wrote:
> > Sometimes the ext3 forced volume check at boot triggers at an
> > inopportune time. Is there a way to skip it and let it run at the
> > next boot?
>
> Not once it has started, but there ar
On 12 April 2011 04:09, Philip Webb wrote:
> 110412 Carlos Sura wrote:
> > On 12 April 2011 00:00, Stroller wrote:
> >> Is this when you click on the libreoffice icon, or are you opening
> >> terminal window and running `/path/to/bin/libreoffice`?
> >> The latter should (hopefully) output some e
Paul Hartman:
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 2:52 PM, Paul Hartman
>> If it's an ext[123] you can use tune2fs -i 0 to set the auto-check
>> interval to never.
>
> oops, I of course meant 234 not 123 :)
;)
But i prefer setting the interval to 1000 with 'tune2fs -c'.
| It is strongly recommended that
Hi all,
For my home network I am generally using wireless to get connected to the
network and the internet.
However for copying some large files I use the wire.
That means I get 2 IPs in the same range.
And both interfaces get the same metric : 0.
I found out I can modify the metric for the def
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 2:52 PM, Paul Hartman
wrote:
> If it's an ext[123] you can use tune2fs -i 0 to set the auto-check
> interval to never.
oops, I of course meant 234 not 123 :)
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 12:31 PM, Grant wrote:
> Sometimes the ext3 forced volume check at boot triggers at an
> inopportune time. Is there a way to skip it and let it run at the
> next boot?
Not once it has started, but there are some ways to avoid it running
in the first place:
Add "fastboot"
- Original Message
> From: Grant
> To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
> Sent: Tue, April 12, 2011 3:29:35 PM
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Can a forced volume check be interrupted?
>
> >> >> Probably, but why would you want to? it fixes any errors, and makes the
> >>file
> >> >> system re
>> >> Probably, but why would you want to? it fixes any errors, and makes the
>>file
>> >> system relatively clean again so that things function well - and things
>>don't
>> >> get lost.
>> >> If you skip it, you risk data corruption on disk.
>> >
>> > That misses the point. I have rebooted som
- Original Message
> From: Grant
> >> Probably, but why would you want to? it fixes any errors, and makes the
>file
> >> system relatively clean again so that things function well - and things
>don't
> >> get lost.
> >> If you skip it, you risk data corruption on disk.
> >
> > That
>> Probably, but why would you want to? it fixes any errors, and makes the file
>> system relatively clean again so that things function well - and things don't
>> get lost.
>> If you skip it, you risk data corruption on disk.
>
> That misses the point. I have rebooted sometimes just for a quick
>
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 10:50:56AM -0700, BRM wrote:
> Probably, but why would you want to? it fixes any errors, and makes the file
> system relatively clean again so that things function well - and things don't
> get lost.
> If you skip it, you risk data corruption on disk.
That misses the poin
Probably, but why would you want to? it fixes any errors, and makes the file
system relatively clean again so that things function well - and things don't
get lost.
If you skip it, you risk data corruption on disk.
If you know it's going to run, then you can do one of two things:
1) I believe th
Sometimes the ext3 forced volume check at boot triggers at an
inopportune time. Is there a way to skip it and let it run at the
next boot?
- Grant
James tampabay.rr.com> writes:
> > I've found GRUB's handling of symlinks to be variable at best. Try
> > searching for the real file.
All the files are in /boot/grub:
(chroot) slam grub # ls
defaultgrub.conf minix_stage1_5 stage2.old
device.map grub.conf.bak reiser
Hello list,
I've a weird one here. I'm rebuilding my local server on an Atom N270 box and
I've reached the point of installing phpmyadmin on it to manage a MySQL
database
I'm developing.
Three different browsers have no trouble displaying table structures, data, the
database design and the da
On Tuesday 12 April 2011 15:57:26 Dale wrote:
> As for making things the same, that my not always be a good idea
> either.
I might add a quotation from Ralph Waldo Emerson: "a foolish preoccupation with
consistency is the hobgoblin of small minds."
--
Rgds
Peter
On Tuesday 12 April 2011 09:57:26 Dale wrote:
> Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > On Tuesday 12 April 2011 15:10:52 James wrote:
> >> Stroller stellar.eclipse.co.uk> writes:
> >>> There's no need for extents on such a small partition,
> >>> nor journalling (because you write to /boot so
> >>> rarely, the
Peter Humphrey wrote:
On Tuesday 12 April 2011 15:10:52 James wrote:
Stroller stellar.eclipse.co.uk> writes:
There's no need for extents on such a small partition,
nor journalling (because you write to /boot so
rarely, the likelihood of a power failure when you're
doing so is mi
On Tuesday 12 April 2011 15:10:52 James wrote:
> Stroller stellar.eclipse.co.uk> writes:
> > There's no need for extents on such a small partition,
> > nor journalling (because you write to /boot so
> > rarely, the likelihood of a power failure when you're
> > doing so is minuscule).
>
> Yea, su
Neil Bothwick digimed.co.uk> writes:
> > > If /boot is on a separate partition, you should be using
It is.
> > > find /grub/stage1
grub> find /grub/stage1
Error 15: File not found
grub> find /boot/grub/stage1
Error 15: File not found
> > If the symlink is there for boot -> /boot -- and it i
Stroller stellar.eclipse.co.uk> writes:
> > James, if I'm not wrong (legacy) sys-boot/grub-0.97-r10
> > does not have drivers for ext4. Not sure if there's
> > a patch for it, or if grub2 can boot from ext4.
Mick, that's what I was wondering.
No evidence either way, that I could find
so I d
110412 Carlos Sura wrote:
> On 12 April 2011 00:00, Stroller wrote:
>> Is this when you click on the libreoffice icon, or are you opening
>> terminal window and running `/path/to/bin/libreoffice`?
>> The latter should (hopefully) output some error messages.
I agree : make sure you start it from a
On Mon, 11 Apr 2011 21:09:17 -0500, Mark Shields wrote:
> > If /boot is on a separate partition, you should be using
> >
> > find /grub/stage1
> If the symlink is there for boot -> /boot -- and it is by default --
> both work.
I've found GRUB's handling of symlinks to be variable at best. Try
se
On Mon, 11 Apr 2011 22:49:24 -0600, Carlos Sura wrote:
> When I try to run LibreOffice as normal user, I can see the splash (of
> libreoffice) but nothing more... Cannot use any libreoffice
> application, it just don't work, fas as I can see is the libreoffice
> splash. No errors (as normal user),
26 matches
Mail list logo
