On Oct 14, 2013 6:04 PM, "Tanstaafl" wrote:
>
> On 2013-10-13 5:49 PM, Dale wrote:
>>
>> Talk about putting some stuff on tmpfs. O_O I have always wanted to
>> copy the tree to tmpfs and run "time emerge -uvaDN world". Just to see
>> how fast it will go. lol
>
>
> I remember once I worked for
Hello James,
yes, I've also had this problem. Check the permissions of the
TeamSpeak3-Client-linux_amd64-3.0.13.run file you downloaded and moved
to /usr/portage/distfiles. This file is maybe still owned by your user.
After I changed the owner and group of the file to portage and set the
permissi
On 10/14/2013 10:21 PM, jo...@antarean.org wrote:
> james wrote:
>
> On 10/14/2013 04:06 PM, walt wrote:
>
> On 10/14/2013 01:27 PM, james wrote:
>
> Hey List,
>
> This is my first post, have patience.
>
>
> Has anyone gotten this problem when
On Oct 15, 2013 10:51 AM, "Dale" wrote:
>
> Howdy,
>
> I ordered the new mobo as much as I needed to wait. The mobo is the
> same brand but a different chipset and a couple other things are
> different. I have already built a kernel for those changes. I plan to
> put everything on the old mobo
james wrote:
>On 10/14/2013 04:06 PM, walt wrote:
>> On 10/14/2013 01:27 PM, james wrote:
>>> Hey List,
>>>
>>> This is my first post, have patience.
>>>
>>>
>>> Has anyone gotten this problem when updating from
>teamspeak-client-bin-3.0.12?
>>>
>> Emerging (8 of 8) media-sound/teamspeak-clien
Howdy,
I ordered the new mobo as much as I needed to wait. The mobo is the
same brand but a different chipset and a couple other things are
different. I have already built a kernel for those changes. I plan to
put everything on the old mobo on the new mobo. That includes the CPU.
I'm pretty s
On 10/14/2013 04:06 PM, walt wrote:
> On 10/14/2013 01:27 PM, james wrote:
>> Hey List,
>>
>> This is my first post, have patience.
>>
>>
>> Has anyone gotten this problem when updating from
>> teamspeak-client-bin-3.0.12?
>>
> Emerging (8 of 8) media-sound/teamspeak-client-bin-3.0.13
>> * Te
In linux.gentoo.user, allan wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 12 2013, thana...@asyr.hopto.org wrote:
>
>> on 10/12/2013 05:40 PM gottl...@nyu.edu wrote the following:
>>> copy the lvm partitions to directories on an external disk (ext3)
>>
>> What command did you use for copying?
>
> cp -ax
>
> rsync not is on
On 10/14/2013 04:31 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>
> Keep in mind the actual original purpose of a salted hash.
>
> If two users happen to use the same password[1], the hashes are the same
> and this is revealed to anyone who can read /etc/passwd[2] i.e everyone.
Ah, the single-entry rainbow table =
On 10/14/2013 01:27 PM, james wrote:
> Hey List,
>
> This is my first post, have patience.
>
>
> Has anyone gotten this problem when updating from teamspeak-client-bin-3.0.12?
>
Emerging (8 of 8) media-sound/teamspeak-client-bin-3.0.13
> * TeamSpeak3-Client-linux_amd64-3.0.13.run SHA256 S
On 14/10/2013 20:23, Tanstaafl wrote:
> On 2013-10-13 4:07 PM, Martin Vaeth
> wrote:
>> Like passwords, these sequences should better not stay the same for
>> too long...
>
> Forced changing of passwords (and I imagine the same can be said for
> port-knocking sequences, which I've never implement
On 14/10/2013 21:17, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 10/14/2013 02:49 PM, Martin Vaeth wrote:
>>
>>> Hiding the salt would just be security through obscurity.
>>
>> And yet it is stupid if you do not do it and give away a
>> huge constant factor for no advantage.
>>
>
> (I'll just agree to disagree a
Hey List,
This is my first post, have patience.
Has anyone gotten this problem when updating from teamspeak-client-bin-3.0.12?
>>> Emerging (8 of 8) media-sound/teamspeak-client-bin-3.0.13
* TeamSpeak3-Client-linux_amd64-3.0.13.run SHA256 SHA512 WHIRLPOOL size ;-) ...
Hello again,
Uwe Scholz schrieb am [Thu, 10.10.2013 10:27]:
> [...]
>
> pump emerge minitube
>
> [...]
>
> distcc[2815] ERROR: failed to connect to UNIX-DOMAIN
> /tmp/distcc-pump.boOiEs/socket: Permission denied
> distcc[2815] (dcc_build_somewhere) Warning: failed to get includes from
> incl
On 2013-10-14 2:52 PM, Martin Vaeth
wrote:
Tanstaafl wrote:
Like passwords, these sequences should better not stay the same for
too long...
Forced changing of passwords
I agreee: To do this to protect *other* users will not work.
It's a different thing if you use it for protection of your
On 10/14/2013 02:49 PM, Martin Vaeth wrote:
>
>> Hiding the salt would just be security through obscurity.
>
> And yet it is stupid if you do not do it and give away a
> huge constant factor for no advantage.
>
(I'll just agree to disagree about the rest.)
Keeping the salt secret makes your ap
Tanstaafl wrote:
>> Like passwords, these sequences should better not stay the same for
>> too long...
>
> Forced changing of passwords
I agreee: To do this to protect *other* users will not work.
It's a different thing if you use it for protection of your own data...
Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 10/14/2013 07:49 AM, Martin Vaeth wrote:
>>
>> Using yet another service with possible holes to protect a sshd?
>> In this case, I would like port knocking at least for this OpenVPN.
>
> The sensitive parts of OpenVPN are audited regularly, and it uses "SSL"
> -- publi
On 2013-10-13 4:07 PM, Martin Vaeth
wrote:
Like passwords, these sequences should better not stay the same for
too long...
Forced changing of passwords (and I imagine the same can be said for
port-knocking sequences, which I've never implemented, but am intrigued
by, although I tend to avoid
Am 14.10.2013 08:23, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
> Am 10.10.2013 16:38, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
>> I don't plan to stay with 3.8.13, this is just an intermediate step to
>> get a working config. For now I don't have any more lost hpet interrupts
>> etc and the LAN speed is fine. Emerging pa
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 03:11:30PM +0200, Silvio Siefke wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Sun, 13 Oct 2013 17:32:29 +0200 Frank Steinmetzger
> wrote:
>
> > You want to install gnat-gcc for a gcc version you don't have. You
> > have gcc 4.6.3 and 4.7.3 installed (with 4.6.3 active).
> > Unfortunately, my ei
Mick wrote:
> On Sunday 13 Oct 2013 22:49:41 Dale wrote:
>> I don't overclock so I'm not worried about that. I did it once with a
>> old Abit mobo with a AMD 2500+ CPU but it just didn't make much
difference.
>
> O/C = higher costs. You need higher frequency memory, bigger CPU/case
coolers
> and
On 10/14/2013 07:49 AM, Martin Vaeth wrote:
> Michael Orlitzky wrote:
>> Port knocking is cute, but imparts no extra security.
>
> It does, for instance if you use it to protect sshd and
> sshd turns out to be vulnerable; remember e.g. the
> security disaster with Debian.
>
>> A better, secure w
On 14/10/13 20:08, Martin Vaeth wrote:
> William Kenworthy wrote:
>>
>> If you are going to go to this bother ... why not use shorewall, create
>
> When I checked for scripts creating rules, none fulfilled my needs.
> (I do not know whether I checked shorewall at this time).
> For instance, inste
Hello,
On Sun, 13 Oct 2013 17:32:29 +0200 Frank Steinmetzger
wrote:
> You want to install gnat-gcc for a gcc version you don't have. You
> have gcc 4.6.3 and 4.7.3 installed (with 4.6.3 active).
> Unfortunately, my eix doesn't report me any gnat-gcc newer than 4.5.
> So I'm not sure how to proce
On Sunday 13 Oct 2013 22:49:41 Dale wrote:
> I don't overclock so I'm not worried about that. I did it once with a
> old Abit mobo with a AMD 2500+ CPU but it just didn't make much difference.
O/C = higher costs. You need higher frequency memory, bigger CPU/case coolers
and potentially a bigger
Tanstaafl wrote:
> On 2013-10-13 5:49 PM, Dale wrote:
>> Talk about putting some stuff on tmpfs. O_O I have always wanted to
>> copy the tree to tmpfs and run "time emerge -uvaDN world". Just to see
>> how fast it will go. lol
>
> I remember once I worked for an Apple reseller that had this
>
William Kenworthy wrote:
>
> If you are going to go to this bother ... why not use shorewall, create
When I checked for scripts creating rules, none fulfilled my needs.
(I do not know whether I checked shorewall at this time).
For instance, instead of dropping most packets, I want to reject them
Pandu Poluan wrote:
>
> Thanks, Martin! I was about to create my own preprocessor, but I'll check
> out yours first. If it's what I had planned, may I contribute, too?
Sure, patches are welcome.
Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> Port knocking is cute, but imparts no extra security.
It does, for instance if you use it to protect sshd and
sshd turns out to be vulnerable; remember e.g. the
security disaster with Debian.
> A better, secure way to achieve the same goal is with OpenVPN.
Using yet an
On 2013-10-13 5:49 PM, Dale wrote:
Talk about putting some stuff on tmpfs. O_O I have always wanted to
copy the tree to tmpfs and run "time emerge -uvaDN world". Just to see
how fast it will go. lol
I remember once I worked for an Apple reseller that had this accounting
program that requi
31 matches
Mail list logo