On 12/31/13 12:03, Bruce Hill wrote:
[snip]
The blkid output would have shown this device, it's UUID, and filesystem.
At any rate, for my flash drives I want them mounted with perms for rw for
user mingdao, so I put something like this in /etc/fstab:
baruch ~ # blkid /dev/sdc1
/dev/sdc1: LABE
On Tue, 31 Dec 2013 14:08:18 -0800
walt wrote:
> sys-fs/dosfstools includes dosfslabel, which lets you put a disk label
> on a vfat-formatted memory stick.
Thanks for this! I had been using mtools, which works, but dosfslabel
is much less annoying to use.
On 12/31/2013 08:18 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> That looks normal. Having lines in fstab for removable media is not a
> good solution in general - insert two sticks and the second one doesn't
> have a matching line (it isn't /dev/sdb1)
Having a dos label on a memory stick allows you to mount it usi
Am Dienstag, 31.12.2013 um 10:56
schrieb Joseph :
> On 12/31/13 18:47, waben...@gmail.com wrote:
> >Am Montag, 30.12.2013 um 22:03
> >schrieb Bruce Hill :
> >
> >> On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 07:38:00PM -0700, Joseph wrote:
> >> > I just upgraded to Firefox-24.1.1 and when an online pdf file is
> >> >
On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 09:06:38AM -0700, Joseph wrote:
>
> Thank you for the hints, here is the output of: tail -f /var/log/messages
> My line if fstab is:
> /dev/sdb1 /media/stickautonoauto,rw,user
> and this USB below file are mounted as root:root (not joseph:users)
On 12/31/13 18:47, waben...@gmail.com wrote:
Am Montag, 30.12.2013 um 22:03
schrieb Bruce Hill :
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 07:38:00PM -0700, Joseph wrote:
> I just upgraded to Firefox-24.1.1 and when an online pdf file is
> generated some ugly view pops up that is using "monospace fonts"
> imposs
Am Montag, 30.12.2013 um 22:03
schrieb Bruce Hill :
> On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 07:38:00PM -0700, Joseph wrote:
> > I just upgraded to Firefox-24.1.1 and when an online pdf file is
> > generated some ugly view pops up that is using "monospace fonts"
> > impossible to read and it looks ugly on a prin
Am Dienstag, 31.12.2013 um 10:31
schrieb Alan McKinnon :
> On 31/12/2013 04:30, waben...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Am Dienstag, 31.12.2013 um 01:38
> > schrieb Neil Bothwick :
> >
> >> On Mon, 30 Dec 2013 17:52:56 +0100, waben...@gmail.com wrote:
> >>
> For some reason or another the system doesn
On 2013-12-31 11:10 AM, Tanstaafl wrote:
(dev-lang/perl-5.14.2::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) pulled in by
=dev-lang/perl-5.14* required by
(virtual/perl-digest-base-1.160.0-r1::gentoo, installed)
(and 1 more with the same problem)
Weird...
Messed around, downgraded perl to
On 31/12/2013 18:06, Joseph wrote:
> On 12/31/13 10:49, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>> On 30/12/2013 19:22, Joseph wrote:
>>> On 12/30/13 17:36, Randolph Maaßen wrote:
>>> [snip]
>
> With the line in fstab:
>
> /dev/sdb1 /media/stickauto
> noauto,rw,users
>
A remote system I manage has a problem with perl.
Hasn't been updated in a while. I'm finding references to similar
problems, but can't figure this out.
I was updating portage, which wanted to update perl to 5.16.3, and now
perl seems to be broken.
perl-cleaner -p --reallyall produces:
!!!
On Tue, 31 Dec 2013 02:46:45 -0500
Mansour Al Akeel wrote:
> I haven't updated my portage tree for a while.
> I tried to update recently but got some conflicts. So I removed some
> packages manually.
> This didnt' solve the issue. So I decided to remove all the masked
> packages that I unmasked.
On 12/31/13 10:49, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On 30/12/2013 19:22, Joseph wrote:
On 12/30/13 17:36, Randolph Maaßen wrote:
[snip]
With the line in fstab:
/dev/sdb1 /media/stickautonoauto,rw,users
0 0
Some USB stick are mounted as root:root and I can not change that
e
On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 9:08 AM, Pandu Poluan wrote:
>
> On Dec 30, 2013 7:31 PM, "shawn wilson" wrote:
>>
>> Minor additions to what Pandu said...
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 7:02 AM, Pandu Poluan wrote:
>> > On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 6:07 PM, Tanstaafl
>> > wrote:
>>
>> > The numbers within [
On Dec 30, 2013 7:31 PM, "shawn wilson" wrote:
>
> Minor additions to what Pandu said...
>
> On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 7:02 AM, Pandu Poluan wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 6:07 PM, Tanstaafl
wrote:
>
> > The numbers within [brackets] are statistics/countes. Just replace
> > them with [0:0], un
On 2013-12-31 7:30 AM, Tanstaafl wrote:
I've made the following changes to the following config files:
/etc/conf.d/nfs
OPTS_RPC_MOUNTD="-p 32767"
OPTS_RPC_STATD="-p 32765 -o 32766"
I've also changed the lockd ports
/etc/sysctl.conf
# You should compile nfsd into the kernel or add it
# to mo
On 2013-12-30 3:25 PM, Tanstaafl wrote:
This is for NFS CLIENT... I'm mounting NFS shares from my remote QNAP
NAS boxes.
I've tried specifying the ports in /etc/conf.d/nfs, and /etc
sysctl.conf, but I must be missing something, because every time I
reboot, some other port comes up being blocke
On 2013-12-30 6:21 PM, Pavel Volkov wrote:
I've tried specifying the ports in /etc/conf.d/nfs, and /etc
>sysctl.conf, but I must be missing something, because every time I
>reboot, some other port comes up being blocked when I try to mount the
>shares...
>
>Anyone? The references I've found are
On 2013-12-31 5:57 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
These things happen, no use wondering about them, especially if they are
not reproducible. Instead:
/etc/init.d/apache2 start
apachectl graceful
apachectl reload
and check those commands do what they ought to.
Well, if the last two (it is apache2ct
On 2013-12-30 8:35 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Mon, 30 Dec 2013 08:44:45 -0500, Tanstaafl wrote:
Interesting. Wonder how I missed that, or why my new install doesn't
have it enabled - or is it enabled somewhere other than in
/etc/portage/make.conf?
It's enabled in the profile, like most defa
On 30/12/2013 15:44, Tanstaafl wrote:
>>> This happened by the way when the logs were rotated by logrotate. Maybe
>>> that is significant?
>>
>> Yes, that is highly significant.
>>
>> IIRC logrotate can work in one of two ways:
>>
>> 1. rename the log file and create a new empty one
>> 2. copy the
On Tuesday 31 December 2013 08:03:10 Hans de Graaff wrote:
> Because we haven't gotten around to that yet. Also note that only a few
> packages currently have ruby21 support, so eselecting it right now is not
> very useful yet.
>
> We should be updating the ruby eselect module in the next week or
On 30/12/2013 19:22, Joseph wrote:
> On 12/30/13 17:36, Randolph Maaßen wrote:
> [snip]
>>>
>>> With the line in fstab:
>>>
>>> /dev/sdb1 /media/stickautonoauto,rw,users
>>> 0 0
>>>
>>> Some USB stick are mounted as root:root and I can not change that
>>> even as
>>>
On 31/12/2013 04:30, waben...@gmail.com wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 31.12.2013 um 01:38
> schrieb Neil Bothwick :
>
>> On Mon, 30 Dec 2013 17:52:56 +0100, waben...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
For some reason or another the system doesn't like my fstab entry:
/dev/sdb1 /media/stickauto
>>>
On Mon, 30 Dec 2013 18:25:38 +0400, Pavel Volkov wrote:
> I currently set my RUBY_TARGETS in make.conf to:
> RUBY_TARGETS="ruby20 ruby21"
>
> World is updated.
>
> But ruby21 profile can't be selected with eselect:
> $ eselect ruby list Available Ruby profiles:
> [1] ruby20 (with Rubygems) *
25 matches
Mail list logo
