On , James wrote:
Howdy,
So I have these entries in my /etc/default/grub file:
GRUB_DISTRIBUTOR="Gentoo"
GRUB_DEFAULT=kernel-3.13.6-gentoo
I don't think this will work -- it is the title of menu entry you need
not the kernel executable
GRUB_HIDDEN_TIMEOUT=3
GRUB_TIMEOUT=10
GRUB_GFXMODE=10
On Wed, 26 Mar 2014 14:42:51 + (UTC), James wrote:
> > > So when I get the Grub2 (ascii) boot menu and just select the
> > > default, it boots kernel-3.13.7-gentoo, despite
> > > 'kernel-3.13.6-gentoo' being set in as the default for Grub2?
>
> > DEFAULT, if not set to a number, matches t
On Wednesday 26 Mar 2014 15:01:07 James wrote:
> wraeth privatdemail.net> writes:
> > That being said, I'm pretty sure the warning you're being presented with
> > is just a warning and is safe to ignore, given that you know you need to
> > be running a kernel that does not have DRM built-in.
>
>
wraeth privatdemail.net> writes:
> That being said, I'm pretty sure the warning you're being presented with is
> just a warning and is safe to ignore, given that you know you need to be
> running a kernel that does not have DRM built-in.
Ah, look what I verified:
glxinfo
name of display: :0
di
Neil Bothwick digimed.co.uk> writes:
> > GRUB_DISTRIBUTOR="Gentoo"
> > GRUB_DEFAULT=kernel-3.13.6-gentoo
> > GRUB_HIDDEN_TIMEOUT=3
> > GRUB_TIMEOUT=10
> > GRUB_GFXMODE=1024x768
> > /boot shows:
> > kernel-3.13.0-gentoo
> > kernel-3.13.0-gentoo-r1
> > kernel-3.13.1-gentoo
> > kernel-3.13.6-gento
Neil Bothwick digimed.co.uk> writes:
> > * Checking for suitable kernel configuration options...
> > (red) * CONFIG_DRM must be disabled or compiled as a module and not
> > (red) * loaded for direct rendering to work.
> > * Please check to make sure these options are set correctly.
> Doesn't
wraeth privatdemail.net> writes:
> That being said, I'm pretty sure the warning you're being presented with is
> just a warning and is safe to ignore, given that you know you need to be
> running a kernel that does not have DRM built-in.
Well this is good news too I suspected something like
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 4:49 PM, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote:
>
> The 25/03/14, J. Roeleveld wrote:
>
> > It has already been determined that on this list we do not want extra CCs,
>
> I think you have determined this on your side (I'm not doing a personal
> attack, "you" is not "you" alone).
>
What u
The 25/03/14, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> It has already been determined that on this list we do not want extra CCs,
I think you have determined this on your side (I'm not doing a personal
attack, "you" is not "you" alone).
> Please respect that and don't reopen this discussion.
Please don't tell us
9 matches
Mail list logo
