On 23/01/16 09:21, Michael Palimaka wrote:
On 01/23/2016 06:04 AM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
I have a weird problem. I have an ebuild where either qt4 or qt5 can be
enabled. They are both disabled by default and I have to choose which
one I want. The ebuild does that with:
IUSE="qt4 qt5"
R
On 22/01/16 21:45, Mick wrote:
On Friday 22 Jan 2016 21:04:48 Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
I have a weird problem. I have an ebuild where either qt4 or qt5 can be
enabled. They are both disabled by default and I have to choose which
one I want. The ebuild does that with:
IUSE="qt4 qt5"
REQU
On 01/23/2016 06:04 AM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> I have a weird problem. I have an ebuild where either qt4 or qt5 can be
> enabled. They are both disabled by default and I have to choose which
> one I want. The ebuild does that with:
>
> IUSE="qt4 qt5"
> REQUIRED_USE="^^ ( qt4 qt5 )"
>
> I'
lee wrote:
> Rich Freeman writes:
>
> > On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 5:22 PM, lee wrote:
> >> "J. Roeleveld" writes:
> >>
> >> How does that work? IIUC, when you created a snapshot, any changes you
> >> make to the snapshotted (or how that is called) file system are being
> >> referenced by the s
On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 1:34 PM, lukash wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm reading on the internet that systemctl poweroff should work for
> normal user if he is the only one logged in, he is logged in locally
> and his session is active. I seem to be meeting these conditions:
>
> # loginctl
>SESSION
Am Wed, 20 Jan 2016 01:46:29 +0100
schrieb lee :
> The time before, it wasn't
> a VM but a very slow machine, and that also took a week. You can have
> the fastest machine on the world and Windoze always manages to bring
> it down to a slowness we wouldn't have accepted even 20 years ago.
This i
Am Fri, 22 Jan 2016 00:52:30 +0100
schrieb lee :
> Is WSUS of any use without domains? If it is, I should take a look at
> it.
You can use it with and without domains. What domains give you through
GPO is just automatic deployment of the needed registry settings in the
client.
You can simply cr
On Fri, 22 Jan 2016 19:45:29 +, Mick wrote:
> > Can someone enlighten me?
>
> euse -I qt4
>
> should provide some pointers. It may be your desktop profile?
If so, it should show up in "emerge --info | grep qt4". I am using
default/linux/amd64/13.0/desktop/plasma/systemd and both qt4 and
On Fri, 22 Jan 2016 11:51:45 -0800, Grant wrote:
> > To talk to this computer from another of my machines over ZT I would
> > use the 10.252... address. If you tried that address, you'd get
> > nowhere as you are not connected to my network.
> So if 10.252.252.6 were configured as a router, cou
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 5:00 PM, lee wrote:
> Hm, I must be misunderstanding snapshots entirely.
>
Well, in the case of zfs/btrfs you are. Different implementations
have different snapshotting features.
> What happens when you remove a snapshot after you modified the
> "original" /and/ the snap
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 4:35 PM, lee wrote:
> And I thought vnc sends a copy of what is displayed on the screen, so if
> you were running a program that renders something on the screen and
> uses/requires a graphics card for that, you should be able to see what
> it renders. If you can't see that
"J. Roeleveld" writes:
> On Wednesday, January 20, 2016 01:46:29 AM lee wrote:
>> "J. Roeleveld" writes:
>> > On Tuesday, January 19, 2016 01:46:45 AM lee wrote:
>> >> "J. Roeleveld" writes:
>> >> > On Monday, January 18, 2016 02:02:27 AM lee wrote:
>> >> >> "J. Roeleveld" writes:
>
>> >> >
>
Alec Ten Harmsel writes:
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 10:56:21PM +0100, lee wrote:
>> Alec Ten Harmsel writes:
>> >
>> > Depends on how the load is. Right now I have a 500GB HDD at work. I use
>> > VirtualBox and vagrant for testing various software. Every VM in
>> > VirtualBox gets a 50GB hard dis
Rich Freeman writes:
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 5:22 PM, lee wrote:
>> "J. Roeleveld" writes:
>>
>> How does that work? IIUC, when you created a snapshot, any changes you
>> make to the snapshotted (or how that is called) file system are being
>> referenced by the snapshot which you can either
Rich Freeman writes:
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 5:08 PM, lee wrote:
>>
>> BTW, is it as easy to give a graphics card to a container as it is to
>> give it a network card?
>
> I've never tried it, but I'd think that the container could talk to a
> graphics card.
Maybe ... it's really easy with ne
"J. Roeleveld" writes:
> On Tuesday, January 19, 2016 11:22:02 PM lee wrote:
>> "J. Roeleveld" writes:
>> > [...]
>> > If disk-space is considered too expensive, you could even have every VM
>> > use
>> > the same base image. And have them store only the differences of the disk.
>> > eg:
>> > 1)
>> The answer to this may be an obvious "yes" but I've never done it so I'm
>> not sure. Can I route requests from machine C through machine A only
>> for my domain name, and not involve A for C's other internet requests?
>> If so, where is that configured?
>
> While ZT can be used to route reques
On Friday 22 Jan 2016 21:04:48 Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> I have a weird problem. I have an ebuild where either qt4 or qt5 can be
> enabled. They are both disabled by default and I have to choose which
> one I want. The ebuild does that with:
>
>IUSE="qt4 qt5"
>REQUIRED_USE="^^ ( qt4 qt5 )
I have a weird problem. I have an ebuild where either qt4 or qt5 can be
enabled. They are both disabled by default and I have to choose which
one I want. The ebuild does that with:
IUSE="qt4 qt5"
REQUIRED_USE="^^ ( qt4 qt5 )"
I'm on the plasma profile which enabled qt5 automatically. Howev
Neil Bothwick digimed.co.uk> writes:
> > The answer to this may be an obvious "yes" but I've never done it so I'm
> > not sure. Can I route requests from machine C through machine A only
> > for my domain name, and not involve A for C's other internet requests?
> > If so, where is that configur
Well this one is new to me. Googling reveals the spike linux distro
is a version of Sabayon, which is based on gentoo.
So 'eix -R cassandra' ::
dev-db/cassandra [5]
Available versions: 0.6.1 ~0.7.0-r2 ~2.0.7 ~2.0.10 ~2.1.3 ~2.12 {doc
ELIBC="FreeBSD"}
Homepage:http://cassan
On Fri, 22 Jan 2016 04:29:00 -0800, Grant wrote:
> The answer to this may be an obvious "yes" but I've never done it so I'm
> not sure. Can I route requests from machine C through machine A only
> for my domain name, and not involve A for C's other internet requests?
> If so, where is that config
On Fri, 22 Jan 2016 07:52:12 -0500, Rich Freeman wrote:
> My understanding is that ZT does not support routing of any kind.
> Traffic destined to a ZT peer goes directly to that peer, and that's
> it. You can't route over ZT and onto a subnet on a remote peer's
> network, or from one peer to anot
On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 7:29 AM, Grant wrote:
>
> The answer to this may be an obvious "yes" but I've never done it so I'm not
> sure. Can I route requests from machine C through machine A only for my
> domain name, and not involve A for C's other internet requests? If so,
> where is that config
>
> > Zerotier looks especially interesting. Can I have machine A listen for
> > Zerotier connections, have machine B connect to machine A via Zerotier,
> > have machine C connect to machine A via Zerotier, and rsync push from B
> > to C?
>
> You set up a network and the machines all connect to th
On Thu, 21 Jan 2016 17:18:27 -0800, Grant wrote:
> > There is ZeroTier as a replacement for OpenVPN, and Syncthing for
> > syncing. Both are P2P solutions and you can run your own discovery
> > servers if you don't want any traffic going through a 3rd party
> > (although they don't send data throu
26 matches
Mail list logo
