Re: [gentoo-user] NeoMutt and GnuPG

2018-01-31 Thread Lucas Ramage
Oh excellent! I will drop those in my dotfiles. I am going to try and write some of this down in the Gentoo Wiki since there isn't really that much on the existing page. https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Mutt There isn't even a page for NeoMutt.

[gentoo-user] Re: Connman refuses to work

2018-01-31 Thread Melleus
Alan McKinnon writes: > On 07/01/2018 17:45, Melleus wrote: >> Melleus writes: >> >>> Neil Bothwick writes: >>> On Sat, 06 Jan 2018 18:46:25 +0200, Melleus wrote: >> What do the logs say? > That's all I could find in syslog: > > connmand[6709]: Aborting (signal 11)

Re: [gentoo-user] NeoMutt and GnuPG

2018-01-31 Thread Floyd Anderson
On Wed, 31 Jan 2018 12:18:08 -0500 Lucas Ramage wrote: Hello again, I feel really stupid. So I had set imap_user/pass, but not smtp_url so I was receiving emails fine, but then instead of sending them, it was just encrypting them and saving them via `set record = "+[Gmail]/Sent Mail"`. ** fac

Re: [gentoo-user] chromium build failure

2018-01-31 Thread allan gottlieb
On Wed, Jan 31 2018, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote: > On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 1:29 PM, allan gottlieb wrote: > [snip] >> I have two questions, one trivial, one hopefully easy. >> >> 1. (trivial) In your recipe did you mean "rsync", not "sync"? > > I sync ("emerge --sync") only one machine, and then I

Re: [gentoo-user] chromium build failure

2018-01-31 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Wed, 31 Jan 2018 15:38:27 -0600, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote: > I sync ("emerge --sync") only one machine, and then I rsync from there > to my other computers. After the rsync is done, you need to do "emerge > --metadata" in the recipient machine (--sync does that for you > automatically). If yo

Re: [gentoo-user] chromium build failure

2018-01-31 Thread Canek Peláez Valdés
On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 1:29 PM, allan gottlieb wrote: [snip] > I have two questions, one trivial, one hopefully easy. > > 1. (trivial) In your recipe did you mean "rsync", not "sync"? I sync ("emerge --sync") only one machine, and then I rsync from there to my other computers. After the rsync is

[gentoo-user] Grub2 boot problem

2018-01-31 Thread Magnus Johansson
Hello. I've got a fresh Gentoo installation that does not boot. I just end up in the Grub2 shell. However when there if I do 'set root=(md/0)' and 'configfile /grub/grub.cfg' I do get to the Grub2 menu where Gentoo boots just fine. /boot and / are both on mdadm devices. I've tried re-running gr

Re: [gentoo-user] chromium build failure

2018-01-31 Thread allan gottlieb
On Wed, Jan 24 2018, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote: > On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 10:11 PM, allan gottlieb wrote: >> >> I ran the build failed twice, each time with MAKEOPTS="--jobs=1" and the >> build logs are essentially identical. After about 12 hours compiling and >> 36MB of build.log, the error sho

Re: [gentoo-user] NeoMutt and GnuPG

2018-01-31 Thread Lucas Ramage
Hello again, I feel really stupid. So I had set imap_user/pass, but not smtp_url so I was receiving emails fine, but then instead of sending them, it was just encrypting them and saving them via `set record = "+[Gmail]/Sent Mail"`. ** face palm ** Thanks for your help!

Re: [gentoo-user] New install .. no high res console during boot.

2018-01-31 Thread Corbin Bird
On 01/31/2018 07:38 AM, Harry Putnam wrote: > Setup: > Installing gentoo-17 as guest in Vbox vm on solaris-11 HOST >(openindiana (powered by Illumos)) > > VBox 5.6.2 > Kernel-4.15.0 > grub2 > > I'm a litte confused about how to enable a high res framebuffer > console. >

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: gcc 7.3 + kernel 4.15 = spectre_v2 fixed

2018-01-31 Thread Rich Freeman
On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 7:07 AM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > > I was under the impression that it's the function that performs the call > that needs protection. The called function doesn't need protection, because > if it ends up being actually called, then it's too late already. > > For example, i

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: gcc 7.3 + kernel 4.15 = spectre_v2 fixed

2018-01-31 Thread Rich Freeman
On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 4:16 AM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > On 30/01/18 23:43, Rich Freeman wrote: >> >> If you had some program that listened on a socket and accepted a >> length and a string and then did a bounds check using the length, it >> might be exploitable if a local process could feed it

[gentoo-user] New install .. no high res console during boot.

2018-01-31 Thread Harry Putnam
Setup: Installing gentoo-17 as guest in Vbox vm on solaris-11 HOST (openindiana (powered by Illumos)) VBox 5.6.2 Kernel-4.15.0 grub2 I'm a litte confused about how to enable a high res framebuffer console. At gentoo pages: https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Xorg/Guide#Kerne

Re: [gentoo-user] UEFI-fails to boot

2018-01-31 Thread J. Roeleveld
On Sunday, January 28, 2018 11:35:33 AM CET Dan Johansson wrote: > On 28.01.2018 00:13, Corbin Bird wrote: > > Thanks for your feedback. > > > . > > Thank you for that info. > > . > > What kind of integrated VGA? > > ( example Intel i915, i965, etc. ) > > According to the MB docu is it a "ASPEED

[gentoo-user] Re: gcc 7.3 + kernel 4.15 = spectre_v2 fixed

2018-01-31 Thread Martin Vaeth
Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > > For example, if you don't trust Firefox, don't install Firefox. But you > *do* trust Firefox. What you don't trust is the JS code Firefox is > executing. That's an artificial distinction, because it is actually firefox which is executing the code during the interpreta

[gentoo-user] kernel choices for booting gentoo as guest in vbox vm

2018-01-31 Thread Harry Putnam
Installing gentoo as guest into vbox vm on solaris-11 (openindiana) HOST gentoo-17 VBox 5.2.6 Kernel 4.15.0 My first boot resulted in resulted in a kernel panic... not able to mount root. I checked my /etc/fstab trying to make sure I didn't make a stupid mistake there... it appear to be sound. (I

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: gcc 7.3 + kernel 4.15 = spectre_v2 fixed

2018-01-31 Thread Mick
On Wednesday, 31 January 2018 12:20:51 GMT Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > On 31/01/18 14:04, Mick wrote: > > Just to dilute my confusion on what I should do to keep desktops safe(r), > > would someone please clarify: > > > > Is it necessary to keyword gcc 7.3 + kernel 4.15 and emerge kernel 4.15 > > w

[gentoo-user] Re: gcc 7.3 + kernel 4.15 = spectre_v2 fixed

2018-01-31 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 31/01/18 14:04, Mick wrote: Just to dilute my confusion on what I should do to keep desktops safe(r), would someone please clarify: Is it necessary to keyword gcc 7.3 + kernel 4.15 and emerge kernel 4.15 with gcc 7.3, or wait until these versions have been stabilised in the tree? What gcc ve

[gentoo-user] Re: gcc 7.3 + kernel 4.15 = spectre_v2 fixed

2018-01-31 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 31/01/18 13:17, Martin Vaeth wrote: Nikos Chantziaras wrote: Well, if you're running a local process that is trying to attack you, you've been compromised already, imo. By your definition, you are compromised if you surf to the wrong webpage with enabled javascript. That's not what was

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: gcc 7.3 + kernel 4.15 = spectre_v2 fixed

2018-01-31 Thread Mick
On Wednesday, 31 January 2018 11:30:13 GMT Martin Vaeth wrote: > Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > > Yeah, that's the kind of software that benefits from the Spectre > > mitigation patches. Like browsers, virtualization or emulation software, > > the kernel, etc. > > No. It's software like gnupg, encfs,

[gentoo-user] Re: gcc 7.3 + kernel 4.15 = spectre_v2 fixed

2018-01-31 Thread Martin Vaeth
Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > Yeah, that's the kind of software that benefits from the Spectre > mitigation patches. Like browsers, virtualization or emulation software, > the kernel, etc. No. It's software like gnupg, encfs, openssl and all the library they use (glibc, glib, X etc) which need these

[gentoo-user] Re: gcc 7.3 + kernel 4.15 = spectre_v2 fixed

2018-01-31 Thread Martin Vaeth
Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > > Well, if you're running a local process that is trying to attack you, > you've been compromised already, imo. By your definition, you are compromised if you surf to the wrong webpage with enabled javascript. While this is arguably true, I would distinguish between va

[gentoo-user] Re: gcc 7.3 + kernel 4.15 = spectre_v2 fixed

2018-01-31 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 31/01/18 11:48, taii...@gmx.com wrote: On 01/31/2018 04:16 AM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: On 30/01/18 23:43, Rich Freeman wrote: If you had some program that listened on a socket and accepted a length and a string and then did a bounds check using the length, it might be exploitable if a loca

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: gcc 7.3 + kernel 4.15 = spectre_v2 fixed

2018-01-31 Thread taii...@gmx.com
On 01/31/2018 04:16 AM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: On 30/01/18 23:43, Rich Freeman wrote: If you had some program that listened on a socket and accepted a length and a string and then did a bounds check using the length, it might be exploitable if a local process could feed it data. Even if the p

Re: [gentoo-user] NeoMutt and GnuPG

2018-01-31 Thread Floyd Anderson
On Wed, 31 Jan 2018 20:50:13 +1300 "Roger J. H. Welsh" wrote: On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 05:17:45AM +0100 , Floyd Anderson wrote: > On my neomutt, when I press "v" to view attachments, all I can > see is text/plain. I think my neomutt does something automatic to > decrypt the messages. > Indeed

[gentoo-user] Re: gcc 7.3 + kernel 4.15 = spectre_v2 fixed

2018-01-31 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 30/01/18 23:43, Rich Freeman wrote: If you had some program that listened on a socket and accepted a length and a string and then did a bounds check using the length, it might be exploitable if a local process could feed it data. Even if the process only listened for outside connections it mi