Re: [gentoo-user] nvidia-drivers-396.24-r1

2018-07-08 Thread Davyd McColl
I have exactly the same kernel (4.14.52-gentoo) and nvidia-drivers (396.24-r1) and I don't experience this issue (though games requiring Vulkan crash out sporadically - there's an ongoing issue on the nvidia forums for this, where apparently it's already been fixed in some ancient fork, and

Re: [gentoo-user] nvidia-drivers-396.24-r1

2018-07-08 Thread Jack
On 2018.07.08 18:46, Philip Webb wrote: 180610 Philip Webb wrote: > I updated to the latest stable Nvidia-drivers-396.24-r1 , > rebooted & 'startx' : > the result was an X error "No devices detected ... no screens found". > Downgrading to 390.48 got X working again. > Nothing to see on the

Re: [gentoo-user] nvidia-drivers-396.24-r1

2018-07-08 Thread Philip Webb
180610 Philip Webb wrote: > I updated to the latest stable Nvidia-drivers-396.24-r1 , > rebooted & 'startx' : > the result was an X error "No devices detected ... no screens found". > Downgrading to 390.48 got X working again. > Nothing to see on the Forum or among Gentoo 'nvidia' bugs. > My

Re: [gentoo-user] how best to encrypt a file

2018-07-08 Thread Philip Webb
180703 Alec Ten Harmsel wrote: > On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 05:47:22AM -0400, Philip Webb wrote: >> I have a couple of small files which need to be encrypted : >> one is simple text ( .txt ), the other a spreadsheet ( .ods ). >> I haven't used encryption like this before : what do others use ? > I

[gentoo-user] Re: Re[4]: Re: Portage, git and shallow cloning

2018-07-08 Thread Martin Vaeth
Rich Freeman wrote: > emerge --sync works just fine if > there are uncommitted changes in your repository, whether they are > indexed or otherwise. You are right. It seems to be somewhat "random" when git pull refuses to work and when not. I could not detect a common scheme. Maybe this has

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re[4]: Re: Portage, git and shallow cloning

2018-07-08 Thread Rich Freeman
On Sun, Jul 8, 2018 at 4:28 AM Martin Vaeth wrote: > > Rich Freeman wrote: > > It's the *history* of the metadata which matters here: You make a reasonable point here. > > "The council does not require that ChangeLogs be generated or > > distributed through the rsync system. It is at the

[gentoo-user] Re: Re[4]: Re: Portage, git and shallow cloning

2018-07-08 Thread Martin Vaeth
Rich Freeman wrote: >> I was speaking about gentoo's git repository, of course >> (the one which was attacked on github), not about a Frankensteined one >> with metadata history filling megabytes of disk space unnecessarily. >> Who has that much disk space to waste? > > Doesn't portage create