Ok, it's about 2:45 AM, I thoughtlessly did something absurdly risky,
resize a chromium browser pane by clicking on the edge of the window and
dragging it a few pixels, so naturally X11 goes down taking my number
theory code with it. Reminder: I had run that code from May 1 through
last week and on
Jack wrote:
> On 10/31/19 12:26 PM, Dale wrote:
> [snip...]
>> I disabled that on mine. I do my spam filtering locally on my machine.
>
> How did you disable spam filtering on gmail? I would love to do it,
> but have not found a setting for such.
>
> Jack
>
>
>
I googled for it ages ago and so
On 31 October 2019 16:52:36 CET, Dale wrote:
>Howdy,
>
>I been getting quite a few of these lately.
>
>
>> Some messages to you could not be delivered. If you're seeing this
>> message it means things are back to normal, and it's merely for your
>> information.
>>
>> Here is the list of the bounc
On 2019-10-31, Mick wrote:
> On Thursday, 31 October 2019 16:06:15 GMT Dale wrote:
>> Mick wrote:
>
>> > I'm getting the same. On the same message(s). On user@ only.
>>
>> I sent for and got the help thingy and tried to get it to send me the
>> missed messages. So far, I've yet to get anything
On Thu, 31 Oct 2019 11:29:15 -0400, Alan Grimes wrote:
> Oh for the love of god:
>
>
> * Messages for package www-client/chromium-78.0.3904.70:
>
> * ERROR: www-client/chromium-78.0.3904.70::gentoo failed (compile
> phase):
> * ninja -v -j16 -l0 -C out/Release v8_context_snapshot_generator
On 10/31/19 12:26 PM, Dale wrote:
[snip...]
I disabled that on mine. I do my spam filtering locally on my machine.
How did you disable spam filtering on gmail? I would love to do it, but
have not found a setting for such.
Jack
Mick wrote:
> On Thursday, 31 October 2019 16:26:32 GMT Dale wrote:
>> Michael Orlitzky wrote:
>>> On 10/31/19 12:01 PM, Mick wrote:
I'm getting the same. On the same message(s). On user@ only.
>>> Since you're both on gmail, those messages were probably rejected as
>>> spam. It just happens
Mick wrote:
> On Thursday, 31 October 2019 16:06:15 GMT Dale wrote:
>> Mick wrote:
>>> I'm getting the same. On the same message(s). On user@ only.
>> I sent for and got the help thingy and tried to get it to send me the
>> missed messages. So far, I've yet to get anything including a error
>> t
On Thursday, 31 October 2019 16:26:32 GMT Dale wrote:
> Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> > On 10/31/19 12:01 PM, Mick wrote:
> >> I'm getting the same. On the same message(s). On user@ only.
> >
> > Since you're both on gmail, those messages were probably rejected as
> > spam. It just happens sometimes
Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 10/31/19 12:01 PM, Mick wrote:
>>
>> I'm getting the same. On the same message(s). On user@ only.
>>
>
> Since you're both on gmail, those messages were probably rejected as
> spam. It just happens sometimes.
>
> .
>
I disabled that on mine. I do my spam filtering
On Thursday, 31 October 2019 16:06:15 GMT Dale wrote:
> Mick wrote:
> > I'm getting the same. On the same message(s). On user@ only.
>
> I sent for and got the help thingy and tried to get it to send me the
> missed messages. So far, I've yet to get anything including a error
> that I did it w
Mick wrote:
> On Thursday, 31 October 2019 15:52:36 GMT Dale wrote:
>> Howdy,
>>
>> I been getting quite a few of these lately.
>>
>>> Some messages to you could not be delivered. If you're seeing this
>>> message it means things are back to normal, and it's merely for your
>>> information.
>>>
>>
Same. My guess is that it's Gmail filters doesn't accept some of the
messages from the mailing list
On Thu, Oct 31, 2019, 20:02 Mick wrote:
> On Thursday, 31 October 2019 15:52:36 GMT Dale wrote:
> > Howdy,
> >
> > I been getting quite a few of these lately.
> >
> > > Some messages to you could
On 10/31/19 12:01 PM, Mick wrote:
I'm getting the same. On the same message(s). On user@ only.
Since you're both on gmail, those messages were probably rejected as
spam. It just happens sometimes.
On Thursday, 31 October 2019 15:52:36 GMT Dale wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> I been getting quite a few of these lately.
>
> > Some messages to you could not be delivered. If you're seeing this
> > message it means things are back to normal, and it's merely for your
> > information.
> >
> > Here is the l
Mick wrote:
> On Monday, 28 October 2019 08:25:06 GMT Neil Bothwick wrote:
>> On Mon, 28 Oct 2019 02:46:45 -0500, Dale wrote:
>>> Thanks much for the info. Maybe the switch will go well for me too.
>> If it works for you it will be good news for the rest of us ;-)
> If hald's list of devices has
Howdy,
I been getting quite a few of these lately.
> Some messages to you could not be delivered. If you're seeing this
> message it means things are back to normal, and it's merely for your
> information.
>
> Here is the list of the bounced messages:
> - 188380
I get these related to -user a
Oh for the love of god:
* Messages for package www-client/chromium-78.0.3904.70:
* ERROR: www-client/chromium-78.0.3904.70::gentoo failed (compile phase):
* ninja -v -j16 -l0 -C out/Release v8_context_snapshot_generator failed
*
* Call stack:
* ebuild.sh, line 125: Called src_compi
You need to pay more attention to details. Only virtual/pam has been masked
# required by virtual/pam (argument)
# /usr/portage/profiles/package.mask:
# Mikle Kolyada (2019-10-16)
# not needed due to openpam removal. Please
# update your packages running emerge with the
# --changed-deps option
Emperor penguin, brooding as usual: "I'm bored, how can we fuck with the
users this week?"
Chancelor penguin: "we can mask PAM for no reason. It has never caused
anyone any problem but removing it will drive the users crazy for days
trying to get their system working when they do emergency update
20 matches
Mail list logo
