On Wednesday, 18 December 2019 07:33:51 GMT Andrew Udvare wrote:
> > On Dec 17, 2019, at 20:51, Philip Webb wrote:
> >
> > When encrypting a file, I was told :
> > root:552 root> gpg -c
> > gpg: WARNING: unsafe ownership on homedir '/home/purslow/.gnupg'
> >
> > The file is owned by my user,
On Sun, Dec 15, 2019 at 07:01:15PM +0100, Thomas Schweikle wrote:
> The current version of portage supports EAPI '6'. You must upgrade to a
> newer version of portage before EAPI masked packages can be installed.
The message is pretty clear. You need to upgrade portage first. Try
`emerge -1 portag
Seems to be gone from:
https://github.com/gentoo-mirror/abendbrot
https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/repos/
Anyone knows what happened to it? And any way to learn about this in
advance? Doesn't look like repositories.xml is version controlled, couldn't
find anything in the mailing lists, either.
On 18.12.19 11:19, Ilya Trukhanov wrote:
> Seems to be gone from:
> https://github.com/gentoo-mirror/abendbrot
> https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/repos/
>
> Anyone knows what happened to it? And any way to learn about this in
> advance? Doesn't look like repositories.xml is version controlled,
On 2019-12-18, Ilya Trukhanov wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 15, 2019 at 07:01:15PM +0100, Thomas Schweikle wrote:
>> The current version of portage supports EAPI '6'. You must upgrade to a
>> newer version of portage before EAPI masked packages can be installed.
>
> The message is pretty clear. You need to
On 2019-12-17, Dr Rainer Woitok wrote:
> Can someone please guide me to rig up my box so it again mounts plugged
> in USB sticks automatically to "/run/media/.../"?
I do it by manually writing udev rules that watch for specific devices
and mount them at particular paths. On most systems, it wa
On 2019-12-18, (Nuno Silva)
wrote:
> The EAPI problem is in a package that is pulled as a dependency of
> portage.
>
> Unless there's a simple hack to solve this, you will need to use older
> ebuilds or split the update in several steps, using older versions of
> the portage tree. The following
Neil,
On Tuesday, 2019-12-17 21:35:11 +, you wrote:
> ...
> This is normally handled by the desktop environment, which desktop are
> you using?
Xfce.
Sincerely,
Rainer
Mick,
On Tuesday, 2019-12-17 23:44:19 +, you wrote:
> ...
> And ... usually by the sys-fs/udisks package, which performs the
> automounting.
> If for some reason you have uninstalled udisks,
$ equery --no-color list -F '$mask2,$location $fullversion:$slot $cp'
sys-fs/udisks
* Sear
Grant,
On Wednesday, 2019-12-18 15:57:41 -, you wrote:
> ...
> I do it by manually writing udev rules that watch for specific devices
> and mount them at particular paths.
It used to work out of the box without writing udev rules.
> handled by the "desktop" enviroment — which you don't ment
Greetings,
after today's 'emerge -pv -uDN @world' I was surprised by
---
Total: 189 packages (90 upgrades, 5 in new slots, 94 reinstalls), Size of
downloads: 822.841 KiB
WARNING: One or more updates/rebuilds have been skipped due to a dependency
conflict:
dev-libs/icu:0
(dev-li
191218 Mick wrote:
> On Wednesday, 18 December 2019 07:33:51 GMT Andrew Udvare wrote:
>> On Dec 17, 2019, at 20:51, Philip Webb wrote:
>>> When encrypting a file, I was told :
>>> root:552 root> gpg -c
>>> gpg: WARNING: unsafe ownership on homedir '/home/purslow/.gnupg'
>>> The file is owned
Hartmut Figge:
>At the moment the emerge runs through and is at (107 of 188). Will take
>some time before that is finished.
Stopped with an error
>>> Emerging (148 of 188) dev-cpp/glibmm-2.60.1::gentoo
>>> Failed to emerge dev-cpp/glibmm-2.60.1, Log file:
>>> '/var/tmp/portage/dev-cpp/glibmm-2.
On Wednesday, 18 December 2019 16:46:49 GMT Dr Rainer Woitok wrote:
> Mick,
>
> On Tuesday, 2019-12-17 23:44:19 +, you wrote:
> > ...
> > And ... usually by the sys-fs/udisks package, which performs the
> > automounting. If for some reason you have uninstalled udisks,
>
>$ equery --no-col
On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 11:03 AM Grant Edwards
wrote:
>
> On 2019-12-18, (Nuno Silva)
> wrote:
>
> > The EAPI problem is in a package that is pulled as a dependency of
> > portage.
> >
> > Unless there's a simple hack to solve this, you will need to use older
> > ebuilds or split the update in
Hi,
the subject explained it nearly complete:
What is the mechanism and how does it work, which
cares, that a certain package of a certain version
gets installed only once?
Thanks for any help in advance!
Cheers!
mcc
On Wed, 18 Dec 2019 19:24:03 +0100, tu...@posteo.de wrote:
> What is the mechanism and how does it work, which
> cares, that a certain package of a certain version
> gets installed only once?
The package database is at /var/db/pkg
--
Neil Bothwick
Good fortune will find you provided you left
On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 1:55 PM Neil Bothwick wrote:
>
> On Wed, 18 Dec 2019 19:24:03 +0100, tu...@posteo.de wrote:
>
> > What is the mechanism and how does it work, which
> > cares, that a certain package of a certain version
> > gets installed only once?
>
> The package database is at /var/db/pk
Hartmut Figge:
>So, a missing file. Attempting to emerge without glibmm.
Until the next stop. This time gst-plugins-base-1.14.5-r1 which required
gudev/gudev.h in /usr/include/gudev-1.0. That doesn't exist anymore and
seems to have been part of udev in the past.
Interesting day. :) llvw took ove
I have this line in /etc/conf.d/net:
config_wlp3s0="dhcp"
given:
$ifconfig wlp3s0
wlp3s0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx
inet addr:192.168.178.42 Bcast:192.168.178.255
Mask:255.255.255.0
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets
20 matches
Mail list logo
