Hi Rich, I will experiment with a local metadata - that seems like it
might give a worthwhile speedup (its currently about 910Mb so not too big)
Bill K.
On 28/2/20 3:44 am, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 2:27 PM james wrote:
>> On 2/26/20 7:08 PM, William Kenworthy wrote:
>>>
On 27/2/20 3:51 pm, Robert Bridge wrote:
>> On 27 Feb 2020, at 00:08, William Kenworthy wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> due to space considerations on my laptop I have moved portage onto a
>> network share (moosfs, mfsmounted) - slower but works fine. However,
>> being a laptop trying to
On 2/27/20 9:53 PM, Dale wrote:
james wrote:
5G + gentoo + embedded toys, is going to be FUN FUN FUN.
Then I'll be off to other states, via a hacked out Redneck
camper.. and too many microProcessors
Thanks Rich, your insights and comments are always most welcome.
James
Off
james wrote:
>
>
> 5G + gentoo + embedded toys, is going to be FUN FUN FUN.
>
>
> Then I'll be off to other states, via a hacked out Redneck
> camper.. and too many microProcessors
>
>
> Thanks Rich, your insights and comments are always most welcome.
>
>
> James
Off topic a bit but a
On 2/27/20 4:49 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 4:25 PM james wrote:
Yea, I was not clear. I'd run the mail-server, on a 'cluster' (4 or
more), not an individual pi-board unless it was beef up, processor and
ram wise. Gig E would also be on my list.
Unless you have some
On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 4:25 PM james wrote:
>
> Yea, I was not clear. I'd run the mail-server, on a 'cluster' (4 or
> more), not an individual pi-board unless it was beef up, processor and
> ram wise. Gig E would also be on my list.
>
Unless you have some niche need I wouldn't generally run
On 2/27/20 2:51 PM, Ralph Seichter wrote:
* ai...@aisha.cc:
I'm not too sure that running it as a mail server is impossible.
I never wrote that it is impossible, only that "I would not use it as an
Internet-facing production Mailserver". That's a huge difference. You
are free to do as you
* ai...@aisha.cc:
> I'm not too sure that running it as a mail server is impossible.
I never wrote that it is impossible, only that "I would not use it as an
Internet-facing production Mailserver". That's a huge difference. You
are free to do as you wish, but I still consider it an unsuitable
On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 2:27 PM james wrote:
>
> On 2/26/20 7:08 PM, William Kenworthy wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > ��� due to space considerations on my laptop I have moved portage
> > onto a
> > network share (moosfs, mfsmounted) - slower but works fine.� However,
> > being a laptop trying
On 2/26/20 7:08 PM, William Kenworthy wrote:
Hi,
��� due to space considerations on my laptop I have moved portage onto a
network share (moosfs, mfsmounted) - slower but works fine.� However,
being a laptop trying to update/install when out and about is both very
slow and network
I'm not too sure that running it as a mail server is impossible.
Depending on your expected traffic level, it should be more than capable
enough to do it.
My current server is only a 1 core + 1 GB VPS, which is much more lax
than a pi-4.
Depending on what guides you follow you can definitely
On 02/27 08:34, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Feb 2020 05:12:59 +0100, tu...@posteo.de wrote:
>
> > this command:
> > emerge --selective=n @preserved-rebuild
> >
> > gives me this message when started:
> > --- Invalid atom in /etc/portage/package.use/mkvtoolnix: qt5
>
> That's not an atom,
* james:
> I'm thinking about setting up a pair of Rasp-Pi-4 as DNS servers with
> 4GB of ram. Is that enough ram for a DNS server?
For running the Nameservers, yes. Compiling Gentoo packages will likely
put your SD-Card under stress, but that's just how it goes. My Model B
Rev 2 of 2015 runs
On Thu, 27 Feb 2020 05:12:59 +0100, tu...@posteo.de wrote:
> this command:
> emerge --selective=n @preserved-rebuild
>
> gives me this message when started:
> --- Invalid atom in /etc/portage/package.use/mkvtoolnix: qt5
That's not an atom, it's a USE flag. The format of package.use is
atom
14 matches
Mail list logo
