On 07/07/2010 10:37 AM, Jarry wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to see in console current network transfer rate
> for given interface, similar as I can see cpu-loading in [%]
> with "top" command.
>
> Just single overall value in [bytes/second] or similar unit
> would be enough for me, averaged over
On 07/01/2010 06:35 PM, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> * Call stack:
> * ebuild.sh, line 54: Called src_compile
> * environment, line 5365: Called python_src_compile
> * environment, line 5150: Called python_execute_function '-d' '-s' '--'
> * environment, line 4058: Called die
>
On 07/01/2010 08:59 AM, SpaceCake wrote:
> that's good if I want to mount at a specific location, but for swap I
> need the device name, but this is changes depending on how many other
> usb drives are connected. Looks lik this is a tricky question :)
No, you don't *NEED* the device name to mount
On 07/01/2010 08:44 AM, SpaceCake wrote:
> So, it solves the first problem, identifiying the device, but how can I
> tell to udev to use always /dev/sds (for example) for this device? Also
> I'm thinking how can I instruct udev to turn off swap when the device is
> removed, but this is another stor
On 06/30/2010 02:17 PM, Mick wrote:
> On Tuesday 29 June 2010 22:56:56 Alan McKinnon wrote:
>> Seems like the horrendous screw-up that was the libpng-1.4 update never got
>> fixed properly and is hitting stable users now.
>>
>> Flameeyes, in his usual in-your-face style, has documented what needs t
On 06/30/2010 10:57 AM, Florian Philipp wrote:
>> What do you mean here, Florian? The Atom can do either 32 or 64 bits. I
>> don't understand what you mean by "partly i686".
>>
>
> Quick lookup on Wikipedia for Intel64 instruction set support:
>
> Atom Z6xx "Lincroft" aka "Moorestown": no support
On 06/30/2010 09:44 AM, Florian Philipp wrote:
> You forget about Intel Atoms which are still partly i686 flavored. Of
> course, this point is mostly mood because these systems don't usually
> come with an optical drive.
What do you mean here, Florian? The Atom can do either 32 or 64 bits. I
don't
On 06/30/2010 09:20 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 09:17:00 -0700, Bill Longman wrote:
>
>> I agree with Grant and others. XFCE is the other WM on my machines. On
>> my old PIII with 256MB RAM, it's really the only option. KDE for the
>> ones with t
On 06/30/2010 08:03 AM, Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2010-06-30, Shoka wrote:
>
>> I'm trying to build kind of a minimal gentoo setup with X support. All I
>> need is
>>
>> - X11 and a Window Manager
>> - Mozilla Firefox
>> - Lighttpd
>>
>> I use Gnome at this time.
>
> Gnome?!?!
>
> That's like s
On 06/29/2010 06:08 PM, Hasan SAHIN wrote:
> I have read the safe flags document and it says that :
>
> /GCC 4.2 introduces a new -march option, -march=*native*, which
> automatically detects the features your CPU supports and sets the
> options appropriately. If you have an Intel or AMD CPU and a
On 06/29/2010 05:54 PM, Hasan SAHIN wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I am using Athlon64 X2 processor with the
> CFLAGS="-march=k8 -O2 -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer" option.
>
> Can I use the -march=native option instead of that?
Sorry, Hasan, I dropped my "3"s.
-msse3 and -march=k8-sse3
On 06/29/2010 05:54 PM, Hasan SAHIN wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I am using Athlon64 X2 processor with the
> CFLAGS="-march=k8 -O2 -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer" option.
>
> Can I use the -march=native option instead of that?
>
> P.S. : I am using x86 stable box.
Depends more on the version of gcc you'
On 06/25/2010 12:17 PM, rocwhite168 wrote:
> "Root-NFS: No NFS server available, giving up.
> VFS: Unable to mount root fs via NFS, trying floppy.
> VFS: Cannot open root device "sda5" or unknown-block(2,0)
> Please append ac correct "root=" boot option; here are the
> available partitions:
> Kerne
On 06/22/2010 09:37 PM, kashani wrote:
> For the record only Sun servers have ever made me utter, "Let me get
> this straight. I have to update the firware on the POWER SUPPLY too?!?"
> E6500s circa '99.
:-)
And the "hotswap" E250 power supply. You know, the one that you have to
tell the kern
On 06/22/2010 05:35 PM, rocwhite168 wrote:
>>> Yes, it's built-in. I have attached a copy of my kernel config file in the
>>> original post.
>>
>> I'll bet you don't have HUGETLBFS turned on in your kernel. It's
>> required for ext4.
>>
>
> I checked and both HUGETLBFS and HUGETLB_PAGE are enable
On 06/22/2010 02:56 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
>
> again ... I consider buying a new box for work.
>
> currently I am still quite happy with my core2duo E6600 with 8 gigs of
> ram, running ~amd64 ... running fine.
>
> but I remember the huge step back then from the pentium 4 ...
>
> Will i
On 06/22/2010 12:29 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> On Dienstag 22 Juni 2010, walt wrote:
>> On 06/22/2010 11:44 AM, Dale wrote:
>>> Tanstaafl wrote:
>>>> On 2010-06-18 12:17 PM, Bill Longman wrote:
>>>>> And finally, don't even mention how br
On 06/21/2010 03:37 PM, Dale wrote:
> I'm not saying you can't use it just that it doesn't always work. Thing
> is, when someone uses genkernel to make the kernel, when someone asks
> 'did you include some driver', the usual answer is 'I don't know, I used
> genkernel' and then nobody knows whethe
On 06/21/2010 10:20 PM, rocwhite168 wrote:
> Dale gmail.com> writes:
>
>>
>> I notice you are using ext4 for the root partition file system. Do you
>> have support for ext4 compiled in the kernel? Not as a module but built
>> into the kernel? Using modules is OK but things that it has to h
On 06/21/2010 01:23 PM, Dale wrote:
>> The only thing that genkernel would add is your initrd. The kernel is
>> exactly the same, whether you compile it with "make" or through
>> "genkernel". Do a test and you'll see. (I'm assuming we're both talking
>> about gentoo-sources, not vanilla-sources. Ei
On 06/21/2010 12:01 PM, Dale wrote:
> Alex Schuster wrote:
>> Dale writes:
>>
>>
>>> I don't use genkernel anymore. I just roll my own. That way, I know
>>> what is in there and what is not. Then if something doesn't work, I
>>> know if it is the kernel or something else. With genkernel, you
> This is funny. I have NEVER got a genkernel to work on my system.
> Actually, on any system. I'm not sure the OP would know that kernel is
> any better then the one he makes.
Dale,
If you've never gotten genkernel to work, you should try this little
script that I've used for the past few ye
On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 10:15 AM, Jarry wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I modified /etc/resolv.conf (added opendns-servers in addition
> to my own), but I do not know what I should restart for these
> changes to come into effect...
>
> I could restart the whole system, but there sure must be some
> cleaner way.
On 06/18/2010 11:29 AM, Christopher Kurtis Koeber wrote:
> I am sure this is simple but I can't figure this out. I added a network
> card to an existing Gentoo installation to have two in total. *ETH1* is
> my new network card which is a Gigabit connection and *ETH0* is my old
> network card with j
On 06/18/2010 08:17 AM, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
> I'm running grub 2 it seems. I don't know when that started, or what
> difference it makes compared to legacy grub. I guess I don't need to
> know. But a recent post had me looking at use-flags, and I was a bit
> surprised to find (ncurses -static)
On 06/17/2010 06:03 PM, Walter Dnes wrote:
> Just recently switched to a backup machine and I notice the following.
> Some time ago, I had tried Virtualbox, and uninstalled it. I still get
> the following as the final 2 lines of the bootup process...
>
> * Starting VirtualBox kernel module ...
On 06/17/2010 05:23 PM, Walter Dnes wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 08:02:25AM -0700, Bill Longman wrote
>> On 06/16/2010 05:33 PM, walt wrote:
>>> On 06/16/2010 02:29 PM, Thomas Revell wrote:
>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>
>>>> I've got a bi
On 06/16/2010 05:33 PM, walt wrote:
> On 06/16/2010 02:29 PM, Thomas Revell wrote:
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> I've got a bit of a problem with a new Gentoo install that I'm currently
>> trying to install KDE on. The installation of kdebase/kfilereplace-4.3.5
>> is failing, apparently due to a missing he
201 - 228 of 228 matches
Mail list logo
