Re: [gentoo-user] Creating Blue-ray video discs

2020-06-02 Thread Joerg Schilling
Laurence Perkins wrote: > note that blu-ray r and re disks are only bit stable for about 5 years. i > recommend dvdisaster for upping the amount of ecc data to reduce your lossage. This does not apply to decent media. Rewritable disks should all be usable for at least 50 years, BD-R based on

Re: [gentoo-user] Creating Blue-ray video discs

2020-05-29 Thread Joerg Schilling
Ashley Dixon wrote: > On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 11:57:32AM +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote: > > I don't believe this was the question. > > > > cdrecord of course writes BluRays since 2007, but the question was for > > software > > that prepares the data to

Re: [gentoo-user] Creating Blue-ray video discs

2020-05-29 Thread Joerg Schilling
Ashley Dixon wrote: > Have you tried Xfburn (`app-cdr/xfburn`) ? Unfortunately it is a > graphical > application (GTK+) with a somewhat-ugly user interface, but does claim to > burn > Blu-Rays. I can only vouch for its stability with standard D.V.D.s, > although > it's worth a try.

Re: [gentoo-user] Per package /bin/sh selection

2020-04-09 Thread Joerg Schilling
Mike Gilbert wrote: > > Well, bosh has been tested to work as /bin/sh on Gentoo. > > BTW: On Solaris, bosh is faster than dash (because Solaris has a fully > > working > > vfork()). On Linux bosh is "only" of the same speed as dash since vfork() on > > Linux does not borrow the parents address s

Re: [gentoo-user] Per package /bin/sh selection

2020-04-08 Thread Joerg Schilling
Mike Gilbert wrote: > Wikipedia says that dash is a fork of NetBSD's ash, and I do see tests > in their CVS repo. That might be worth looking into. > > http://cvsweb.netbsd.org/bsdweb.cgi/src/tests/bin/sh/ I see this is the variant from Rihard Elz, so it may make sense. The original ash is too b

Re: [gentoo-user] Per package /bin/sh selection

2020-04-08 Thread Joerg Schilling
Michael Orlitzky wrote: > Thanks, this will be a PITA for a while (again). Another developer had > patched /bin/dash so that it was effectively broken, to the point where > ./configure scripts would decide on their own use bash instead (even if > you set /bin/sh to point to dash). This "fixed" th

Re: [gentoo-user] Software for checking CDs and DVDs for errors?

2018-12-20 Thread Joerg Schilling
Steve Dibb wrote: > On 12/4/18 3:31 AM, Joerg Schilling wrote: > > Dale wrote: > > > >> So as usual, they are not very Linux friendly.  Figures.  I was hoping > > > > The main problem with Linux is that the drivers at SCSI level in the kernel > > a

Re: [gentoo-user] Software for checking CDs and DVDs for errors?

2018-12-20 Thread Joerg Schilling
Steve Dibb wrote: > > With software that operates at block driver level, you depend on the error > > recovery features from the OS driver. > > OS driver, do you mean for SCSI in Linux or the driver for that ATA chipset? No, the high level driver that deals with attached hard disks and that also

Re: [gentoo-user] Software for checking CDs and DVDs for errors?

2018-12-14 Thread Joerg Schilling
Steve Dibb wrote: > On 12/3/18 9:27 AM, Pouru Lasse wrote: > > I've got a bunch of scratched disc-based games (PS2, Xbox 360) that I'd > > like to check for errors. Is there any program for Linux that does this? > > I found and tried dvdisaster, but it only works for CDs, not > > DVDs. Everything

Re: [gentoo-user] Software for checking CDs and DVDs for errors?

2018-12-04 Thread Joerg Schilling
Andrew Udvare wrote: > PS1 and PS2 games can be checked without special hardware in this case, > but for others, specific hardware is required. Games on DVD are a general problem as I expect them to contain intentionally "unreadable sectors" that can neither be distinct from unreadable sectors

Re: [gentoo-user] Software for checking CDs and DVDs for errors?

2018-12-04 Thread Joerg Schilling
Dale wrote: > So as usual, they are not very Linux friendly.  Figures.  I was hoping The main problem with Linux is that the drivers at SCSI level in the kernel are worse than they could be, so if you like to get better results, you should encourage the kernel people to do their homework. One

Re: [gentoo-user] Software for checking CDs and DVDs for errors?

2018-12-04 Thread Joerg Schilling
Francesco Turco wrote: > ddrescue? Are you sure this helps? >From the name, it sounds like it does not understand SCSI level, but this is required for best recovery results, as the problems usually are in the bad implementation at the drivers at kernel level. Jörg -- EMail:jo...@schily.ne

Re: [gentoo-user] Software for checking CDs and DVDs for errors?

2018-12-04 Thread Joerg Schilling
Pouru Lasse wrote: > I've got a bunch of scratched disc-based games (PS2, Xbox 360) that I'd > like to check for errors. Is there any program for Linux that does this? > I found and tried dvdisaster, but it only works for CDs, not > DVDs. Everything else seems to be Windows-only. I am not sure w

Re: [gentoo-user] NFS and user IDs

2018-06-12 Thread Joerg Schilling
Wols Lists wrote: > On 11/06/18 09:54, Joerg Schilling wrote: > > Well, "Windows ACLs" is the only ACL system that is standardized (as part > > of > > the NFSv4 standard). The old proposal in POSIX.1e from 1993 from Sun has > > been > > withdrawn

Re: [gentoo-user] NFS and user IDs

2018-06-11 Thread Joerg Schilling
Wol's lists wrote: > On 09/06/18 18:09, Rich Freeman wrote: ... > > downsides as well, in particular it is certainly more complex and at > > work we practically forbid any kind of windows ACLs at anything other > > than the top mount level because it is so hard to control. > > Windows is better t

Re: [gentoo-user] [off-topic] Ripping "enhanced" CDs with abcde/cdparanoia

2018-03-05 Thread Joerg Schilling
Lasse Pouru wrote: > I'll try installing the unstable version of libcdio-paranoia in case > this is a bug that has recently been fixed. Be careful, this is very old and buggy cdparanoia code. If you like to have a fixed libcdparanoia, look at the code that comes with cdrtools since 2004. Jörg

Re: [gentoo-user] [off-topic] Ripping "enhanced" CDs with abcde/cdparanoia

2018-03-05 Thread Joerg Schilling
Lasse Pouru wrote: > You know, the ones with video or software tracks shoehorned into the > end. Whenever I try to rip one with abcde I get the error "selected span > contains non audio track at track X", even when I've chosen a range not > containing track X (e.g. abcde 1-11, 12 being the non-au

Re: [gentoo-user] Failed builds of kbuild and cdrdao with "undefined reference to `__alloca'"

2018-02-12 Thread Joerg Schilling
wrote: > On 02/09 10:02, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: > > Am Sonntag, 4. Februar 2018, 15:03:28 CET schrieb tu...@posteo.de: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I still have the problem of failed builds due to an > > > 'undefined reference to `__alloca''. I recompiled > > > gcc/glibc and I am using linux-4.15.1

Re: [gentoo-user] Expect a ~15% average slowdown if you use an Intel processor

2018-01-05 Thread Joerg Schilling
Rich Freeman wrote: > On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 8:52 PM, Jalus Bilieyich wrote: > > Is my Pentium D from 2007 affected? > > > > Any Intel x86 chip after and including the Pentium Pro should be > affected. That came out in 1995. The Pentium D is almost certainly > vulnerable. There was a statemen

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: xcdroast 0.98alpha16: Empty CD

2017-12-14 Thread Joerg Schilling
Hartmut Figge wrote: > I can imagine that finding the issue was tricky. It was hard to trace as the problem is a result of a non-matching variable <-> format string in the option parser and the incorrect variable was not "outfd" but "userverbose". Jörg -- EMail:jo...@schily.net

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: xcdroast 0.98alpha16: Empty CD

2017-12-14 Thread Joerg Schilling
Helmut Jarausch wrote: > Perhaps you create an strace log and I'll compare that to one on my > machine. > My whole machine is on "Gentoo unstable" - though it's very stable. Since the problem is an "int" variable that should have been "long", there is no chance to detect the problem with sysc

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: xcdroast 0.98alpha16: Empty CD

2017-12-14 Thread Joerg Schilling
Hartmut Figge wrote: > Helmut Jarausch: > >On 12/13/2017 07:36:54 PM, Hartmut Figge wrote: > > >I have app-cdr/cdrtools 3.02_alpha07-r1 installed here. > > At the moment 3.02_alpha06, but I've tested the unstable version of > cdrtools also. You need at least 3.02a08 that has been published in:

Re: [gentoo-user] xcdroast 0.98alpha16: Empty CD

2017-12-14 Thread Joerg Schilling
Hartmut Figge wrote: > Greetings, > > on my current machine xcdroast fails to recognize an inserted CD in the > CD-reader. I do not often burn CDs and had switched to cdw which works > fine. Nevertheless, xcdroast was once my favorite and I am curious. :) > > Starting xcdroast with -d 10 shows th

Re: [gentoo-user] Make failed to compile: symbol __alloca not found...

2017-12-12 Thread Joerg Schilling
Raffaele Belardi wrote: > > Or dig into why the following happens, i.e. why is __alloca not > > defined in glob_in_dir() ... > > > > I don't think it's glibc, here make compiles fine: It is built into gcc, but you need the right include file that defines: #define alloca(x) __builtin_al

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Don't miss the 1 500 000 000 Unix second!

2017-07-17 Thread Joerg Schilling
Grant Edwards wrote: > Well, the return type for time() changed from "int" (or was it long?) > to "time_t" many years back. That said, the actual underlying > representation has never changed on 32-bit Linux systems. Posix > requires it to be signed, and on 32-bit Linux systems, it's still > go

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Don't miss the 1 500 000 000 Unix second!

2017-07-14 Thread Joerg Schilling
Matthias Hanft wrote: > Neil Bothwick wrote: > > > > That's a relief, I though we were in for another Y2K-like apocalypse. > > As far as I know, next apocalypse is scheduled for January 19th, 2038, > 03:14:08 UTC, isn't it? > > At that time, I'll be 73 years old, and I hope I'm not gonna be sysa

Re: [gentoo-user] Recommended CDR-Burning-frontend without QT and without KDE?

2017-03-15 Thread Joerg Schilling
wrote: > is it possible to run xcdroast without root ( i.e. user root or suid > )? Unfortunately xcdroast did miss that Linux finally implemented working support for fine grained privileges 4 years ago. In theory, you should be able to convert the suid wrapper it installs into a no-op wrappe

Re: [gentoo-user] Recommended CDR-Burning-frontend without QT and without KDE?

2017-03-14 Thread Joerg Schilling
Miroslav Rovis wrote: > growisofs, cdrecord, and friends ...mkisofs for cdrecord, IIRC ...I use > it rarely nowadays... > > but none (assisting other programs) actually if it's data to burn on DVD > or BD, growisofs is fine solo there... ??? cdrecord supports DVDs since March 1998 which makes i

Re: [gentoo-user] Bringing mdocml to Gentoo, MANPATH woes

2017-01-04 Thread Joerg Schilling
Joerg Schilling wrote: > I do no longer remember what triggered the problem. Very simple tables are > working. I should have mentioned that "mandoc" is IIRC 4x larger than the complete UNIX "man" subsystem made from: man(1) nroff(1) troff(1)

Re: [gentoo-user] Bringing mdocml to Gentoo, MANPATH woes

2017-01-04 Thread Joerg Schilling
Wolfgang Mueller wrote: > On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 16:32:02 +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote: > > If you think about replacing "man" by "mandoc", please keep in mind that > > "mandoc" displays many of the man pages incorrectly. > > > >

Re: [gentoo-user] Bringing mdocml to Gentoo, MANPATH woes

2017-01-04 Thread Joerg Schilling
Wolfgang Mueller wrote: > Hello, list. > > For the past few days I have been working on bringing mdocml to Gentoo > as a full alternative to man-db. In the course of writing the ebuild, > I have come across some issues on which I would like to have some If you think about replacing "man" by "man

Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] -print0 but with 'locate'

2016-09-03 Thread Joerg Schilling
wrote: > Hi, > > I want to 'locate' a bunch of files and feed the output into > '| xargs md5sum'. > Unfortunately some of them are infected with the "file name"-virus > (space in the filename). > With find there is the -print0 option which corresponds to '-0' of > the xargs options. As of my kno

Re: [gentoo-user] LC_COLLATE overridden by LC_ALL?

2016-07-27 Thread Joerg Schilling
Bertram Scharpf wrote: > Why doesn't ls obey LC_COLLATE=C and how can I fix this? try to export it. Jörg -- EMail:jo...@schily.net(home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/ URL: http://cd

Re: [gentoo-user] Xcdroast users : alert

2016-07-07 Thread Joerg Schilling
Philip Webb wrote: > If anyone else uses Xcdroast to write CDs or DVDs, > I suggest they read Bug 345337 & submit appropriate comments. > > There seems to be no problem on single-user systems, > but a 6-year-old bug which applies to multi-user systems > is being used as an excuse to remove Xcdroa

gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org

2016-06-13 Thread Joerg Schilling
Andrew Lowe wrote: > The first thing that comes to mind is an alias. Just off the top of my > head I tried: > > alias "npp=npp %1 &" > > npp being the editor, but that didn't work. Is an alias the best/easiest > way to do this and if so, what would the syntax be, or is there a bette

[gentoo-user] Cdda2wav testers needed

2015-10-20 Thread Joerg Schilling
There have been some problems in cdda2wav that could have been discovered much earlier if there was better feedback. A nasty problem is active since Spring 2014 or even since late 2013 if you did not use c2checks. So the problem (that depends on some compiler constraints) was really visible si

Re: [gentoo-user] CD ripper that generates song titles?

2015-08-27 Thread Joerg Schilling
Walter Dnes wrote: > Thanks. I've now switched from cdparanoia to cdda2wav, like so... > > cdda2wav -vall dev=1,0,0 cddb=0 -paranoia -B > > I get separate tracks and info files, e.g. audio_01.inf, audio_01.wav. > audio_02.inf, audio_02.wav, etc. I can pull the tune and artist from > the Tra

Re: [gentoo-user] CD ripper that generates song titles?

2015-08-27 Thread Joerg Schilling
Fernando Rodriguez wrote: > You can try k3b. It can use cd-text or freedb and encode to most formats. > It is a kde application so it will pull a lot of deps if you don't use kde. k3b unfortunately does not use the best low level code for extraction. Better use cdda2wav in paranoia mode. Jörg

Re: [gentoo-user] CD ripper that generates song titles?

2015-08-27 Thread Joerg Schilling
Heiko Baums wrote: > All of them have freedb support and use cdparanoia as back-end. Cdparanoia is not a good choice, it has many flaws: - It is based on a 1997 cdda2wav and was never updated - It does not create the track based files at the right locations as it does not

Re: [gentoo-user] CD ripper that generates song titles?

2015-08-27 Thread Joerg Schilling
Walter Dnes wrote: > I went to the CNE (Canadian National Exhibition) yesterday and > indulged in a buying spree of 18 CD sets of my fave music (basically > anything pop/rock/country pre-Beatles). I now have over 20 CDs that I > want to rip to flac eventually. I dread the gruntwork in renamin

Re: [gentoo-user] 'tar xvjpf stage3-*.tar.bz2 --xattrs' failed with unknown option --xattrs

2015-08-06 Thread Joerg Schilling
Rich Freeman wrote: > On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 9:24 PM, Felix Miata wrote: > > I booted x86_64 openSUSE 13.1 HD installation to try to begin Gentoo > > installation, beginning from "Unpacking the stage tarball" on > > https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Handbook:X86/Installation/Stage : > > > > #

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Anyone else having a problem with bash?

2015-07-13 Thread Joerg Schilling
Martin Vaeth wrote: > Joerg Schilling wrote: > > > > bash vs. POSIX, as bash tried to ignore long existing > > rules just because the bash maintainer did not understand them. > > Are there really several? I know only one such example: One is that "sh -ce cmd

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Anyone else having a problem with bash?

2015-07-13 Thread Joerg Schilling
Martin Vaeth wrote: > Joerg Schilling wrote: > > Martin Vaeth wrote: > >> > >> This is not true, either: Although finally bash took some of the > >> features of zsh (arrays, regular expression matching, etc.) there > >> are still many feat

Re: [gentoo-user] Securely deletion of an HDD

2015-07-13 Thread Joerg Schilling
Marc Joliet wrote: > Hi, > > I have to failed drives that I want to give away for recycling purposes, but > want to be sure to properly clear them first. They used be part of a btrfs The test patterns used on Solaris and marked with "federal requirements" are: int purge_patterns[]= {

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Anyone else having a problem with bash?

2015-07-13 Thread Joerg Schilling
Martin Vaeth wrote: > Neil Bothwick wrote: > > > > In one sub-thread we've so far managed to cover: > > > > Bash vs Zsh > > Vim vs Emacs > > Perl vs Python > > not to forget: POSIX vs Bash Let us better call it bash vs. POSIX, as bash tried to ignore long existing rules just because the bash m

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Anyone else having a problem with bash?

2015-07-13 Thread Joerg Schilling
Martin Vaeth wrote: > Neil Bothwick wrote: > > As a > > scripting language, Bash is probably better > > This is not true, either: Although finally bash took some of the > features of zsh (arrays, regular expression matching, etc.) there > are still many features missing in bash (extended globbin

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Anyone else having a problem with bash?

2015-07-13 Thread Joerg Schilling
Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > On 10/07/15 02:34, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > > I tried it [zsh], for exactly 10 seconds. My home/end keys didn't work. This > > gave me the impression of an unfinished project. Why on earth would > > anyone release a program after 1990 that doesn't know the home/end ke

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Anyone else having a problem with bash?

2015-07-08 Thread Joerg Schilling
Sun Microsystems > Copyright (C) 1982-2015 Joerg Schilling > > > Now I cannot reproduce the no-echo issue, at least with my ssh method. > But as I said, I also couldn't do it with `bash --posix`. So this seems > somehow related. The non-POSIX Bash seems to trigger something an

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Anyone else having a problem with bash?

2015-07-08 Thread Joerg Schilling
Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > On 06/07/15 20:01, walt wrote: > > This is the problem: occasionally bash gets in a state where it stops > > echoing the characters I type. The commands I type continue to work > > properly and I can see the output from them but I can't see the commands > > on the scr

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Anyone else having a problem with bash?

2015-07-08 Thread Joerg Schilling
Florian Gamböck wrote: > Hi Stephan, > > Am 08.07.2015 um 11:28 schrieb Stephan Müller: > > As you can replicate it reliable, did you test it in Bourne shell? > > Maybe its not related to bash at all? > > $ echo $SHELL > /bin/bash Sorry for asking, but does Gentoo include the Bourne Shell? If

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: writing man pages (gentoo conventions)

2015-06-03 Thread Joerg Schilling
Grant Edwards wrote: > The easiest thing to do is to grab the source for an existing man page > and start editing... If you use one of sufficient quality ;-) Jörg -- EMail:jo...@schily.net(home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de (wor

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: writing man pages (gentoo conventions)

2015-06-03 Thread Joerg Schilling
James wrote: > Joerg Schilling fokus.fraunhofer.de> writes: > > > > man -s5 man > > man 7 man If you like to read the original aman -s5 man, look here: http://schillix.sourceforge.net/man/man5/man.5.html It contains a cookbook for a typical man page.

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: writing man pages (gentoo conventions)

2015-06-03 Thread Joerg Schilling
Martin Vaeth wrote: > James wrote: > > > > So instead of my spew of ascii information files, I'm now composing > > 'man pages' mostly using txt2man. > > If you want to avoid learning *roff, there is also e.g. pod from perl > which gives you simple basic markup functionality and can output in > m

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Damaged CD medium

2015-03-19 Thread Joerg Schilling
Mick wrote: > > I managed to recover the files on the CD! I used ddrescue which eventually > was able to read the media and then ran photorec to retrieve the jpeg photos > from the rescued image. > > ddrescue could not read the CD every time, but reinserting a few times on my > laptop managed

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Damaged CD medium

2015-03-19 Thread Joerg Schilling
Mick wrote: > > This is an error at the layer above the audio sector. You may try to use: > > > > cdrecord -noerror -edc-corr > > I think you meant to say: > > readcd -noerror -edc-corr You are of course correct. > This is was I am getting. > > # readcd -noerror -edc-corr > No target specif

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Damaged CD medium

2015-03-16 Thread Joerg Schilling
Mick wrote: > scsibus2: > 2,0,0 200) 'PIONEER ' 'BD-RW BDR-209D' '1.10' Removable CD-ROM > 2,1,0 201) * > 2,2,0 202) * > 2,3,0 203) * > 2,4,0 204) * > 2,5,0 205) * > 2,6,0 206) * > 2,7,0 207) * Pioneer is a good manufacturer...

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Damaged CD medium

2015-03-16 Thread Joerg Schilling
Mick wrote: > The resultant disk5.out is 0 bytes. Even when I try to start from sector 1 > or > 2, I end up with 0 byte output file. Any other settings I could try? did you try to read the man page? Jörg -- EMail:jo...@schily.net(home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Damaged CD medium

2015-03-16 Thread Joerg Schilling
Mick wrote: > On Friday 13 Mar 2015 22:24:32 Neil Bothwick wrote: > > On Fri, 13 Mar 2015 17:54:01 + (UTC), Grant Edwards wrote: > > > IIRC, there are ebuilds for ddrescue, photorec, and testdisk. > > > > There's also app-cdr/dvdisaster. > > Thank you all. dd and ddrescue don't work, becaus

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Damaged CD medium

2015-03-13 Thread Joerg Schilling
Grant Edwards wrote: > On 2015-03-13, Mick wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > I was given a CD with some pictures, but I am not able to mount it. This > > is > > what dmesg reveals: > > Here's what I recommend. > > 1) Use ddrescue to read as many data blocks as you can off the CD. > > http://w

Re: [gentoo-user] No burners are currently available

2014-12-19 Thread Joerg Schilling
Joseph wrote: > I've tried to burn a dvd from a command line: > cdrecord -v -eject -dao speed=4 dev=0,0,0 dvd.iso > > but I got a generic error message that it is not possible. Not sending the message does not help. BTW: You specified dev=0,0,0, why did you do that? Since 2004, cdrecord automat

Re: [gentoo-user] No burners are currently available

2014-12-19 Thread Joerg Schilling
Joseph wrote: > When I start Xfburn I get a message: > No burners are currently available > Possibly the disc(s) are in use, and cannot get accessed. > > How to check which program is using the DVD drive? > "ps fax" is not showing that any program is using it. There is no useful SCSI locking on

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Shutdown, Gentoo and the Arietta.G25

2014-12-02 Thread Joerg Schilling
James wrote: > gmx.de> writes: > > > > > > But: Shutdown (as recommmended by acmesystems "shutdown -h -H now") > > > > REBOOTS the system instead of powering it down. > > > > What about "halt"? man halt > > > The problem I think is burried > > Okay, ferret it out. > > Does this accomplish wh

Re: [gentoo-user] Debian forked, because of systemd brouhaha

2014-12-01 Thread Joerg Schilling
Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Sun, 30 Nov 2014 13:01:33 +, Mick wrote: > > > Nevertheless, I support moving away from a RHL sponsored > > monolithic binary and hopefully if not today it will happen eventually. > > systemd isn't monolithic so I can only assume you are referring to the > Linux ker

Re: [gentoo-user] NFS & static ports - driving me crazy...

2013-12-30 Thread Joerg Schilling
Bruce Hill wrote: > > Why don't you just use NFSv4? > > NFSv4 was designed to interact well with firewalls. > > > > Jörg > > It just so happens that I'm setting up NFS atm using this guide: > https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/NFSv4 This info unfortunately misses the port number: 2049 Jörg -- EMa

Re: [gentoo-user] NFS & static ports - driving me crazy...

2013-12-30 Thread Joerg Schilling
Tanstaafl wrote: > Ok, my google-fu has failed me... > > I've found a few sites that describe how to set static ports for NFS > mounting remote shares (I use iptables for both inbound AND outbound, > and it is the outbound I'm having trouble with). Why don't you just use NFSv4? NFSv4 was desig

Re: [gentoo-user] ZFS

2013-09-20 Thread Joerg Schilling
Douglas J Hunley wrote: > 1TB drives are right on the border of switching from RAIDZ to RAIDZ2. > You'll see people argue for both sides at this size, but the 'saner > default' would be to use RAIDZ2. You're going to lose storage space, but > gain an extra parity drive (think RAID6). Consumer gra

Re: [gentoo-user] ZFS

2013-09-19 Thread Joerg Schilling
Dale wrote: > > Why do you believe it has forked? > > This project does not even has a source code repository and the fact that > > they refer to illumos for sources makes me wonder whether it is open for > > contributing. > > > > Jörg > > > > Well, it seemed to me that it either changed its nam

Re: [gentoo-user] ZFS

2013-09-19 Thread Joerg Schilling
Dale wrote: > Grant wrote: > >>> Interesting news related to ZFS: > >>> > >>> http://open-zfs.org/wiki/Main_Page > >> I wonder if this will be added to the kernel at some point in the > >> future? May even be their intention? > > I think the CDDL license is what's keeping ZFS out of the kernel,

Re: [gentoo-user] ZFS

2013-09-19 Thread Joerg Schilling
Grant wrote: > >> Interesting news related to ZFS: > >> > >> http://open-zfs.org/wiki/Main_Page > > > > I wonder if this will be added to the kernel at some point in the > > future? May even be their intention? > > I think the CDDL license is what's keeping ZFS out of the kernel, > although some

Re: [gentoo-user] ZFS

2013-09-18 Thread Joerg Schilling
Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: > turn off readahead. ZFS' own readahead and the kernel's clash - badly. > Turn off kernel's readahead for a visible performance boon. You are probably not talking about ZFS readahead but about the ARC. Jörg -- EMail:jo...@schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) Jörg S

Re: [gentoo-user] ZFS

2013-09-17 Thread Joerg Schilling
Grant wrote: > >> Performance doesn't seem to be one of ZFS's strong points. Is it > >> considered suitable for a high-performance server? > > > > ZFS is one of the fastest FS I am aware of (if not the fastest). > > You need a sufficient amount of RAM to make the ARC useful. > > How much RAM is

Re: [gentoo-user] ZFS

2013-09-17 Thread Joerg Schilling
Grant wrote: > Performance doesn't seem to be one of ZFS's strong points. Is it > considered suitable for a high-performance server? ZFS is one of the fastest FS I am aware of (if not the fastest). You need a sufficient amount of RAM to make the ARC useful. The only problem I am aware with ZFS

Re: Integrated ZFS for Gentoo - WAS Re: [gentoo-user] Optional /usr merge in Gentoo

2013-09-04 Thread Joerg Schilling
Mark David Dumlao wrote: > containing the kernel is > also a zfs filesystem, then your grub needs a driver that can read > that filesystem. > > Well sys-boot/grub-2.00 provides one. See /boot/grub/zfs.mod You don't need grub2, a capable older grub does it also, see: http://hg.berlios.de/repos/s

Re: Integrated ZFS for Gentoo - WAS Re: [gentoo-user] Optional /usr merge in Gentoo

2013-09-04 Thread Joerg Schilling
Walter Dnes wrote: > > Grub works this way: > > > > 1) It loads /platform/i86pc/kernel/$ISADIR/unix > > Question... how does it read that file off a ZFS partition? OK, so > ZFS code has to be installed statically into GRUB instead of statically > into the kernel. Please stop the shell game.

Re: Integrated ZFS for Gentoo - WAS Re: [gentoo-user] Optional /usr merge in Gentoo

2013-09-02 Thread Joerg Schilling
Mark David Dumlao wrote: > > > > the disk... OOPS. This is a classic "chicken and egg" situation. > > > > > > On Solaris no problem with loadable modules - everything is > > > dynamically loaded. ***YOU NEED A GRUB THAT UNDERSTANDS ZFS AND THAT > > > GIVES A ZFS INTERFACE TO THE KERNEL TO USE B

Re: Integrated ZFS for Gentoo - WAS Re: [gentoo-user] Optional /usr merge in Gentoo

2013-09-01 Thread Joerg Schilling
Walter Dnes wrote: > You can get away with most stuff as modules; ***BUT NOT THE ROOT > FILESYSTEM***. Think about it for a minute. Gentoo reads modules off > the disk. If the code for the root filesystem is a module, Gentoo would > have to read the module off the disk to enable it to read t

Re: Integrated ZFS for Gentoo - WAS Re: [gentoo-user] Optional /usr merge in Gentoo

2013-08-31 Thread Joerg Schilling
Gregory Shearman wrote: > In linux.gentoo.user, Mr Schilling wrote: > > > > On Solaris, you can disable loading unsigned modules, is this not > > supported by > > Linux? > > CONFIG_MODULE_SIG So there seems to be no real need to create a static linux kernel with ZFS inside. Jörg -- EMail

Re: Integrated ZFS for Gentoo - WAS Re: [gentoo-user] Optional /usr merge in Gentoo

2013-08-31 Thread Joerg Schilling
Tanstaafl wrote: > On 2013-08-31 1:10 AM, Mark David Dumlao wrote: > > Sounds like an awful lot of trouble for a "problem" that's already solved by > > installing sys-kernel/module-rebuild and running "module-rebuild rebuild" > > after every kernel update, which is how nvidia, broadcom, and othe

Re: Integrated ZFS for Gentoo - WAS Re: [gentoo-user] Optional /usr merge in Gentoo

2013-08-31 Thread Joerg Schilling
Pandu Poluan wrote: > Well, if you follow Tanstaafl in the other thread, you'll see that he > wants ZFS to be integrated into the kernel, not existing as a kernel > module. > But why does someone want things to be inside a static kernel? Since 1991/1992, Solaris does not have anything in the st

Re: [gentoo-user] Optional /usr merge in Gentoo

2013-08-28 Thread Joerg Schilling
Tanstaafl wrote: > On 2013-08-27 5:06 PM, Joerg Schilling > wrote: > > You wrote that modules become derivatives of the Linux kernel and this is > > the > > same as writing ZFS would become a kernel derivative. > > Just for clarification, I was talking about com

Re: [gentoo-user] Optional /usr merge in Gentoo

2013-08-27 Thread Joerg Schilling
Alan McKinnon wrote: > >> That's a question of packaging and bundling, which is not covered by the > >> GPL. But kernel code and kernel modules are not mere bundles, they are > >> derivative works by virtue of how tightly they integrate with the > >> kernel, and how the code can only ever run unc

Re: [gentoo-user] Optional /usr merge in Gentoo

2013-08-27 Thread Joerg Schilling
Alan McKinnon wrote: > The permissions issue is an artifact of how NFS works. Sun designed it > to deliver entire filesystems over the network (most often /usr and-or > /home) to trusted clients. "trusted" being the operative word. To get > Unix permissions to work, the uid on the share and clien

Re: [gentoo-user] Optional /usr merge in Gentoo

2013-08-27 Thread Joerg Schilling
Joerg Schilling wrote: > Alan McKinnon wrote: > > > > Isn't it strange that those people seem to have less problems with closed > > > source than with a license that gives more freedom than the GPL? But > > > you are correct that the problem se

Re: [gentoo-user] Optional /usr merge in Gentoo

2013-08-27 Thread Joerg Schilling
Alan McKinnon wrote: > > Isn't it strange that those people seem to have less problems with closed > > source than with a license that gives more freedom than the GPL? But > > you are correct that the problem seem to be humans and not a license text. > > You are aware that the GPL was not reall

Re: [gentoo-user] Optional /usr merge in Gentoo

2013-08-27 Thread Joerg Schilling
Alan McKinnon wrote: > > The law can! > > > > The GPL is in conflict with the law and therefore the parts you have in > > mind > > are just void. > > Which law is the GPL in conflict with, and in which jurisdiction, and > what is the extent of the conflict? The GPL is in conflict with US Copy

Re: [gentoo-user] Optional /usr merge in Gentoo

2013-08-27 Thread Joerg Schilling
Alan McKinnon wrote: > > People who believe that there is a problem use a wrong interpretation of > > the > > GPL. The CDDL definitely does not prevent combinations with other software. > > The problem is not with CDDL, the problem is with the GPL. > > ZFS in the kernel requires that ZFS as shi

Re: [gentoo-user] Optional /usr merge in Gentoo

2013-08-27 Thread Joerg Schilling
Alan McKinnon wrote: > The issue is that the Linux kernel devs consider the license terms for > ZFS to be incompatible with GPL-2.0 and therefore ZFS cannot be > redistributed as a Linux kernel module. Isn't it strange that those people seem to have less problems with closed source than with a

Re: [gentoo-user] Optional /usr merge in Gentoo

2013-08-27 Thread Joerg Schilling
Thomas Mueller wrote: > On the issue of whether ZFS can be shipped with the Linux kernel, FreeBSD > includes ZFS with the kernel, binary and source. > > So does that mean it would be OK for Linux too? > > FreeBSD has a different license (BSD) than Linux (GPL 2 or 3). For FreeBSD, things are les

Re: [gentoo-user] Optional /usr merge in Gentoo

2013-08-26 Thread Joerg Schilling
Neil Bothwick wrote: > > Did you ever read the CDDL? > > Not completely. You should do it - it is even much shorter then GPLv3 > > People who believe that there is a problem use a wrong interpretation > > of the GPL. The CDDL definitely does not prevent combinations with > > other software. >

Re: [gentoo-user] Optional /usr merge in Gentoo

2013-08-26 Thread Joerg Schilling
Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Mon, 26 Aug 2013 19:30:05 +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote: > > > > The licensing conflict means that would not be possible. You have the > > > install the kernel source and then merge in the ZFS source yourself, > > > it can&

Re: [gentoo-user] Optional /usr merge in Gentoo

2013-08-26 Thread Joerg Schilling
Neil Bothwick wrote: > > Would be nice if there was a kernel overlay for this... > > The licensing conflict means that would not be possible. You have the > install the kernel source and then merge in the ZFS source yourself, it > can't be done for you and distributed. Why do you believe this?

Re: [gentoo-user] k3b burning BD-Disk pretends to fail at 99.99%

2013-07-14 Thread Joerg Schilling
Thomas Schmitt wrote: > Hi, > > > Okay, then, is your patch necessary when using this command: > > growisofs -dvd-compat -Z /dev/sr0=image.iso > > with a DVD? > > No. I do not know about any growisofs flaws with DVD. As mentioned before: growisofs does not correctly follow the SCSI standard and

Re: [gentoo-user] k3b burning BD-Disk pretends to fail at 99.99%

2013-07-14 Thread Joerg Schilling
Thomas Schmitt wrote: > Hi, > > > However, your patch is for growisofs, which in Gentoo comes from > > app-cdr/dvd+rw-tools, so the proper place for such patch would be > > per http://fy.chalmers.se/~appro/linux/DVD+RW/ -- > > On that list there was support by Andy Polykov until shortly > after

Re: [gentoo-user] k3b burning BD-Disk pretends to fail at 99.99%

2013-07-14 Thread Joerg Schilling
Thomas Schmitt wrote: > Hi, > > > An account is required, running Gentoo is not. > > I understood it was for users who encounter bugs in Gentoo. > That would be Alex, the OP. > > As i stressed too much already, the growisofs bug should be > fixed in any case. > > If it is possible to let K3b use

Re: [gentoo-user] k3b burning BD-Disk pretends to fail at 99.99%

2013-07-14 Thread Joerg Schilling
Alexander Puchmayr wrote: > I just made a simple test by renaming growisofs and then attemting to create > a > BD-RE disk (Re-recordables are nice, sine non-RW media don't grow in my > garden > ;-) > > Result: k3b complained that it cannot find growisofs and that it won't be > possible to cr

Re: [gentoo-user] k3b burning BD-Disk pretends to fail at 99.99%

2013-07-10 Thread Joerg Schilling
Thomas Schmitt wrote: > My proposal is to fix and test growisofs. Well, growisofs is unmaintained since 5 years. The question is whether such a change would be suffucuent or whether there are many more problem (see the mode select problem I mentioned). > joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wr

Re: [gentoo-user] k3b burning BD-Disk pretends to fail at 99.99%

2013-07-10 Thread Joerg Schilling
Thomas Schmitt wrote: > Hi, > > rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote: > > Maybe one of these ideas floating around will help the OP. > > One big problem is the substantial price of BD-R experiments. Well, I am not sure whether you noticed: the OP seems to have turned several BD-Rs into coasters already.

Re: [gentoo-user] k3b burning BD-Disk pretends to fail at 99.99%

2013-07-10 Thread Joerg Schilling
Dale wrote: > I thought it might be worth a mention as a temporary workaround. If the > growisofs file is removed, k3b won't find it and can't use it. Of > course, it may not work at all then either. I'm not a k3b expert but do > use it sometimes. > > Maybe one of these ideas floating around

Re: [gentoo-user] k3b burning BD-Disk pretends to fail at 99.99%

2013-07-10 Thread Joerg Schilling
Thomas Schmitt wrote: > Hi, > > rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote: > > I wonder if he can unmerge growisofs? Or at least remove the file. > > In order to make it use cdrecord for DVD and BD ? > > (Cough.) > > growisofs is unsurpassed with DVD. I am a competitor of it It seems that you are not correcl

Re: [gentoo-user] k3b burning BD-Disk pretends to fail at 99.99%

2013-07-10 Thread Joerg Schilling
Dale wrote: > > I wonder if he can unmerge growisofs? Or at least remove the file. > > Just a thought. If growisofs is not available and if cdrecord at the same time is available, k3b should (if everything works correctly) select cdrecord. This may be a way to go. Jörg -- EMail:jo...@schi

  1   2   3   4   5   >