Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] Being Facebook member: How to anon?

2017-10-23 Thread tuxic
On 10/24 03:58, tu...@posteo.de wrote: > On 10/24 02:12, tu...@posteo.de wrote: > > On 10/24 02:04, tu...@posteo.de wrote: > > > On 10/23 09:33, Róbert Čerňanský wrote: > > > > On Mon, 23 Oct 2017 17:56:40 +0200 > > > > tu...@posteo.de wrote: > > > > > > > > > On 10/23 09:56, Stroller wrote: > > >

Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] Being Facebook member: How to anon?

2017-10-23 Thread tuxic
On 10/24 02:12, tu...@posteo.de wrote: > On 10/24 02:04, tu...@posteo.de wrote: > > On 10/23 09:33, Róbert Čerňanský wrote: > > > On Mon, 23 Oct 2017 17:56:40 +0200 > > > tu...@posteo.de wrote: > > > > > > > On 10/23 09:56, Stroller wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On 22 Oct 2017, at 16:50, tu...@p

Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] Being Facebook member: How to anon?

2017-10-23 Thread tuxic
On 10/24 02:04, tu...@posteo.de wrote: > On 10/23 09:33, Róbert Čerňanský wrote: > > On Mon, 23 Oct 2017 17:56:40 +0200 > > tu...@posteo.de wrote: > > > > > On 10/23 09:56, Stroller wrote: > > > > > > > > > On 22 Oct 2017, at 16:50, tu...@posteo.de wrote: > > > > > > > > > > for its invasive n

Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] Being Facebook member: How to anon?

2017-10-23 Thread tuxic
On 10/23 09:33, Róbert Čerňanský wrote: > On Mon, 23 Oct 2017 17:56:40 +0200 > tu...@posteo.de wrote: > > > On 10/23 09:56, Stroller wrote: > > > > > > > On 22 Oct 2017, at 16:50, tu...@posteo.de wrote: > > > > > > > > for its invasive nature and its data gathering I really dont like > > > > f

Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] Being Facebook member: How to anon?

2017-10-23 Thread tuxic
On 10/23 10:21, Jeriko One wrote: > * Dale [2017-10-22 11:53:36 -0500]: > > > Another thought, what about using Tor to make it so it can't track IPs > > as well?  Joost, you have a thought on that?  > > My approach would be the following > Default browser should block all things owned by Faceboo

Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] Being Facebook member: How to anon?

2017-10-23 Thread tuxic
On 10/23 09:56, Stroller wrote: > > > On 22 Oct 2017, at 16:50, tu...@posteo.de wrote: > > > > for its invasive nature and its data gathering I really dont like > > facebook. > > > > And now it seems that I cant with out it: > > There is a HUGE user group for the Creality CR-10 3D printer there

Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] Being Facebook member: How to anon?

2017-10-22 Thread tuxic
On 10/22 06:39, Alan McKinnon wrote: > On 22/10/2017 16:27, tu...@posteo.de wrote: > > On 10/22 01:58, J. Roeleveld wrote: > >> On 22 October 2017 10:50:01 GMT+02:00, tu...@posteo.de wrote: > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> for its invasive nature and its data gathering I really dont like > >>> facebook. > >>

Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] Being Facebook member: How to anon?

2017-10-22 Thread tuxic
On 10/22 01:58, J. Roeleveld wrote: > On 22 October 2017 10:50:01 GMT+02:00, tu...@posteo.de wrote: > >Hi, > > > >for its invasive nature and its data gathering I really dont like > >facebook. > > > >And now it seems that I cant with out it: > >There is a HUGE user group for the Creality CR-10 3D

[gentoo-user] [OT] Being Facebook member: How to anon?

2017-10-22 Thread tuxic
Hi, for its invasive nature and its data gathering I really dont like facebook. And now it seems that I cant with out it: There is a HUGE user group for the Creality CR-10 3D printer there and veryone and everything is referencing it. My question is: Are there ways (and which ones) to become me

Re: [gentoo-user] OpenScad produces no visible rendering at all

2017-10-20 Thread tuxic
On 10/20 09:53, R0b0t1 wrote: > On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 9:42 PM, wrote: > > On 10/20 09:32, R0b0t1 wrote: > >> On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 8:41 PM, wrote: > >> > Hi, > >> > > >> > After installing OpenScad I started an example. > >> > After the loading process ends I hit "preview" - > >> > a script

Re: [gentoo-user] OpenScad produces no visible rendering at all

2017-10-20 Thread tuxic
On 10/20 09:32, R0b0t1 wrote: > On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 8:41 PM, wrote: > > Hi, > > > > After installing OpenScad I started an example. > > After the loading process ends I hit "preview" - > > a script compiling process starts,,,and > > nothing was shown. > > Same happens, when I hit "renderi

[gentoo-user] OpenScad produces no visible rendering at all

2017-10-20 Thread tuxic
Hi, After installing OpenScad I started an example. After the loading process ends I hit "preview" - a script compiling process starts,,,and nothing was shown. Same happens, when I hit "rendering". from lspci (the smaller card feeds the desktop, the bigger one is for Rendering with Blender on

Re: [gentoo-user] Compiling uranium-2.6.0: Wrong python version, but...

2017-10-19 Thread tuxic
On 10/19 09:24, Marc Joliet wrote: > Am Donnerstag, 19. Oktober 2017, 04:47:18 CEST schrieb tu...@posteo.de: > > Hi, > > > > compiling uranium failed here. From the output: > > -- Using CURA_BINARY_DATA_DIRECTORY from set of environment variables... > > CMake Error at > > /usr/share/cmake/Modules/

Re: [gentoo-user] x11-apps/xinit-1.3.4-r2 is broken

2017-10-19 Thread tuxic
On 10/19 10:15, Peter Humphrey wrote: > Hello list, > > In case anyone else trips over this, as I did today in my routine update, > see https://bugs.gentoo.org/634706. I followed comment 2. > > The symptom is that sddm cannot start KDE, so you have to log in and startx. > > -- > Regards, > Pet

[gentoo-user] Compiling uranium-2.6.0: Wrong python version, but...

2017-10-18 Thread tuxic
Hi, compiling uranium failed here. From the output: -- Using CURA_BINARY_DATA_DIRECTORY from set of environment variables... CMake Error at /usr/share/cmake/Modules/FindPackageHandleStandardArgs.cmake:137 (message): Could NOT find PythonInterp: Found unsuitable version "3.4.6", but required i

[gentoo-user] [OT] cura or (better!) cura ?

2017-10-18 Thread tuxic
Hi, what is the better choice: This one: * media-gfx/cura Available versions: (~)0.15.04.4 (~)0.15.04.5_rc5 (~)2.1.0_beta (~)2.3.1 (~)2.6.0 {+usb PYTHON_SINGLE_TARGET="python3_4 python3_5 python3_6" PYTHON_TARGETS="python2_7 python3_4 python3_5 python3_6"} Homepage:https:/

Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] In search of a certain program...

2017-10-13 Thread tuxic
On 10/14 06:28, Dale wrote: > tu...@posteo.de wrote: > > On 10/14 04:02, John Campbell wrote: > >> On 10/13/2017 08:19 PM, R0b0t1 wrote: > Hi all, > > thanks for all the input! :) > > I am searching for a program called qcalc. I know bc and several > others but -- sorr

Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] In search of a certain program...

2017-10-13 Thread tuxic
On 10/14 04:02, John Campbell wrote: > On 10/13/2017 08:19 PM, R0b0t1 wrote: > >> Hi all, > >> > >> thanks for all the input! :) > >> > >> I am searching for a program called qcalc. I know bc and several > >> others but -- sorry -- this time it has to be qcalc. > >> > >> Does someone knows about th

Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] In search of a certain program...

2017-10-13 Thread tuxic
On 10/13 09:47, Mick wrote: > On Friday, 13 October 2017 10:37:30 BST Mick wrote: > > On Friday, 13 October 2017 04:20:19 BST tu...@posteo.de wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > in a video I saw someone using a neat little commandline tool (no gui) > > > called 'qcalc', with which he performs some intere

[gentoo-user] [OT] In search of a certain program...

2017-10-12 Thread tuxic
Hi, in a video I saw someone using a neat little commandline tool (no gui) called 'qcalc', with which he performs some interesting calculations. I searched the web for it and found this link https://state-machine.com/qtools/qcalc.html#qcalc_linux but it is another type of calculator and it has a

[gentoo-user] Compilation failed: qtwidgets-5.9.2

2017-10-08 Thread tuxic
Hi, compilation of qtwidgets failed. Is there a dependency currently missing in the ebuild? x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-g++ -Wl,-O1 -Wl,--as-needed -Wl,--no-undefined -fuse-ld=gold -Wl,--enable-new-dtags -shared -o libqgtk3.so .obj/main.o .obj/qgtk3dialoghelpers.o .obj/qgtk3menu.o .obj/qgtk3theme.o .

Re: [gentoo-user] Wiki-viewer anyone?

2017-10-07 Thread tuxic
On 10/07 08:19, Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Sat, 7 Oct 2017 00:41:26 +0200, tu...@posteo.de wrote: > > > I dont want to convert the md-files to html, since I want to update > > the repo later (see above). > > The problem are files referencing other files. Reading the md-files > > via vim (for exampl

Re: [gentoo-user] Wiki-viewer anyone?

2017-10-06 Thread tuxic
On 10/06 11:06, Randolph Maaßen wrote: > You might be interested in got hooks [1], especially the post-checkout hook. > > I would try to automatically recompile the md-> HTML on every checkout, so > the HTML is up to date after pulling > > [1] https://git-scm.com/book/gr/v2/Customizing-Git-Git-Ho

Re: [gentoo-user] Wiki-viewer anyone?

2017-10-06 Thread tuxic
On 10/06 05:49, Andrew Tselischev wrote: > On Fri, Oct 06, 2017 at 07:07:04PM +0200, tu...@posteo.de wrote: > > Hi, > > > > The u8g8lib, which contains libraries to drive a great amount of > > displays for mainly embedded electronics has a wiki on github, which > > can be oficially git-pulled as a

[gentoo-user] Wiki-viewer anyone?

2017-10-06 Thread tuxic
Hi, The u8g8lib, which contains libraries to drive a great amount of displays for mainly embedded electronics has a wiki on github, which can be oficially git-pulled as a local copy...which I did. Now I have tons of *.md (markdown) -files instead of html and I dont know of any handy viewer for t

Re: [gentoo-user] Again eix-sync is ...

2017-10-05 Thread tuxic
On 10/05 05:47, Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Thu, 5 Oct 2017 19:04:29 +0200, tu...@posteo.de wrote: > > > got this this evening: > > > > /root>eix-sync > > * push.sh from https://github.com/vaeth/push/ is needed > > [1]5309 exit 2 eix-sync > > Use emerge --sync followed by a world update

[gentoo-user] Again eix-sync is ...

2017-10-05 Thread tuxic
Hi, got this this evening: /root>eix-sync * push.sh from https://github.com/vaeth/push/ is needed [1]5309 exit 2 eix-sync Net is up: >ping www.heise.de PING www.heise.de (193.99.144.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from www.heise.de (193.99.144.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=249 time=49.4 ms 64

Re: [gentoo-user] ....Gentoo update killed Gentoo update?

2017-10-03 Thread tuxic
On 10/04 02:26, tu...@posteo.de wrote: > On 10/04 01:58, Ian Bloss wrote: > > emerge --sync && emerge eix && eix-update > > > > On Tue, Oct 3, 2017, 6:55 PM wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > from my qlop -l output: > > > Tue Oct 3 05:16:48 2017 >>> dev-perl/CGI-Fast-2.120.0 > > > Tue Oct 3 05:1

Re: [gentoo-user] ....Gentoo update killed Gentoo update?

2017-10-03 Thread tuxic
On 10/04 01:58, Ian Bloss wrote: > emerge --sync && emerge eix && eix-update > > On Tue, Oct 3, 2017, 6:55 PM wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > from my qlop -l output: > > Tue Oct 3 05:16:48 2017 >>> dev-perl/CGI-Fast-2.120.0 > > Tue Oct 3 05:17:09 2017 >>> net-dns/dnsmasq-2.78 > > > > Tue Oct 3 05:18

[gentoo-user] ....Gentoo update killed Gentoo update?

2017-10-03 Thread tuxic
Hi, from my qlop -l output: Tue Oct 3 05:16:48 2017 >>> dev-perl/CGI-Fast-2.120.0 Tue Oct 3 05:17:09 2017 >>> net-dns/dnsmasq-2.78 Tue Oct 3 05:18:25 2017 >>> app-portage/eix-0.33.0 Tue Oct 3 05:26:47 2017 >>> sys-apps/openrc-0.32 Tue Oct 3 05:27:54 2017 >>> media-radio/gpredict-1.3-r2 I

Re: [gentoo-user] New Firefox 56.0 ... window size problem

2017-10-02 Thread tuxic
On 10/02 10:31, Marc Joliet wrote: > Am Montag, 2. Oktober 2017, 10:22:37 CEST schrieb tu...@posteo.de: > > Hi, > > > > After the update to FF 56.0 was done, I created a new profile and > > added my previous addons. > > > > Now, the FF opens in half screen width everytime I start it. From what >

Re: [gentoo-user] New Firefox 56.0 ... window size problem

2017-10-02 Thread tuxic
On 10/02 09:08, mad.scientist.at.la...@tutanota.com wrote: > You might try reinstalling it (possibly downloading it again, some bit > patterns tend to damage so as to preserve the checksums, seen it, took 4 > downloads to get a good one before, despite everything looking good, and the > same iss

[gentoo-user] New Firefox 56.0 ... window size problem

2017-10-02 Thread tuxic
Hi, After the update to FF 56.0 was done, I created a new profile and added my previous addons. Now, the FF opens in half screen width everytime I start it. From what I remember, the previous size when closing FF is the next size when openening FF - now it seems to be a somehow hardcoded value.

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Compiling ronn: Missing an already installed item

2017-10-01 Thread tuxic
On 10/01 06:11, Hans de Graaff wrote: > On Sun, 01 Oct 2017 06:25:27 +0200, tuxic wrote: > > >>>> Compiling source in /var/tmp/portage/app-text/ronn-0.7.3-r3/work ... > > * Running compile phase for all ... > > fatal: the 'hpricot' library is required (

[gentoo-user] Compiling ronn: Missing an already installed item

2017-09-30 Thread tuxic
Hi, While trying to install app-text/ronn, I got this interesting problem: ronn misses hpricot, which was installed in beforehand. (The '=' are added by me) Does anyone else installed ronn successfully ? How can I acchieve this? Thanks a lot for any help in advance! Cheers M

Re: [gentoo-user] Udev trouble: Non working rule...or...

2017-09-28 Thread tuxic
On 09/28 05:56, Mateusz Lenik wrote: > On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 07:39:58PM +0200, tu...@posteo.de wrote: > > The interesting thing is: I have a pololu avr programmer (v20, an > > ISP-programmer it is), which uses also /dev/ttyACM...and that > > one works fine. I plugged it in simultanously to ensure

Re: [gentoo-user] Udev trouble: Non working rule...or...

2017-09-28 Thread tuxic
On 09/28 05:03, Mateusz Lenik wrote: > On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 05:03:14PM +0200, tu...@posteo.de wrote: > > I have one of these: > > > > Bus 006 Device 018: ID 16d0:0753 MCS Digistump DigiSpark > > > > ... snip ... > > > > SUBSYSTEMS=="usb", ATTRS{idVendor}=="16d0", ATTRS{idProduct}=="0753", > > M

[gentoo-user] Re: Udev trouble: Non working rule...or...

2017-09-28 Thread tuxic
Sorry, forgot the link...here it is: http://digistump.com/products/1 On 09/28 03:03, tu...@posteo.de wrote: > Hi, > > may bet this is part of the theory about the relationship > between the forest and the trees...I am trying this already > for a longer time. > > I have one of these: > > >

[gentoo-user] Udev trouble: Non working rule...or...

2017-09-28 Thread tuxic
Hi, may bet this is part of the theory about the relationship between the forest and the trees...I am trying this already for a longer time. I have one of these: When plugged in, lsusb reports those as: Bus 006 Device 018: ID 16d0:0753 MCS Digistump DigiSpark and in the verbose form: Bus 006

[gentoo-user] Masked by unknown ?

2017-09-26 Thread tuxic
Hi, while updateing I got this: These are the packages that would be merged, in reverse order: Calculating dependencies... done! Total: 0 packages, Size of downloads: 0 KiB !!! The following update has been skipped due to unsatisfied dependencies: dev-libs/boost:0 sel

Re: [gentoo-user] Need help to compile a minimal wine

2017-09-24 Thread tuxic
On 09/23 06:39, R0b0t1 wrote: > On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 1:21 PM, wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I want to compile wine to execute a single commandline tool. > > That's it. > > > > The commandline tool is the AVR-assembler made by ATmel to recompile > > a FORTH interpreter for the AVR-line of microcontrol

[gentoo-user] Need help to compile a minimal wine

2017-09-23 Thread tuxic
Hi, I want to compile wine to execute a single commandline tool. That's it. The commandline tool is the AVR-assembler made by ATmel to recompile a FORTH interpreter for the AVR-line of microcontrollers of ATMEL/Micorchip: avrasm2.exe: PE32 executable (console) Intel 80386, for MS Windows Most G

[gentoo-user] Searching something like a merge between gnu-screen and cutecom...

2017-09-17 Thread tuxic
Hi, this is complicate for me to explain...let' try it nvertheless ;) I am experimenting with FORTH (punyforth) on an ESP8266. FORTH has a REPL, which -- especially in the beginning -- is very helpful to try things out. With cutecom I can connect to the ESP8266 and get a response. Unfortunately

Re: [gentoo-user] x11-misc/slop: strict_multilib ?

2017-09-13 Thread tuxic
On 09/14 03:17, Sam Jorna wrote: > On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 05:10:47AM +0200, tu...@posteo.de wrote: > > Hi, > > > > while updateing maim/slop I got an error for slop: > > > > > > > Files matching a file type that is not allowed: > >usr/lib/libslopy.so > > * ERROR: x11-misc/slop-6.3.46::ge

[gentoo-user] x11-misc/slop: strict_multilib ?

2017-09-13 Thread tuxic
Hi, while updateing maim/slop I got an error for slop: >>> Install slop-6.3.46 into /var/tmp/portage/x11-misc/slop-6.3.46/image/ >>> category x11-misc >>> Working in BUILD_DIR: >>> "/var/tmp/portage/x11-misc/slop-6.3.46/work/slop-6.3.46_build" make -j6 install [ 87%] Built target slopy [100%] B

Re: [gentoo-user] Downgrading glibc prevented by emerge/portage...but why initiated?

2017-09-12 Thread tuxic
On 09/12 04:52, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: > > I masked =sys-libs/glibc-2.25-r4. > > > > And now I remember why I did this: It gave a compilation error: > > (As some other packages) it has problems with my texinfo installation > > as it seems. > > > > bug number? > > > -- > Andreas K. Hüttel >

Re: [gentoo-user] Downgrading glibc prevented by emerge/portage...but why initiated?

2017-09-12 Thread tuxic
On 09/12 04:50, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: > Am Dienstag, 12. September 2017, 05:43:59 CEST schrieb tu...@posteo.de: > > Hi, > > > > got a problem this morning: > > >>> Verifying ebuild manifests > > >>> Running pre-merge checks for sys-libs/glibc-2.24-r4 > > > > * Sanity check to keep you from b

Re: [gentoo-user] Downgrading glibc prevented by emerge/portage...but why initiated?

2017-09-12 Thread tuxic
Hi, WRONG! :) :) :) I did something different, but it was the same amount of "wrong". I masked =sys-libs/glibc-2.25-r4. And now I remember why I did this: It gave a compilation error: (As some other packages) it has problems with my texinfo installation as it seems. As suggested I run perl-cle

[gentoo-user] Downgrading glibc prevented by emerge/portage...but why initiated?

2017-09-11 Thread tuxic
Hi, got a problem this morning: >>> Verifying ebuild manifests >>> Running pre-merge checks for sys-libs/glibc-2.24-r4 * Sanity check to keep you from breaking your system: * Downgrading glibc is not supported and a sure way to destruction * ERROR: sys-libs/glibc-2.24-r4::gentoo failed (prete

Re: [gentoo-user] USBasp recognized/not recognized...what?

2017-08-30 Thread tuxic
Hi, ok, I fixed it myself...an udev-rule was missing a '"'... (and I am missing a coffee...) Sorry for the false alert...! Cheers Meino On 08/30 03:59, tu...@posteo.de wrote: > Hi, > > for some third party USBasp (ISP flash programmer) clones I got > some dubious situation: > > These device

[gentoo-user] USBasp recognized/not recognized...what?

2017-08-30 Thread tuxic
Hi, for some third party USBasp (ISP flash programmer) clones I got some dubious situation: These devices mainly consists of an ATmega 8A AU, which USB ports connect to a USB connector and smoe GPIOs are used to flash an attached microcontroller via ISP. That's the theory. Now I attach such a d

[gentoo-user] Compiling full featured doxygen...replacing CLisp

2017-08-19 Thread tuxic
Hi, For a test to create all documentation for the LUFA library (USB/Arduino: http://fourwalledcubicle.com/LUFA.php) with doxygen, I enabled all USE-flags for that package and start compiling. One package failed to build: CLisp. But I have working installation of sbcl installed, which is as to my

Re: [gentoo-user] USB device (ATtiny86 w. mcronucleus bootloader) not recognized ?

2017-08-07 Thread tuxic
On 08/07 11:21, Stefan Mark wrote: > On Sun, 6 Aug 2017 18:50:07 +0200 > tu...@posteo.de wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > sorry, this will become a little longish... > > > > Background: To program an ATMEL ATtiny85 via USB > > without a dedicated USB chip there is a bootloader > > called "micornucleys",

Re: [gentoo-user] USB device (ATtiny86 w. mcronucleus bootloader) not recognized ?

2017-08-07 Thread tuxic
On 08/07 08:48, R0b0t1 wrote: > On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 4:29 AM, Stefan Mark wrote: > > On Sun, 6 Aug 2017 19:04:09 -0500 > > R0b0t1 wrote: > > > >> On Sun, Aug 6, 2017 at 11:50 AM, wrote: > >> > When I plug in such a little board into my PC, demesg > >> > reports: > >> > [ 1429.834140] usb 7-4:

Re: [gentoo-user] USB device (ATtiny86 w. mcronucleus bootloader) not recognized ?

2017-08-07 Thread tuxic
On 08/07 11:29, Stefan Mark wrote: > On Sun, 6 Aug 2017 19:04:09 -0500 > R0b0t1 wrote: > > > On Sun, Aug 6, 2017 at 11:50 AM, wrote: > > > When I plug in such a little board into my PC, demesg > > > reports: > > > [ 1429.834140] usb 7-4: new low-speed USB device number 15 using > > > ohci-pci [

Re: [gentoo-user] USB device (ATtiny86 w. mcronucleus bootloader) not recognized ?

2017-08-07 Thread tuxic
Hi, On 08/06 07:04, R0b0t1 wrote: > On Sun, Aug 6, 2017 at 11:50 AM, wrote: > > When I plug in such a little board into my PC, demesg > > reports: > > [ 1429.834140] usb 7-4: new low-speed USB device number 15 using ohci-pci > > [ 1429.965142] usb 7-4: device descriptor read/64, error -62 > > [

[gentoo-user] USB device (ATtiny86 w. mcronucleus bootloader) not recognized ?

2017-08-06 Thread tuxic
Hi, sorry, this will become a little longish... Background: To program an ATMEL ATtiny85 via USB without a dedicated USB chip there is a bootloader called "micornucleys", which bitbangs the USB protocoll. This mechanism is used in Digistupms Digispark ATTtiny developmnent board (http://digistump.

[gentoo-user] Wanting gcc-avr...getting trouble... :)

2017-08-03 Thread tuxic
Hi, I want a avr toolchain. >From here https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Arduino I took instructions but already the first step fail: emerge -pvv cross-avr/gcc cross-avr/binutils cross-avr/avr-libc # emerge -pvv cross-avr/gcc cross-avr/binutils cross-avr/avr-libc These are the packages that would be

[gentoo-user] maim screenshooting

2017-07-30 Thread tuxic
Hi, I am shootin around the screen...experimenting... >From here: https://github.com/naelstrof/maim I found this: "This is a basic, but useful command that simply screenshots the current active window. $ maim -i $(xdotool getactivewindow) ~/mypicture.jpg " Giving this via command

Re:[SOLVED] [gentoo-user] Clickless screenshot...how?

2017-07-29 Thread tuxic
On 07/29 07:17, Mart Raudsepp wrote: > Ühel kenal päeval, L, 29.07.2017 kell 13:20, kirjutas tu...@posteo.de: > > The task is already accomplished :) with a mixture of WM-based > > hotkey definitions and a delayed commandline utility (main,scrot, > > imagemagick). > > Addtionally I dont think that

Re: [gentoo-user] Clickless screenshot...how?

2017-07-29 Thread tuxic
On 07/29 06:52, Bill Kenworthy wrote: > On 29/07/17 18:05, v...@ukr.net wrote: > > On Sat, 29 Jul 2017 10:58:50 +0200 > > tu...@posteo.de wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> to display tracking informations (abondomed delivery) to an oversea > >> seller I need to screenshot a dropdown menu. > > Can you

Re: [gentoo-user] Clickless screenshot...how?

2017-07-29 Thread tuxic
On 07/29 01:05, v...@ukr.net wrote: > On Sat, 29 Jul 2017 10:58:50 +0200 > tu...@posteo.de wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > to display tracking informations (abondomed delivery) to an oversea > > seller I need to screenshot a dropdown menu. > > Unfortunately this dropdown menu only drops down when touche

Re: [gentoo-user] Clickless screenshot...how?

2017-07-29 Thread tuxic
On 07/29 11:09, Dan Johansson wrote: > On 29.07.2017 10:58, tu...@posteo.de wrote: > > to display tracking informations (abondomed delivery) to an oversea > > seller I need to screenshot a dropdown menu. > > Unfortunately this dropdown menu only drops down when touched with > > the mouse pointer.

[gentoo-user] Clickless screenshot...how?

2017-07-29 Thread tuxic
Hi, to display tracking informations (abondomed delivery) to an oversea seller I need to screenshot a dropdown menu. Unfortunately this dropdown menu only drops down when touched with the mouse pointer. This in turn prohibis any other action with the mourse (changeing the window for example). The

Re: [gentoo-user] Struggling with CH340 serial<=>USB converter (Arduino related)

2017-07-25 Thread tuxic
On 07/26 03:50, tu...@posteo.de wrote: > On 07/25 02:24, R0b0t1 wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 12:17 PM, wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > (yes, I also have a FTDI USB<=>serial adapter...in this case I need to > > > get my CH340 based work) > > > > > > this drives me crazy... > > > > > > My CH340G

Re: [gentoo-user] Struggling with CH340 serial<=>USB converter (Arduino related)

2017-07-25 Thread tuxic
On 07/25 02:24, R0b0t1 wrote: > On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 12:17 PM, wrote: > > Hi, > > > > (yes, I also have a FTDI USB<=>serial adapter...in this case I need to > > get my CH340 based work) > > > > this drives me crazy... > > > > My CH340G USB<=>serial adaptor is recognized as > > (lsusb) > > Bus

[gentoo-user] Struggling with CH340 serial<=>USB converter (Arduino related)

2017-07-25 Thread tuxic
Hi, (yes, I also have a FTDI USB<=>serial adapter...in this case I need to get my CH340 based work) this drives me crazy... My CH340G USB<=>serial adaptor is recognized as (lsusb) Bus 007 Device 011: ID 1a86:7523 QinHeng Electronics HL-340 USB-Serial adapter (dmesg) [52255.016438] usb 7-4: new f

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [OT] Small and dirty 32 bit environment just to flash my Bus Pirate

2017-07-19 Thread tuxic
On 07/20 04:51, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > On 19/07/17 19:57, tu...@posteo.de wrote: > > Hi, > > > > My Buspirate v36a needs a newer firmware. > > Unfortunately the flasher software is only > > available in 32bit and I run a 64bit modern > > Gentoo. > > Is this the tool? > > https://github.com/D

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [OT] Small and dirty 32 bit environment just to flash my Bus Pirate

2017-07-19 Thread tuxic
On 07/20 04:51, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > On 19/07/17 19:57, tu...@posteo.de wrote: > > Hi, > > > > My Buspirate v36a needs a newer firmware. > > Unfortunately the flasher software is only > > available in 32bit and I run a 64bit modern > > Gentoo. > > Is this the tool? > > https://github.com/D

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [OT] Small and dirty 32 bit environment just to flash my Bus Pirate

2017-07-19 Thread tuxic
On 07/19 10:53, Mick wrote: > On Wednesday 19 Jul 2017 21:05:51 Jorge Almeida wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 8:28 PM, wrote: > > > # > > > # Executable file formats / Emulations > > > # > > > CONFIG_BINFMT_ELF=y > > > CONFIG_COMPAT_BINFMT_ELF=y > > > CONFIG_ELFCORE=y > > > CONFIG_CORE_DUMP_DE

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [OT] Small and dirty 32 bit environment just to flash my Bus Pirate

2017-07-19 Thread tuxic
On 07/19 07:51, Jorge Almeida wrote: > On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 7:25 PM, wrote: > > On 07/19 06:57, Jorge Almeida wrote: > >> On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 6:40 PM, wrote: > >> > >> > > >> > the tool is statically linked and only the command "file" > >> > reveals its 32bit nature. > >> > > >> If the t

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [OT] Small and dirty 32 bit environment just to flash my Bus Pirate

2017-07-19 Thread tuxic
On 07/19 06:57, Jorge Almeida wrote: > On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 6:40 PM, wrote: > > > > > the tool is statically linked and only the command "file" > > reveals its 32bit nature. > > > If the tool is a static binary, you shouldn't need anything besides a > kernel with support for 32 bit executable

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [OT] Small and dirty 32 bit environment just to flash my Bus Pirate

2017-07-19 Thread tuxic
On 07/19 08:28, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > On 19/07/17 19:57, tu...@posteo.de wrote: > > Hi, > > > > My Buspirate v36a needs a newer firmware. > > Unfortunately the flasher software is only > > available in 32bit and I run a 64bit modern > > Gentoo. > > By default, Gentoo is multilib. Meaning it

[gentoo-user] [OT] Small and dirty 32 bit environment just to flash my Bus Pirate

2017-07-19 Thread tuxic
Hi, My Buspirate v36a needs a newer firmware. Unfortunately the flasher software is only available in 32bit and I run a 64bit modern Gentoo. The flasher is a commandline tool and needs no fancy movie player or fat surround sound. If there is no way (I fear) to setup a tiny quick'n' dirty 32bit e

Re: [gentoo-user] [OT]: "New to aliexpress" pop up - how to block it?

2017-07-16 Thread tuxic
On 07/16 07:59, Mick wrote: > On Sunday 16 Jul 2017 20:40:17 tu...@posteo.de wrote: > > On 07/16 07:35, Mick wrote: > > > On Sunday 16 Jul 2017 20:08:03 tu...@posteo.de wrote: > > > > PS: > > > > > > > > Found here: > > > > https://gigaom.com/2014/05/11/not-all-ad-blockers-are-the-same-heres-why >

Re: [gentoo-user] [OT]: "New to aliexpress" pop up - how to block it?

2017-07-16 Thread tuxic
On 07/16 07:35, Mick wrote: > On Sunday 16 Jul 2017 20:08:03 tu...@posteo.de wrote: > > > PS: > > > > Found here: > > https://gigaom.com/2014/05/11/not-all-ad-blockers-are-the-same-heres-why-the > > -effs-privacy-badger-is-different/ > > > > "Ghostery makes money by tracking the trackers while b

Re: [gentoo-user] [OT]: "New to aliexpress" pop up - how to block it?

2017-07-16 Thread tuxic
On 07/16 01:05, Dale wrote: > tu...@posteo.de wrote: > > > > Some weeks ago I came accross a site which privacy policy consist of > > one sentence, > > > > "Nothing will be recorded." > > > > That's it. I tend to trust such a lot more than these poems of > > privacy... > > > > But may be I am o

Re: [gentoo-user] [OT]: "New to aliexpress" pop up - how to block it?

2017-07-16 Thread tuxic
On 07/16 08:00, tu...@posteo.de wrote: > On 07/16 02:45, Urs Schütz wrote: > > On 07/16/17 14:08, tu...@posteo.de wrote: > > > On 07/16 01:58, Urs Schütz wrote: > > > > On 07/16/17 05:56, R0b0t1 wrote: > > > > > On Sun, Jul 16, 2017 at 3:44 AM, wrote: > > > > > > On 07/16 03:12, R0b0t1 wrote: > >

Re: [gentoo-user] [OT]: "New to aliexpress" pop up - how to block it?

2017-07-16 Thread tuxic
On 07/16 02:45, Urs Schütz wrote: > On 07/16/17 14:08, tu...@posteo.de wrote: > > On 07/16 01:58, Urs Schütz wrote: > > > On 07/16/17 05:56, R0b0t1 wrote: > > > > On Sun, Jul 16, 2017 at 3:44 AM, wrote: > > > > > On 07/16 03:12, R0b0t1 wrote: > > > > > > On Sun, Jul 16, 2017 at 2:11 AM, wrote:

Re: [gentoo-user] [OT]: "New to aliexpress" pop up - how to block it?

2017-07-16 Thread tuxic
On 07/16 01:58, Urs Schütz wrote: > On 07/16/17 05:56, R0b0t1 wrote: > > On Sun, Jul 16, 2017 at 3:44 AM, wrote: > > > On 07/16 03:12, R0b0t1 wrote: > > > > On Sun, Jul 16, 2017 at 2:11 AM, wrote: > > > > > On 07/16 01:59, R0b0t1 wrote: > > > > > > On Sun, Jul 16, 2017 at 1:47 AM, wrote: > >

Re: [gentoo-user] [OT]: "New to aliexpress" pop up - how to block it?

2017-07-16 Thread tuxic
On 07/16 10:48, tu...@posteo.de wrote: > On 07/16 09:18, Peter Humphrey wrote: > > On Sunday 16 Jul 2017 09:59:54 tu...@posteo.de wrote: > > > On 07/16 08:51, Peter Humphrey wrote: > > > > --->8 > > > > > > Have you tried Ghostery? > > > > > > > > http://www.ghostery.com > > > > > > Hi Peter, >

Re: [gentoo-user] [OT]: "New to aliexpress" pop up - how to block it?

2017-07-16 Thread tuxic
On 07/16 09:18, Peter Humphrey wrote: > On Sunday 16 Jul 2017 09:59:54 tu...@posteo.de wrote: > > On 07/16 08:51, Peter Humphrey wrote: > > --->8 > > > > Have you tried Ghostery? > > > > > > http://www.ghostery.com > > > > Hi Peter, > > > > no, due to this reason: > > > > "Ghostery is owned b

Re: [gentoo-user] [OT]: "New to aliexpress" pop up - how to block it?

2017-07-16 Thread tuxic
On 07/16 03:12, R0b0t1 wrote: > On Sun, Jul 16, 2017 at 2:11 AM, wrote: > > On 07/16 01:59, R0b0t1 wrote: > >> On Sun, Jul 16, 2017 at 1:47 AM, wrote: > >> > Hi, > >> > > >> > that drives my insane: > >> > While searching items for my DIY Nixie clock on aliexpress I get > >> > one certain popup

Re: [gentoo-user] [OT]: "New to aliexpress" pop up - how to block it?

2017-07-16 Thread tuxic
On 07/16 08:51, Peter Humphrey wrote: > On Sunday 16 Jul 2017 08:47:20 tu...@posteo.de wrote: > > Hi, > > > > that drives my insane: > > While searching items for my DIY Nixie clock on aliexpress I get > > one certain popup with each new access to aliexpress asking > > me, whether I am new to alie

[gentoo-user] Any alternativ to "autotrace" which will be removed in a month ?

2017-07-16 Thread tuxic
Hi, is there any alternative to media-gfx/autotrace because autotrace gets removed? Thanks a lot for any help in advance! Cheers Meino

Re: [gentoo-user] [OT]: "New to aliexpress" pop up - how to block it?

2017-07-16 Thread tuxic
On 07/16 01:59, R0b0t1 wrote: > On Sun, Jul 16, 2017 at 1:47 AM, wrote: > > Hi, > > > > that drives my insane: > > While searching items for my DIY Nixie clock on aliexpress I get > > one certain popup with each new access to aliexpress asking > > me, whether I am new to aliexpress and offers me

[gentoo-user] perl-cleaner oddities

2017-07-16 Thread tuxic
Hi, Again I have problems with screen and lynx to build based on some texinfo related reason. I learned from posting, that the real culprit is perl here and I have to run perl-cleaner --all for this to go away. Recentlu a perl update appears and I run perl-cleaner afterwards. But regardless how o

[gentoo-user] [OT]: "New to aliexpress" pop up - how to block it?

2017-07-15 Thread tuxic
Hi, that drives my insane: While searching items for my DIY Nixie clock on aliexpress I get one certain popup with each new access to aliexpress asking me, whether I am new to aliexpress and offers me a coupon. I have no othe chance than clicking on this [beep] pop up to be able to see the page c

Re: [gentoo-user] ...again compile problems due to texinfo...

2017-06-29 Thread tuxic
On 06/29 08:01, Marc Joliet wrote: > Just out of curiosity, but did you try with an older version of screen? > Looking at the error messages from texinfo I can't help but wonder > whether it's not screen that's at fault here. > > Greetings > -- > Marc Joliet > -- > "People who think they know

Re: [gentoo-user] ...again compile problems due to texinfo...

2017-06-29 Thread tuxic
On 06/29 12:24, Mike Gilbert wrote: > On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 10:06 PM, wrote: > > Hi, > > > > previously the compilation of glibc failed, because docs > > cpuld not be build. > > This was caused in the context of texinfo. > > "Solved" was this by not building the docs via > > deinstallation of t

[gentoo-user] ...again compile problems due to texinfo...

2017-06-28 Thread tuxic
Hi, previously the compilation of glibc failed, because docs cpuld not be build. This was caused in the context of texinfo. "Solved" was this by not building the docs via deinstallation of texinfo temporarily. No screen jumps over the edge and again texinfo seems to cause this: >>> Source config

Re: [gentoo-user] Copy'n'Paste...but not for all?

2017-06-28 Thread tuxic
On 06/26 05:14, Nils Freydank wrote: > Hi, > > Am Sonntag, 25. Juni 2017, 20:12:38 CEST schrieb tu...@posteo.de: > > [...] > > > > Looks a little weird to me... > > Is that an error, which fails to fail completly > > or is a half working feature (or do I fail > > in both cases ... ;) ? > > all t

[gentoo-user] Copy'n'Paste...but not for all?

2017-06-25 Thread tuxic
Hi, On my Gentoo Linux box I am running Virtualbox and on that virtual box Linux again. When trying to cut text from a terminal or another text-based apolication and past that into a firefox running on the virtualized Linux it fails. But when I start a firefox on the host system, cut text from

Re: [gentoo-user] glibc-2.24-r2 failed (install phase)

2017-06-21 Thread tuxic
On 06/21 01:49, Mike Gilbert wrote: > On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 1:10 PM, wrote: > > On 06/21 05:38, Alexander Kapshuk wrote: > >> On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 7:43 PM, wrote: > >> > On 06/19 11:55, Alexander Kapshuk wrote: > >> >> On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 6:21 AM, wrote: > >> >> > On 06/15 05:56, tu.

Re: [gentoo-user] glibc-2.24-r2 failed (install phase)

2017-06-21 Thread tuxic
On 06/21 05:38, Alexander Kapshuk wrote: > On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 7:43 PM, wrote: > > On 06/19 11:55, Alexander Kapshuk wrote: > >> On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 6:21 AM, wrote: > >> > On 06/15 05:56, tu...@posteo.de wrote: > >> >> Hi, > >> >> > >> >> While updateing glibc-2.24-r2 failed to install.

Re: [gentoo-user] glibc-2.24-r2 failed (install phase)

2017-06-19 Thread tuxic
On 06/19 11:55, Alexander Kapshuk wrote: > On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 6:21 AM, wrote: > > On 06/15 05:56, tu...@posteo.de wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> While updateing glibc-2.24-r2 failed to install. > >> > >> These are the last few lines of that process: > >> > >> > >> al/execinfo.c.texi > >> /v

Re: [gentoo-user] glibc-2.24-r2 failed (install phase)

2017-06-18 Thread tuxic
On 06/15 05:56, tu...@posteo.de wrote: > Hi, > > While updateing glibc-2.24-r2 failed to install. > > These are the last few lines of that process: > > > al/execinfo.c.texi > /var/tmp/portage/sys-libs/glibc-2.24-r2/work/build-amd64-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-nptl/manual/add.c.texi > > /var/tmp/

Re: [gentoo-user] glibc-2.24-r2 failed (install phase)

2017-06-17 Thread tuxic
On 06/16 08:45, Spackman, Chris wrote: > On 2017/06/16 at 09:55am, Mick wrote: > > On Friday 16 Jun 2017 04:05:17 tu...@posteo.de wrote: > > > On 06/15 08:18, tu...@posteo.de wrote: > > > > On 06/15 12:16, Mike Gilbert wrote: > > > > > On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 11:56 AM, wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > >

Re: [gentoo-user] glibc-2.24-r2 failed (install phase)

2017-06-15 Thread tuxic
On 06/15 08:18, tu...@posteo.de wrote: > On 06/15 12:16, Mike Gilbert wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 11:56 AM, wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > While updateing glibc-2.24-r2 failed to install. > > > > > > These are the last few lines of that process: > > > > > > > > > al/execinfo.c.texi > >

Re: [gentoo-user] glibc-2.24-r2 failed (install phase)

2017-06-15 Thread tuxic
On 06/15 12:16, Mike Gilbert wrote: > On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 11:56 AM, wrote: > > Hi, > > > > While updateing glibc-2.24-r2 failed to install. > > > > These are the last few lines of that process: > > > > > > al/execinfo.c.texi > > /var/tmp/portage/sys-libs/glibc-2.24-r2/work/build-amd64-x

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   >