Florian Philipp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I guess it would be harmless to just run the `make modules_intall' part
>> again and catch a list.
>>
>
> I think you search for "modprobe -l" :)
Wow... and egad, look at this:
modprobe -l|wc -l
945
That is a kernel built with genkernel
--
g
On Sun, 2008-01-06 at 17:15 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Florian Philipp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> There's a reason for the existence of genkernel - it's so that you don't
> >> have to go through all this pain and suffering, and can instead remove
> >> stuff a bit at a time with r
Florian Philipp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> There's a reason for the existence of genkernel - it's so that you don't
>> have to go through all this pain and suffering, and can instead remove
>> stuff a bit at a time with reasonable confidence it won;t blow up in
>> your face :-)
>>
>
> Ther
On Sun, 6 Jan 2008 10:58:12 +0400
Yahya Mohammad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Just to know more on this... Is there really any reason to worry
> > > about kernel size... I mean in most cases with a standard desktop
> > > install?
> > >
> >
> > yes. Bigger kernel = more cpu cache used up = slo
On Sunday 06 January 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Erik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] skrev:
> >> Then you are stuck figuring out what on earth a hypervisor is.
> >
> > Alt+F2
> > wp:hypervisor
> > ENTER
>
> Hey thats a pretty neat trick. Now if I wondered if that would be
>
On Sunday 06 January 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> People in this thread speak of 2 and 3 boots and editing in between
> in the same message where `5 minutes' is mentioned. That doesn't
> wash. You're way past that time frame. But still not in the guiness
> book realm I guess... hehe.
I guess
> > Just to know more on this... Is there really any reason to worry about
> > kernel size... I mean in most cases with a standard desktop install?
> >
>
> yes. Bigger kernel = more cpu cache used up = slower system.
Does all of the kernel reside in cpu cache all the time? Or can parts
of it get
On Sonntag, 6. Januar 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Saturday 05 January 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >> > to de-junk a default config - even if you don't know what you do,
> >> > is in realm of half an hour to an hour. If you read everything.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>> Like I said in an earlier mail,
>
> Do you mean on this thread? If so I must have some trouble with my
> newsreader threading or something... I don't see it here.
Haa I see it now... and it looks like I brought up exactly some of
what you covered there (scsi). Inte
Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Saturday 05 January 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> > to de-junk a default config - even if you don't know what you do,
>> > is in realm of half an hour to an hour. If you read everything.
>>
>> Do you have a de-junked .config that I can diff agains
Erik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] skrev:
>> Then you are stuck figuring out what on earth a hypervisor is.
>>
> Alt+F2
> wp:hypervisor
> ENTER
Hey thats a pretty neat trick. Now if I wondered if that would be
important since I plan to run a vmware application... I will take
[EMAIL PROTECTED] skrev:
> Then you are stuck figuring out what on earth a hypervisor is.
>
Alt+F2
wp:hypervisor
ENTER
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
On Saturday 05 January 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > to de-junk a default config - even if you don't know what you do,
> > is in realm of half an hour to an hour. If you read everything.
>
> Do you have a de-junked .config that I can diff against the
> default.. it would be a way to see what k
"Hemmann, Volker Armin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I think this is heading in direction different from what I intended.
You seem to be arguing that it can be done quickly... I don't disagree
with you. If like you say you mostly follow what ever is default
unless you know what you are doing. Bu
On Samstag, 5. Januar 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> "Hemmann, Volker Armin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Samstag, 5. Januar 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > you want to read this:
> > http://www.kroah.com/lkn/
>
> Thanks... I'm getting started now.
>
> > configuring a kernel is a mat
"Hemmann, Volker Armin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Samstag, 5. Januar 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> you want to read this:
> http://www.kroah.com/lkn/
Thanks... I'm getting started now.
> configuring a kernel is a matter of minutes. And seconds, if you just copy
> over the old config
16 matches
Mail list logo
