On Sunday 14 June 2009 19:38:42 Harry Putnam wrote:
Sebastian Günther sam...@guenther-roetgen.de writes:
* Harry Putnam (rea...@newsguy.com) [12.06.09 16:41]:
There is a patch offered but still one would think using standard
emerge on a package that is outside the `~' daredevil stage and is
On 15 Jun 2009, at 08:34, Alan McKinnon wrote:
...
Much more work than it's worth. It's easier to reinstall.
...
There was a recent thread on this, and the OP eventually decided to
write a
script that listed every package he had and copy this to
package.mask (with
in front of course), then
On Monday 15 June 2009 18:50:58 Stroller wrote:
On 15 Jun 2009, at 08:34, Alan McKinnon wrote:
...
Much more work than it's worth. It's easier to reinstall.
...
There was a recent thread on this, and the OP eventually decided to
write a
script that listed every package he had and copy
Sebastian Günther sam...@guenther-roetgen.de writes:
* Harry Putnam (rea...@newsguy.com) [12.06.09 16:41]:
There is a patch offered but still one would think using standard
emerge on a package that is outside the `~' daredevil stage and is not
masked, it should `just work' [tm].
When
Sebastian Günther sam...@guenther-roetgen.de writes:
* Harry Putnam (rea...@newsguy.com) [12.06.09 16:41]:
There is a patch offered but still one would think using standard
emerge on a package that is outside the `~' daredevil stage and is not
masked, it should `just work' [tm].
When
* Harry Putnam (rea...@newsguy.com) [14.06.09 19:46]:
Sebastian Günther sam...@guenther-roetgen.de writes:
* Harry Putnam (rea...@newsguy.com) [12.06.09 16:41]:
There is a patch offered but still one would think using standard
emerge on a package that is outside the `~' daredevil stage
Sebastian Günther sam...@guenther-roetgen.de writes:
First of all the bug is fixed, and a working patch was there 1 day after
the opening. I call this a fast response...
For ~x86 this is a working solution, and if you use ~x86: b.g.o *is* the
users information system and applying patches
7 matches
Mail list logo
