Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Error starting Konq after update world

2006-11-08 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Tue, 07 Nov 2006 21:55:55 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes, meaningless; update world means the packages on YOUR machine, matching YOUR arch and dependencies requires by YOUR use flags have been changed. No one can relate to that without knowing all those settings, or a simple list

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Error starting Konq after update world

2006-11-08 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Wednesday 08 November 2006 04:55, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Neil Bothwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [...] I'd hoped someone would have had the same or similar situation and error before posted piles of data... so no not meaningless. Yes, meaningless; update world means the packages on

[gentoo-user] Re: Error starting Konq after update world

2006-11-08 Thread reader
Neil Bothwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: No it doesn't. It updates whatever has been updated since you last ran it. This depends on the arch and USE flags you have, which packages you have installed and when you last did it. it could update two packages or two hundred. The point is, the

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Error starting Konq after update world

2006-11-08 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Wed, 08 Nov 2006 06:01:52 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is getting silly, and all because I tried to help you. Maybe there's a lesson to be learned. Here is meaningless: Konqueror errored out with this message bla bla. What does it mean? What I gave was considerably more.

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Error starting Konq after update world

2006-11-08 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Wednesday 08 November 2006 14:01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No it doesn't. It updates whatever has been updated since you last ran it. This depends on the arch and USE flags you have, which packages you have installed and when you last did it. it could update two packages or two hundred.

[gentoo-user] Re: Error starting Konq after update world

2006-11-08 Thread reader
Neil Bothwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [...] OK OK folks .. moving on now... Grow up! I'm a little old for that at nearing 70 but it can be embarrassing how some minor or even imagined infraction can nettle way out of proportion to any sensible take on the situation. Why? You have

[gentoo-user] Re: Error starting Konq after update world

2006-11-07 Thread reader
For Andrey: CFLAGS=-O2 -march=i686 -pipe Neil Bothwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Tue, 07 Nov 2006 09:26:07 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Attempting to start konqueror following an `update world' This is a meaning less statement, all you're saying is I upgraded some packages, but I'm

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Error starting Konq after update world

2006-11-07 Thread Andrey
On Tuesday 07 November 2006 17:55, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Checking it out with emerge -vp konqueror I see the basic problem but not really understanding what it means: [blocks B ] =kde-base/kdebase-3.5* (is blocking kde-base/kcontrol-3.5.5, kde-base/libkonq-3.5.5,

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Error starting Konq after update world

2006-11-07 Thread Hemmann, Volker Armin
So you used the monolithic ebuilds. Just re-emerge kdebase. Don't do anything else. After that: revdep-rebuilt. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Error starting Konq after update world

2006-11-07 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Tue, 07 Nov 2006 11:55:12 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Attempting to start konqueror following an `update world' This is a meaningless statement, all you're saying is I upgraded some packages, but I'm not telling you what they were. We'd need to know which packages were updated

[gentoo-user] Re: Error starting Konq after update world

2006-11-07 Thread reader
Neil Bothwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [...] I'd hoped someone would have had the same or similar situation and error before posted piles of data... so no not meaningless. Yes, meaningless; update world means the packages on YOUR machine, matching YOUR arch and dependencies requires by

[gentoo-user] Re: Error starting Konq after update world

2006-11-07 Thread reader
Richard Fish [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On 11/7/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There was an error loading the module KHTML. The diagnostics is: /usr/kde/3.5/lib/libkhtml.so.4: undefined symbol: _ZN14KURIFilterData6reinitERK7QString This looks suspiciously like the kind