2008/12/14 James :
> should have said "profiler"
> Breaking down algorithms and make a fundamentally better
> algo for a gpu, will require a really good "profiler" to
> imho.
So far I'd be happy at being able to run something and leave the
evaluation of gains at a theoretical level.
>> Anyway, it
Miguel Ramos <2008 miguel.ramos.name> writes:
> > http://techreport.com/discussions.x/15886
> > I sure hope we get at least a function level profile
> > that works with gcc with Catalyst 8.12.
should have said "profiler"
Breaking down algorithms and make a fundamentally better
algo for a gpu,
Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Friday 12 December 2008 01:24:27 Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
[...]
Then did the above command. All it did was creating a file
autounmask-xorg-server with this inside:
# ---
# BEGIN: x11-base/xorg-server-1.5.3
# ---
=x11-base/xorg-server-1.5.3 ~amd64
# ---
# END
On Friday 12 December 2008 01:24:27 Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> Neil Bothwick wrote:
> > On Thu, 11 Dec 2008 22:16:59 +, Miguel Ramos wrote:
> >> I did put the lengthly list of files in package.keywords with ~amd64,
> >> but I'm not sure this is the beast approach in the long run.
> >
> > Make /
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Thu, 11 Dec 2008 22:16:59 +, Miguel Ramos wrote:
I did put the lengthly list of files in package.keywords with ~amd64,
but I'm not sure this is the beast approach in the long run.
Make /etc/portage/package.keywords a directory, then run
autounmask x11-base/xorg-se
2008/12/11 Nikos Chantziaras :
> Same here, plus that switching to VTs and back to X a couple of times hangs
> the machine. That's has always the case with fglrx, with any version ever
> produced, on any distro you can imagine.
Oh, I can't believe!
I'm almost sure at some point this afternoon I g
Miguel Ramos wrote:
2008/12/11 Volker Armin Hemmann :
But the result isn't very good. I have the following behaviour
consistently: boot system, X starts fine, I close X on purpose, second
time X doesn't start, receives signal 11, third time on starting X my
system hangs badly and I have to press
2008/12/11 James :
> Did you see this?
>
> http://techreport.com/discussions.x/15886
>
> I sure hope we get at least a function level profile
> that works with gcc with Catalyst 8.12.
>
>
> I await your respone.
I took a look at your link but I can't see what I was expected to see.
Anyway, it see
Miguel Ramos <2008 miguel.ramos.name> writes:
> Thanks for the info.
> It really looks like the 8.12 is more recent than the 8.54.3 after all...
> I'm going to try to install this one and I'll get back to you.
> As to GPU programming, I'm certainly there too!
> However, there is another obstacle
2008/12/11 James <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> "ATI Stream Computing Support"
>
> It seems that with ATI Catalyst 8.12, we commoners can
> finally access and program so that the GPU is another
> available processor for us to access and use.
>
>
> Anyone with information, particularly relate to 'howto'
>
Miguel Ramos <2008 miguel.ramos.name> writes:
> I'm new to these lists.
> I have just come up with an ebuild for the most recent ATI driver for
> FirePro/FireGL chips.
> Previous ebuilds didn't work due to problems compiling fgl_glxgears;
> so this one is better because it solves these issues an
11 matches
Mail list logo
