quoth the kashani:
> darren kirby wrote:
> > quoth the Sven Köhler:
> >>> It does not read /etc/syslog.conf, it
> >>> reads /etc/syslog-ng/syslog-ng.conf for it's configuration. Chances are
> >>> the default is to send most everything to messages
> >>
> >> Yes, that's the default.
> >>
> >> And act
quoth the Sven Köhler:
> > It does not read /etc/syslog.conf, it
> > reads /etc/syslog-ng/syslog-ng.conf for it's configuration. Chances are
> > the default is to send most everything to messages
>
> Yes, that's the default.
>
> And actually, i don't want to configure all my machines. I would prefe
Sven Köhler wrote:
> But i guess, they have a more suitable default setting. Everything going
> to /var/log/messes is just to simple, i think. Actually i don't want the
> layout to be like sysklogd. But i would like a little more complicated
> default setting.
Okay, in that case, I'll say that me
http://gentoo-wiki.com/Syslog-ng
Is that kind of conf (described in Quick Start section) far away from
what you are looking for ?
Gal'
2007/5/30, Sven Köhler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I am curious, though: If you like the sysklogd
> layout to the point that you want to replicate it exactly in other
I am curious, though: If you like the sysklogd
> layout to the point that you want to replicate it exactly in other log
> daemons, why do you want to switch log daemons?
Last sysklogd version if from 2001.
And portage contains 1.4.2_pre2007* versions. This was curious to me.
And on the other hand
Sven Köhler wrote:
> So the next thing i could try is metalog.
>
> Does it have a nice default config?
I think so, but I did modify it to better suit my needs. It doesn't need
logrotate, which IMHO is a big plus, and I find its filters much easier to
set up than syslog-ng's. I am curious, though:
6 matches
Mail list logo
