On Sat, July 4, 2009 22:54, Willie Wong wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 04, 2009 at 04:22:59AM +0200, Penguin Lover Jes?s Guerrero
> squawked:
>
>>
>> On Sat, July 4, 2009 03:58, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
>>
>>> On Samstag 04 Juli 2009, Jes?s Guerrero wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I don't filter anything. Just de
On Sat, Jul 04, 2009 at 04:22:59AM +0200, Penguin Lover Jes?s Guerrero squawked:
>
> On Sat, July 4, 2009 03:58, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> > On Samstag 04 Juli 2009, Jes?s Guerrero wrote:
> >
> >
> > I don't filter anything. Just default metalog with default settings.
>
> I use sysklogd, that
On Samstag 04 Juli 2009, Jesús Guerrero wrote:
> On Sat, July 4, 2009 03:58, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> > On Samstag 04 Juli 2009, Jesús Guerrero wrote:
> >
> >
> > I don't filter anything. Just default metalog with default settings.
>
> I use sysklogd, that shouldn't matter much though. The con
On Sat, July 4, 2009 03:58, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> On Samstag 04 Juli 2009, Jesús Guerrero wrote:
>
>
> I don't filter anything. Just default metalog with default settings.
I use sysklogd, that shouldn't matter much though. The config is pretty
standard, and certainly there's nothing relat
On Samstag 04 Juli 2009, Jesús Guerrero wrote:
>
> > And please - the open ones aren't that bad. When did
> > you try them the last time?
>
> Some days ago. During months for now.
me too - with 2.6.30 and everything. 2d was very good, better than vesa. 3d
does not work - of course. The only reas
Gentelmen,
there's no need for a flame war;
for some it's stable for others it's not, hence the reason it's still in
development.
Regards,
Hazen.
2009/7/3 Jesús Guerrero
>
> On Sat, July 4, 2009 03:17, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> > On Freitag 03 Juli 2009, Jesús Guerrero wrote:
> >
> >> If
On Sat, July 4, 2009 03:17, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> On Freitag 03 Juli 2009, Jesús Guerrero wrote:
>
>> If I have to choose between one closed driver that works perfectly and
>> one close driver that works bad+2 open ones that simply don't work, I
>> choose the closed driver that works.
>
>
On Freitag 03 Juli 2009, Jesús Guerrero wrote:
> On Fri, July 3, 2009 20:30, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> > Well, AMD uses a fixed cycle - one release a month. They also have a
> > fixed development cycle that takes roughly 3 month (all explained on
> > phoronix a long time ago). So supporting the
On Fri, July 3, 2009 21:56, Sebastian Beßler wrote:
> Jesús Guerrero schrieb:
>
>
>> I really advice to stay in .28 if you are going to use fglrx.
>>
>
> That is exactly what the ebuild says after building with a kernel >2.6.28
>
>
> "Kernels newer then 2.6.28 are heavily patched and might result
On Fri, July 3, 2009 20:30, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> Well, AMD uses a fixed cycle - one release a month. They also have a
> fixed development cycle that takes roughly 3 month (all explained on
> phoronix a long time ago). So supporting the latest kernels is not easy or
> even possible.
Very
Well, AMD uses a fixed cycle - one release a month. They also have a fixed
development cycle that takes roughly 3 month (all explained on phoronix a long
time ago). So supporting the latest kernels is not easy or even possible.
They also only support a few distros. If you insist on using a non-s
I was reffering to the fact that ATI has a history of support issues within
Linux.
As for "Understanding" all I know is emerge ati-drivers where my keywords
file contains all the nifty means to unmask the packages & dependencies I
need still results in an unusable X. (which is why it's been revere
On Freitag 03 Juli 2009, Hazen Valliant-Saunders wrote:
>
> No really the ATI installer does not work!? Go figure.
>
you really do not understand. It is not a matter of 'does it work' or not. The
installer dumps a couple of files into the system - and on a gentoo system in
all the wrong places
No really the ATI installer does not work!? Go figure.
It's a clean & fresh install (habbit of mine)
I had to unmask a few packages but there were no kernel patches so..
Due to the miserable failure I'll wait some more.
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 3:36 AM, Volker Armin Hemmann <
volkerar...@googlem
On Freitag 03 Juli 2009, Adam Carter wrote:
> > So any news on the ATI Front or will I have to rool my own and submit it?
>
> Add "x11-drivers/ati-drivers ~x86" (or ~amd64) to
> /etc/portage/package.keywords and you will be able to install 9.6.
>
> It now appears to be asking for xorg-server-1.5.3-
> So any news on the ATI Front or will I have to rool my own and submit it?
Add "x11-drivers/ati-drivers ~x86" (or ~amd64) to /etc/portage/package.keywords
and you will be able to install 9.6.
It now appears to be asking for xorg-server-1.5.3-r7 (but i'm running it fine
with xorg-server-1.5.3-r
Am Donnerstag 02 Juli 2009 20:52:38 schrieb Hazen Valliant-Saunders:
> So any news on the ATI Front or will I have to rool my own and submit it?
well, it is in the tree
this is from the Changelog:
*ati-drivers-9.6 (25 Jun 2009)
25 Jun 2009; Tomáš Chvátal
+files/kernel/2.6.29.patch, +files/
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 1:52 PM, Hazen
Valliant-Saunders wrote:
> So any news on the ATI Front or will I have to rool my own and submit it?
There is an ebuild for them in the sabayon overlay
So any news on the ATI Front or will I have to rool my own and submit it?
--
Hazen Valliant-Saunders
IT/IS Consultant
(613) 355-5977
19 matches
Mail list logo
