On Dienstag 13 April 2010, Rudmer van Dijk wrote:
> On Tuesday 13 April 2010, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> > On Dienstag 13 April 2010, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > while ati-drivers-8.721 is working just fine with xorg-server-1.7.6
> > > it is blocked by the recent xorg-server-1.
On Tuesday 13 April 2010, Rudmer van Dijk wrote:
> On Tuesday 13 April 2010, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> > On Dienstag 13 April 2010, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > while ati-drivers-8.721 is working just fine with xorg-server-1.7.6
> > > it is blocked by the recent xorg-server-1.8
On Tuesday 13 April 2010, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> On Dienstag 13 April 2010, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > while ati-drivers-8.721 is working just fine with xorg-server-1.7.6
> > it is blocked by the recent xorg-server-1.8.0 .
> > Is there a more recent version of the ati-drivers, a
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 04:13:40PM +0200, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> while ati-drivers-8.721 is working just fine with xorg-server-1.7.6
> it is blocked by the recent xorg-server-1.8.0 .
> Is there a more recent version of the ati-drivers, already?
>
> Many thank for some info,
> Helmut.
>
On Dienstag 13 April 2010, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> while ati-drivers-8.721 is working just fine with xorg-server-1.7.6
> it is blocked by the recent xorg-server-1.8.0 .
> Is there a more recent version of the ati-drivers, already?
no
Hi,
while ati-drivers-8.721 is working just fine with xorg-server-1.7.6
it is blocked by the recent xorg-server-1.8.0 .
Is there a more recent version of the ati-drivers, already?
Many thank for some info,
Helmut.
--
Helmut Jarausch
Lehrstuhl fuer Numerische Mathematik
RWTH - Aachen University
On Sat, July 4, 2009 22:54, Willie Wong wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 04, 2009 at 04:22:59AM +0200, Penguin Lover Jes?s Guerrero
> squawked:
>
>>
>> On Sat, July 4, 2009 03:58, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
>>
>>> On Samstag 04 Juli 2009, Jes?s Guerrero wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I don't filter anything. Just de
On Sat, Jul 04, 2009 at 04:22:59AM +0200, Penguin Lover Jes?s Guerrero squawked:
>
> On Sat, July 4, 2009 03:58, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> > On Samstag 04 Juli 2009, Jes?s Guerrero wrote:
> >
> >
> > I don't filter anything. Just default metalog with default settings.
>
> I use sysklogd, that
On Samstag 04 Juli 2009, Jesús Guerrero wrote:
> On Sat, July 4, 2009 03:58, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> > On Samstag 04 Juli 2009, Jesús Guerrero wrote:
> >
> >
> > I don't filter anything. Just default metalog with default settings.
>
> I use sysklogd, that shouldn't matter much though. The con
On Sat, July 4, 2009 03:58, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> On Samstag 04 Juli 2009, Jesús Guerrero wrote:
>
>
> I don't filter anything. Just default metalog with default settings.
I use sysklogd, that shouldn't matter much though. The config is pretty
standard, and certainly there's nothing relat
On Samstag 04 Juli 2009, Jesús Guerrero wrote:
>
> > And please - the open ones aren't that bad. When did
> > you try them the last time?
>
> Some days ago. During months for now.
me too - with 2.6.30 and everything. 2d was very good, better than vesa. 3d
does not work - of course. The only reas
Gentelmen,
there's no need for a flame war;
for some it's stable for others it's not, hence the reason it's still in
development.
Regards,
Hazen.
2009/7/3 Jesús Guerrero
>
> On Sat, July 4, 2009 03:17, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> > On Freitag 03 Juli 2009, Jesús Guerrero wrote:
> >
> >> If
On Sat, July 4, 2009 03:17, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> On Freitag 03 Juli 2009, Jesús Guerrero wrote:
>
>> If I have to choose between one closed driver that works perfectly and
>> one close driver that works bad+2 open ones that simply don't work, I
>> choose the closed driver that works.
>
>
On Freitag 03 Juli 2009, Jesús Guerrero wrote:
> On Fri, July 3, 2009 20:30, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> > Well, AMD uses a fixed cycle - one release a month. They also have a
> > fixed development cycle that takes roughly 3 month (all explained on
> > phoronix a long time ago). So supporting the
On Fri, July 3, 2009 21:56, Sebastian Beßler wrote:
> Jesús Guerrero schrieb:
>
>
>> I really advice to stay in .28 if you are going to use fglrx.
>>
>
> That is exactly what the ebuild says after building with a kernel >2.6.28
>
>
> "Kernels newer then 2.6.28 are heavily patched and might result
On Fri, July 3, 2009 20:30, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> Well, AMD uses a fixed cycle - one release a month. They also have a
> fixed development cycle that takes roughly 3 month (all explained on
> phoronix a long time ago). So supporting the latest kernels is not easy or
> even possible.
Very
Well, AMD uses a fixed cycle - one release a month. They also have a fixed
development cycle that takes roughly 3 month (all explained on phoronix a long
time ago). So supporting the latest kernels is not easy or even possible.
They also only support a few distros. If you insist on using a non-s
I was reffering to the fact that ATI has a history of support issues within
Linux.
As for "Understanding" all I know is emerge ati-drivers where my keywords
file contains all the nifty means to unmask the packages & dependencies I
need still results in an unusable X. (which is why it's been revere
On Freitag 03 Juli 2009, Hazen Valliant-Saunders wrote:
>
> No really the ATI installer does not work!? Go figure.
>
you really do not understand. It is not a matter of 'does it work' or not. The
installer dumps a couple of files into the system - and on a gentoo system in
all the wrong places
No really the ATI installer does not work!? Go figure.
It's a clean & fresh install (habbit of mine)
I had to unmask a few packages but there were no kernel patches so..
Due to the miserable failure I'll wait some more.
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 3:36 AM, Volker Armin Hemmann <
volkerar...@googlem
On Freitag 03 Juli 2009, Adam Carter wrote:
> > So any news on the ATI Front or will I have to rool my own and submit it?
>
> Add "x11-drivers/ati-drivers ~x86" (or ~amd64) to
> /etc/portage/package.keywords and you will be able to install 9.6.
>
> It now appears to be asking for xorg-server-1.5.3-
> So any news on the ATI Front or will I have to rool my own and submit it?
Add "x11-drivers/ati-drivers ~x86" (or ~amd64) to /etc/portage/package.keywords
and you will be able to install 9.6.
It now appears to be asking for xorg-server-1.5.3-r7 (but i'm running it fine
with xorg-server-1.5.3-r
Am Donnerstag 02 Juli 2009 20:52:38 schrieb Hazen Valliant-Saunders:
> So any news on the ATI Front or will I have to rool my own and submit it?
well, it is in the tree
this is from the Changelog:
*ati-drivers-9.6 (25 Jun 2009)
25 Jun 2009; Tomáš Chvátal
+files/kernel/2.6.29.patch, +files/
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 1:52 PM, Hazen
Valliant-Saunders wrote:
> So any news on the ATI Front or will I have to rool my own and submit it?
There is an ebuild for them in the sabayon overlay
So any news on the ATI Front or will I have to rool my own and submit it?
--
Hazen Valliant-Saunders
IT/IS Consultant
(613) 355-5977
On Tuesday 04 September 2007, Daniel D Jones wrote:
> make[2]: ***
> [/var/tmp/portage/x11-drivers/ati-drivers-8.35.5/work/common/lib/modules/fg
>lrx/build_mod/2.6.x/firegl_public.o] Error 1
> make[1]: ***
> [_module_/var/tmp/portage/x11-drivers/ati-drivers-8.35.5/work/common/lib/mo
>dules/fglrx/bu
On 9/4/07, Daniel D Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> make[2]: ***
> [/var/tmp/portage/x11-drivers/ati-drivers-8.35.5
> /work/common/lib/modules/fglrx/build_mod/2.6.x/firegl_public.o]
> Error 1
> make[1]: ***
> [_module_/var/tmp/portage/x11-drivers/ati-drivers-8.35.5
> /work/common/lib/modules/f
Daniel D Jones wrote:
> make[2]: ***
> [/var/tmp/portage/x11-drivers/ati-drivers-8.35.5/work/common/lib/modules/fglrx/build_mod/2.6.x/firegl_public.o]
>
> Error 1
> make[1]: ***
> [_module_/var/tmp/portage/x11-drivers/ati-drivers-8.35.5/work/common/lib/modules/fglrx/build_mod/2.6.x]
>
> Error
make[2]: ***
[/var/tmp/portage/x11-drivers/ati-drivers-8.35.5/work/common/lib/modules/fglrx/build_mod/2.6.x/firegl_public.o]
Error 1
make[1]: ***
[_module_/var/tmp/portage/x11-drivers/ati-drivers-8.35.5/work/common/lib/modules/fglrx/build_mod/2.6.x]
Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/sr
On 10/17/06, oskar kapala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
When I've tried to emerge world it failed, because xorg-server and
xf86-video-ati require to upgrade this driver.
xorg 7.1 or later require newer drivers. You either have to use the
xf86-video-ati (the open source drivers included with x.org
On Tuesday 17 October 2006 13:47, oskar kapala wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have hp zv6000 (amd64) with ati radeon x200. I'm using:
> x11-drivers/ati-drivers-8.24.8
> or
> x11-drivers/xf86-video-ati-6.5.8.0
> Both work more less ok, but work.
>
> I had >=x11-drivers/ati-drivers-8.25.18 in my
> /etc/portage/p
Hi,
I have hp zv6000 (amd64) with ati radeon x200. I'm using:
x11-drivers/ati-drivers-8.24.8
or
x11-drivers/xf86-video-ati-6.5.8.0
Both work more less ok, but work.
I had >=x11-drivers/ati-drivers-8.25.18 in my
/etc/portage/package.mask because drivers later than 8.24.8 doesn't
support my card (
On Sunday 15 October 2006 12:13, Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
> On Sunday 15 October 2006 11:03, Dan Johansson wrote:
> [SNIP]
>
> > > > # emerge -uDvNp --tree world
> > > >
> > > > These are the packages that would be merged, in reverse order:
> > > >
> > > > Calculating world dependencies |
> > > >
On Sunday 15 October 2006 11:03, Dan Johansson wrote:
[SNIP]
> > > # emerge -uDvNp --tree world
> > >
> > > These are the packages that would be merged, in reverse order:
> > >
> > > Calculating world dependencies |
> > > !!! All ebuilds that could satisfy ">=x11-drivers/ati-drivers-8.27.10"
> > >
On Sunday 15 October 2006 10:47, Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
> On Sunday 15 October 2006 10:30, Dan Johansson wrote:
> [SNIP]
>
> > > Post the output of `emerge -uDvNp --tree world`
> >
> > Here's the output.
> >
> > # emerge -uDvNp --tree world
> >
> > These are the packages that would be merged, in
On Sunday 15 October 2006 10:30, Dan Johansson wrote:
[SNIP]
> > Post the output of `emerge -uDvNp --tree world`
>
> Here's the output.
>
> # emerge -uDvNp --tree world
>
> These are the packages that would be merged, in reverse order:
>
> Calculating world dependencies |
> !!! All ebuilds that cou
On Saturday 14 October 2006 22:14, Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
> On Saturday 14 October 2006 11:37, Dan Johansson wrote:
> [SNIP]
>
> > Today when I did an "emerge --sync" and "emerge -uDvNp world" I'm getting
>
> [SNIP]
>
> > Any suggestions on how to solve this?
> Post the output of `emerge -uDvNp
On 10/14/06, Dan Johansson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Today when I did an "emerge --sync" and "emerge -uDvNp world" I'm getting
the following error message:
Calculating world dependencies |
!!! All ebuilds that could satisfy ">=x11-drivers/ati-drivers-8.27.10"
have been masked.
Add --tree to se
On Saturday 14 October 2006 11:37, Dan Johansson wrote:
[SNIP]
> Today when I did an "emerge --sync" and "emerge -uDvNp world" I'm getting
[SNIP]
> Any suggestions on how to solve this?
Post the output of `emerge -uDvNp --tree world`
--
Bo Andresen
pgpUl4OgQghSA.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm having trouble updating my notebook (HP-nw8000) which has a "RV350
[Mobility Radeon 9600 M10]" video card. For this notebook I have a
portreplicator with two external monitors connected (one DVI + one VGA).
I'm using the ati-driver-8.24.8 (in PORTD
Hello, i try to install new ati driver on my linux system. The
installation on Xorg and the modprobe action for the fglrx module works
very well, but wharn i try to start an X session, it exits with the
follow error message :
(EE) fglrx(0): No V_BIOS found(EE) fglrx(0): PreInitInt10 failedSetVBEMod
I have installed gentoo on a gateway laptop, with an ATI mobility 9000
radeon video adaptor. Once I have xorg installed, and ati-drivers
(proprietary), tvout was pretty easy to set up using ati's setup
utility, fglrxconfig and a couple of easy changes to
/etc/X11/xorg.conf.
However, I am having t
42 matches
Mail list logo
