On Saturday, 15 June 2024 18:24:04 BST Walter Dnes wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 15, 2024 at 12:39:09PM +0100, Michael wrote
>
> > The maximum temperature at which your CPU die with its 65W TDP starts
> > throttling to keep its temperatures safe is 100°C TjMax. Look at the
> > TJunction number here:
> >
On Sat, Jun 15, 2024 at 12:39:09PM +0100, Michael wrote
> The maximum temperature at which your CPU die with its 65W TDP starts
> throttling to keep its temperatures safe is 100°C TjMax. Look at the
> TJunction number here:
>
>
On Friday, 14 June 2024 20:53:04 BST Walter Dnes wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 14, 2024 at 11:54:52AM +0100, Michael wrote
>
> > I would think 46-48°C is refreshingly cool, but it very much depends
> > on the CPU chip, the MoBo and its BIOS/microcode settings.
>
> I looked up my CPU (see my reply to
On Friday, 14 June 2024 16:16:09 BST Michael wrote:
> Liquid cooling would have made it as quiet as a church mouse. ;-)
I have a machine here with liquid cooling, and over its few years it's become
deafening under full load (24 simultaneous floating-point physics
applications). It is quiet
On Fri, Jun 14, 2024 at 11:54:52AM +0100, Michael wrote
> I would think 46-48°C is refreshingly cool, but it very much depends
> on the CPU chip, the MoBo and its BIOS/microcode settings.
I looked up my CPU (see my reply to Dale). The max temp allowed is
71.3 C. A short kernel compile is one
On Friday, 14 June 2024 15:18:36 BST Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Friday, 14 June 2024 13:55:49 BST William Kenworthy wrote:
> > I have a (now quite old) MSsurface-pro4 with an I5 - it runs about
> > 50-60c on normal use but compiling (for example) webkit-gtk and
> > Libreoffice causes the temp to
On Friday, 14 June 2024 13:55:49 BST William Kenworthy wrote:
> I have a (now quite old) MSsurface-pro4 with an I5 - it runs about
> 50-60c on normal use but compiling (for example) webkit-gtk and
> Libreoffice causes the temp to go way too high. I have a script checking
> the cpu temps - at
On 14/6/24 20:16, Dale wrote:
Walter Dnes wrote:
On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 10:49:57PM -0500, Dale wrote
The biggest thing, find out what the exact specs are for your CPU.
Then go from there. That's your starting point tho.
"grep model /proc/cpuinfo" returns 12 instances of...
model
Walter Dnes wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 10:49:57PM -0500, Dale wrote
>
>> The biggest thing, find out what the exact specs are for your CPU.
>> Then go from there. That's your starting point tho.
> "grep model /proc/cpuinfo" returns 12 instances of...
>
> model : 165
> model
On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 10:49:57PM -0500, Dale wrote
> The biggest thing, find out what the exact specs are for your CPU.
> Then go from there. That's your starting point tho.
"grep model /proc/cpuinfo" returns 12 instances of...
model : 165
model name : Intel(R) Core(TM)
On Friday, 14 June 2024 03:52:38 BST Walter Dnes wrote:
> I've been doing a bunch of kernel-compiling recently and I've switched
> between schedulers from compile to compile to compare. See
> https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v6.6/admin-guide/pm/cpufreq.html for
> background info. All
Walter Dnes wrote:
> I've been doing a bunch of kernel-compiling recently and I've switched
> between schedulers from compile to compile to compare. See
> https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v6.6/admin-guide/pm/cpufreq.html for
> background info. All frequencies in khz. On my machine...
>
> *
I've been doing a bunch of kernel-compiling recently and I've switched
between schedulers from compile to compile to compare. See
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v6.6/admin-guide/pm/cpufreq.html for
background info. All frequencies in khz. On my machine...
* bios_limit == 2901000
*
13 matches
Mail list logo
