On Thursday 20 October 2005 11.50, Holly Bostick wrote:
> I think the forum thread Bill is talking about can be found here:
>
> http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-282474-highlight-rebuild+toolchain.htm
> Hope this helps.
Thanks! I´ll give it a read, and see if it looks safe.
Best regards,
Andr
William Kenworthy schreef:
> reinstall not needed, rebuild in the background whist using it.
>
> rebuild the toolchain with the new CFLAGS, then emerge -e the world
>
> Usually not too difficult, I do it a couple of times a year across
> multiple archs - search the forums as there's some scripts
reinstall not needed, rebuild in the background whist using it.
rebuild the toolchain with the new CFLAGS, then emerge -e the world
Usually not too difficult, I do it a couple of times a year across
multiple archs - search the forums as there's some scripts to help with
multiple toolchain rebuild
On Wednesday 19 October 2005 22.47, Matt Randolph wrote:
> Andreas Karlsson wrote:
> >I went back to -march=athlon-xp. I don´t know how much k8 optimizations
> > does performance-wise, but I guess it ain´t woth a reinstall.
> >
>
> You might want to ask your question again in the gentoo-amd64 list.
Andreas Karlsson wrote:
I went back to -march=athlon-xp. I don´t know how much k8 optimizations does
performance-wise, but I guess it ain´t woth a reinstall.
Best regards,
Andreas Karlsson
Sweden
You might want to ask your question again in the gentoo-amd64 list.
- Matt
--
gentoo-user@ge
I went back to -march=athlon-xp. I don´t know how much k8 optimizations does
performance-wise, but I guess it ain´t woth a reinstall.Best regards,Andreas KarlssonSwedenI think you will only see an improvment if you need 64bit userspace. I.e
. right now you are effectivley running in a 32bit usersp
On Wednesday 19 October 2005 21.35, Joshua Schmidlkofer wrote:
> > Well, tempting as it seems, I am not in the mood for adentures. :)
>
> I have that setup, you have to use gcc 3.4 or higher, I used the jackass
> stuff as a base. I have that + NVidia binary drivers on a desktop - it's
> all very HO
Well, tempting as it seems, I am not in the mood for adentures. :)
I have that setup, you have to use gcc 3.4 or higher, I used the jackass stuff as a base. I have that + NVidia binary drivers on a desktop - it's all very HOT! So, it does work, however, you ahve to pretty much do a clean install
On Wednesday 19 October 2005 21.04, Mike Williams wrote:
> Well, that's an easy one.
> The version of gcc you are using doesn't have support for k8. I bet your
> still on gcc 3.3.X, perhaps even an x86 profile, as an amd64 profile would
> pull in gcc 3.4.X, like my ppc profile does.
Yes, I´am usin
On Wednesday 19 October 2005 19:45, Andreas Karlsson wrote:
> "configure:1708: checking for C compiler default output file name
> configure:1711: i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -march=k8 -O3 -pipe
> -fomit-frame-pointer -ftracer -msse3 -mfpmath=sse3 conftest.c >&5
> cc1: error: bad value (k8) for -march=
On Wednesday 19 October 2005 20.21, Mike Williams wrote:
> On Wednesday 19 October 2005 18:18, Andreas Karlsson wrote:
> > I have a problem (oh, really?). I just upgraded my system from an AMD
> > Athlon 3200+ to a AMD X2 3800+, with new motherboard. Whenever I try to
> > compile anything from port
On Wednesday 19 October 2005 18:18, Andreas Karlsson wrote:
> I have a problem (oh, really?). I just upgraded my system from an AMD
> Athlon 3200+ to a AMD X2 3800+, with new motherboard. Whenever I try to
> compile anything from portage (emerge foobar) I get "C Compiler cannot
> create executables
Hi all,
I have a problem (oh, really?). I just upgraded my system from an AMD Athlon
3200+ to a AMD X2 3800+, with new motherboard. Whenever I try to compile
anything from portage (emerge foobar) I get "C Compiler cannot create
executables". The kernel did compile though.
CFLAGS="-march=k8
13 matches
Mail list logo
