This is the second machine I am getting a 404 in as many weeks with this
package. Is it a known problem, or am I the only one suffering from this?
>>> Emerging (1 of 8) www-plugins/chrome-binary-
plugins-41.0.2272.76_p1::gentoo
* Fetching files in the background. To view fetch progress, run
*
Mick wrote:
> This is the second machine I am getting a 404 in as many weeks with this
> package. Is it a known problem, or am I the only one suffering from this?
>
>
Emerging (1 of 8) www-plugins/chrome-binary-
> plugins-41.0.2272.76_p1::gentoo
> * Fetching files in the background. To view
On Tuesday 10 Mar 2015 22:45:28 Dale wrote:
> Mick wrote:
> > This is the second machine I am getting a 404 in as many weeks with this
> > package. Is it a known problem, or am I the only one suffering from
> > this?
> >
> Emerging (1 of 8) www-plugins/chrome-binary-
> >
> > plugins-41.0.22
On Tuesday, March 10, 2015 11:19:34 PM Mick wrote:
> On Tuesday 10 Mar 2015 22:45:28 Dale wrote:
> > Mick wrote:
> > > This is the second machine I am getting a 404 in as many weeks with this
> > > package. Is it a known problem, or am I the only one suffering from
> > > this?
> > >
> > Emer
On Tuesday 10 Mar 2015 23:33:33 Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
> On Tuesday, March 10, 2015 11:19:34 PM Mick wrote:
> > On Tuesday 10 Mar 2015 22:45:28 Dale wrote:
> > > Mick wrote:
> > > > This is the second machine I am getting a 404 in as many weeks with
> > > > this package. Is it a known problem,
On Wednesday, March 11, 2015 6:20:25 AM Mick wrote:
> On Tuesday 10 Mar 2015 23:33:33 Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
> > On Tuesday, March 10, 2015 11:19:34 PM Mick wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 10 Mar 2015 22:45:28 Dale wrote:
> > > > Mick wrote:
> > > > > This is the second machine I am getting a 404 in as
On Wednesday 11 Mar 2015 06:42:35 Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
> On Wednesday, March 11, 2015 6:20:25 AM Mick wrote:
> > On Tuesday 10 Mar 2015 23:33:33 Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
> > > Google only keeps the latest versions so that ebuild is usually only
> > > good for a short while after it gets mark
On Wed, 11 March 2015, at 6:52 am, Mick wrote:
> ...
> I googled for it and downloaded it from a mirror. Am I correct that if the
> hash is not right the ebuild will complain about it,
Yes.
On Wed, 11 Mar 2015 06:20:25 +, Mick wrote:
> > Google only keeps the latest versions so that ebuild is usually only
> > good for a short while after it gets marked stable.
> > Just keyword the unstable package.
>
> So users of the stable package have to be really fast, or lucky?
Gentoo sh
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 7:05 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Mar 2015 06:20:25 +, Mick wrote:
>
>> > Google only keeps the latest versions so that ebuild is usually only
>> > good for a short while after it gets marked stable.
>> > Just keyword the unstable package.
>>
>> So users of the
On Wednesday, March 11, 2015 6:52:39 AM Mick wrote:
> On Wednesday 11 Mar 2015 06:42:35 Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
> > On Wednesday, March 11, 2015 6:20:25 AM Mick wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 10 Mar 2015 23:33:33 Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
>
> > > > Google only keeps the latest versions so that ebuild i
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 7:38 AM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 7:05 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
>> On Wed, 11 Mar 2015 06:20:25 +, Mick wrote:
>>
>>> > Google only keeps the latest versions so that ebuild is usually only
>>> > good for a short while after it gets marked stable.
>
On Thursday 12 Mar 2015 22:46:14 Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 7:38 AM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 7:05 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> >> On Wed, 11 Mar 2015 06:20:25 +, Mick wrote:
> >>> > Google only keeps the latest versions so that ebuild is usually only
>
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 7:08 PM, Mick wrote:
> On Thursday 12 Mar 2015 22:46:14 Mike Gilbert wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 7:38 AM, Rich Freeman wrote:
>> > On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 7:05 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
>> >> On Wed, 11 Mar 2015 06:20:25 +, Mick wrote:
>> >>> > Google only keeps
14 matches
Mail list logo
