On Tuesday 25 April 2006 08:16 am, Daniel da Veiga wrote:
> On 4/25/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > More news:
> >
> > I successfully got GnuPG 1.9 installed, and then a new problem arose.
> > Configuration.
> >
> > I went to http://kmail.kde.org/kmail-pgpmime-howto.html#gnupg
On 4/25/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> More news:
>
> I successfully got GnuPG 1.9 installed, and then a new problem arose.
> Configuration.
>
> I went to http://kmail.kde.org/kmail-pgpmime-howto.html#gnupg and followed the
> instructions to the best of my ability, and yet I sti
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
More news:
I successfully got GnuPG 1.9 installed, and then a new problem arose.
Configuration.
I went to http://kmail.kde.org/kmail-pgpmime-howto.html#gnupg and followed the
instructions to the best of my ability, and yet I still get this:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/.gn
On Tuesday 25 April 2006 12:51, Mick wrote:
> I only have a couple of minutes so I apologise for not writing a
> complete answer. FWIW the gpg-agent was hard masked (yesterday?) and
> just adding it to your /etc/portage/package.keywords won't work. You
> need to use package.mask instead.
>
> Howe
On 25/04/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> More news:
>
> I successfully got GnuPG 1.9 installed, and then a new problem arose.
> Configuration.
>
> I went to http://kmail.kde.org/kmail-pgpmime-howto.html#gnupg and followed the
> instructions to the best of my ability, and yet I st
More news:
I successfully got GnuPG 1.9 installed, and then a new problem arose.
Configuration.
I went to http://kmail.kde.org/kmail-pgpmime-howto.html#gnupg and followed the
instructions to the best of my ability, and yet I still get this:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/.gnupg $ eval "$(gpg-agent --dae
Justin Findlay wrote:
> On 4/24/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> So I did some hunting and somewhat successfully fixed it. However, it now
>> gives me this output which I think could become problematic in the future:
>>
>> --- Invalid atom in /usr/portage/profiles/package.mask:
On 4/24/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> So I did some hunting and somewhat successfully fixed it. However, it now
> gives me this output which I think could become problematic in the future:
>
> --- Invalid atom in /usr/portage/profiles/package.mask:
> =dev-libs/libassuan-0.6.
On Sunday 23 April 2006 02:17 pm, Mick wrote:
> On 23/04/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > I've been trying to find why I am unable to use GnuPG-agent to sign my
> > messages in KMail, and rather have to type in a password in all the time
> > through KGPG. The problem is that t
On Monday 24 April 2006 02:42 pm, Abhay Kedia wrote:
> On Sunday 23 April 2006 11:36, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > through KGPG. The problem is that the GnuPG agent in the x86 area is
> > version 1.4.2.2, yet KMail demands verison 1.9
>
> The main problem is that gpg-agent has been "Package Masked
On Sunday 23 April 2006 10:39 pm, Alexander Skwar wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > 1) Download version 1.9 from GnuPG's website and install it.
>
> GnuPG 1.9 is in ~x86. If you add it to your keywords file, you'll
> get it.
Where is my keywords file? I'm still extremely new to portage in ge
On Sunday 23 April 2006 11:36, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> through KGPG. The problem is that the GnuPG agent in the x86 area is
> version 1.4.2.2, yet KMail demands verison 1.9
>
The main problem is that gpg-agent has been "Package Masked" in favour of
gnupg-1.9.20-r1. So KMail demands next best a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1) Download version 1.9 from GnuPG's website and install it.
GnuPG 1.9 is in ~x86. If you add it to your keywords file, you'll
get it.
I find it curious that such a problem is living in current source repository
for Gentoo.
What problem?
> I'm positive this isn'
On 23/04/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've been trying to find why I am unable to use GnuPG-agent to sign my
> messages in KMail, and rather have to type in a password in all the time
> through KGPG. The problem is that the GnuPG agent in the x86 area is version
> 1.4.2.2, ye
I've been trying to find why I am unable to use GnuPG-agent to sign my
messages in KMail, and rather have to type in a password in all the time
through KGPG. The problem is that the GnuPG agent in the x86 area is version
1.4.2.2, yet KMail demands verison 1.9
I don't think it wise to change to
15 matches
Mail list logo
