hello everyone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 19.07.2010 16:38, schrieb Neal Hogan:
> On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 2:19 AM, alex wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Am 16.07.2010 20:18, schrieb Neal Hogan:
>>> I'd start a new thread ;-)
>>
>>
>> Thank you, and that me n
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 2:19 AM, alex wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Am 16.07.2010 20:18, schrieb Neal Hogan:
>> I'd start a new thread ;-)
>
>
> Thank you, and that me now what to me? xD
>
Is that a joke?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 16.07.2010 20:18, schrieb Neal Hogan:
> I'd start a new thread ;-)
Thank you, and that me now what to me? xD
Greeting
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
On Fri, 16 Jul 2010 13:18:38 -0500, Neal Hogan wrote:
> I'd start a new thread ;-)
I'd avoid top-posting :P
--
Neil Bothwick
Genius is 99% inspiration and 2% arithmetic
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
I'd start a new thread ;-)
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 9:08 AM, alex wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
>> Hello & Welcome :D
>
> Yeahr, some question. How good is Gentoo for a Samba AD environment?
> I want to install my Gentoo at the work, and for my Data i have to
> conn
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> Hello & Welcome :D
Yeahr, some question. How good is Gentoo for a Samba AD environment?
I want to install my Gentoo at the work, and for my Data i have to
connect to AD. How good will work this with a Gentoo :> ?
Greetings Alex
-BEGIN PG
On Fri, 2010-07-16 at 15:44 +0200, alex wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi all
>
>
> small testing mail
>
> Greeting's alex
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
> Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (MingW32)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
>
> i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all
small testing mail
Greeting's alex
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJMQGJHAAoJEB8n+SuWCkjv96IIALzEF5v5CP5lUpY+i8XugXcN
OcchK0DZYSA6o
On 20:55 Wed 19 Dec , Sven Albrecht wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2007-12-19 at 13:32 -0600, Jesús Abidan Ramos Salas wrote:
> > i am new at this list... i hope i can help
>
> Me too, at first I'm basically reading and learning ^^
>
>
> --
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
>
>
Same here. I've been
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 13:32:18 -0600
Jesús Abidan Ramos Salas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i am new at this list... i hope i can help
Welcome to the list. Long live Gentoo!
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
On Wed, 2007-12-19 at 13:32 -0600, Jesús Abidan Ramos Salas wrote:
> i am new at this list... i hope i can help
Me too, at first I'm basically reading and learning ^^
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
i am new at this list... i hope i can help
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
On 9/7/06, Boris Fersing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
x11-themes/gtk-engines-qt works too. Adding a package without keyword
will imply unstable host arch (cf manpage) :
Ah, ok thanks. I hadn't noticed that...probably because I generally
dislike "implied" behavior. Apologies to A.R.
-Richard
--
On Thu, 7 Sep 2006 19:04:42 +0100, Jeff Rollin wrote:
> On 07/09/06, Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I've read somewhere of being able to tell the system that I
> > > am not worried about packages that haven't been tested on amd64
> > It's ~amd64, not amd64~. The way to set this sy
2006/9/7, Richard Fish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 9/7/06, A. R. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> where each line is the full package name that you want to allow
> "~amd64" for your system. (in your case)
> An example is:
>
> x11-themes/gtk-engines-qt
Small correction... that should be
x11-themes/gtk-e
On 07/09/06, Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 7 Sep 2006 10:10:01 -0500, John Newman wrote:> Up until now, to remedy this when I want to attempt to use one of these> packages, I simply edit the ebuild, regenerate the digest, and do the> installation. I feel sure there is an easier
On 9/7/06, A. R. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
where each line is the full package name that you want to allow
"~amd64" for your system. (in your case)
An example is:
x11-themes/gtk-engines-qt
Small correction... that should be
x11-themes/gtk-engines-qt ~amd64
-Richard
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org
On Thu, 7 Sep 2006 10:10:01 -0500, John Newman wrote:
> Up until now, to remedy this when I want to attempt to use one of these
> packages, I simply edit the ebuild, regenerate the digest, and do the
> installation. I feel sure there is an easier way around this - I've
> read somewhere of being a
On Thu, 7 Sep 2006, A. R. wrote:
2. Whilst I appreciate the courtesy (!), posts are more likely to stand
out,
and therefore be read, if they have a more "on-topic" subject line than
"hello", or some such. For example, a better one for this thread might be
"how to unmask packages?" or ev
2. Whilst I appreciate the courtesy (!), posts are more likely to stand out,
and therefore be read, if they have a more "on-topic" subject line than
"hello", or some such. For example, a better one for this thread might be
"how to unmask packages?" or even just "amd64?".
Well, and elegantly said
On 07/09/06, A. R. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Up until now, to remedy this when I want to attempt to use one of these> packages, I simply edit the ebuild, regenerate the digest, and do the> installation. I feel sure there is an easier way around this - I've
> read somewhere of being able to tell
2006/9/7, John Newman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I have what is probably a stupid question. I run an amd64 gentoo
system. I find that lots of packages have in their KEYWORDS "amd64~".
Up until now, to remedy this when I want to attempt to use one of these
packages, I simply edit the ebuild, regenera
Up until now, to remedy this when I want to attempt to use one of these
packages, I simply edit the ebuild, regenerate the digest, and do the
installation. I feel sure there is an easier way around this - I've
read somewhere of being able to tell the system that I am not worried
about packages th
I have what is probably a stupid question. I run an amd64 gentoo
system. I find that lots of packages have in their KEYWORDS "amd64~".
Up until now, to remedy this when I want to attempt to use one of these
packages, I simply edit the ebuild, regenerate the digest, and do the
installation. I fe
On 3/7/06, A.R.S. KA9QLQ Alvin Koffman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I remember asking about a graphical frountend [like synaptit in Mepis] and
> was told "we're working on it." How's it coming?
take a look at porthole it's in portage
$ eix porthole
* app-portage/porthole
Available versions:
I looked at gentoo about 2 years back when I wanted to switch from
Mandrake, I went with Mepis and realy liked 3.3 but 3.4-3 doesn't seem as
good. Don't like how they changed the reopositories. So I thought I'd look
to gentoo again, and am please to see they're really making progress.
Looks like th
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>> The message contains Unicode characters and has been sent as a binary
>> attachment.
> -
> Virus report (proxy4)
> Virus was found and quarantined in
Nice.
I think it would be an excellent idea t
On Tue, 2006-01-17 at 12:52 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Are those people really too stupid to realise that it is useless
> to send windows viruses to linux mailing list???
Are there still people so stupid that they reply to virus spam?!!11!
1eleventyone!
--
Owen Ford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
()
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> The message contains Unicode characters and has been sent as a binary
> attachment.
-
Virus report (proxy4)
Virus was found and quarantined in
http://www.gmxattachments.net/de/cgi/msgpart/xjzmy%2Ezip?LANG=de&MSGNO=19%2D9452101f
30 matches
Mail list logo
