Peter Humphrey wrote:
On Sunday 21 August 2011 04:04:05 Matthew Finkel wrote:
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 10:46 PM, Dale wrote:
How hard is it to set up a 64 bit machine to compile programs for a 32
bit system?
Dale
:-) :-)
It's actually quite easy. IIRC, when I did it last,
On 08/22/2011 01:41 PM, Alex Schuster wrote:
>>> > > I don't think this is true - as long as the CHOST is identical, there
>>> > > should be no problem.
>> >
>> > CHOST defines the arch (i686, amd64, arm ..) whilst CFLAGS control gcc
>> > behavior and the binary code generation produced by compile
On 08/22/2011 01:41 PM, Alex Schuster wrote:
>>> > > I don't think this is true - as long as the CHOST is identical, there
>>> > > should be no problem.
>> >
>> > CHOST defines the arch (i686, amd64, arm ..) whilst CFLAGS control gcc
>> > behavior and the binary code generation produced by compile
victor romanchuk writes:
> >> i had noticed that distcc is peevish about CFLAGS: these should be
> >> compatible on both client and server. in my case i made these
> >> similar on both machines (laptop is core2duo and desktop is
> >> core2quad; both are running amd64 arch)
> >
> > I don't think
On Sun, 21 Aug 2011 15:53:15 +0200, Joost Roeleveld wrote:
> Is there a way to automate the steps inside the chroot without having
> to have a script inside the chroot?
This is the script I use. You can call it with "ch hostname" or symlink
it to chhostname. That way I can use the same script for
On Sunday 21 August 2011 14:53:15 Joost Roeleveld wrote:
> That would help as I'm planning on setting this up myself as well for my
> netbook.
Right. I have two Konsoles open on my workstation, which is the compilation
host. In one I "su -" and in the
other I "ssh serv" (this is the client Atom
>
>> i had noticed that distcc is peevish about CFLAGS: these should be
>> compatible on both client and server. in my case i made these similar on
>> both machines (laptop is core2duo and desktop is core2quad; both are
>> running amd64 arch)
> I don't think this is true - as long as the CHOST is
On Sunday, August 21, 2011 10:41:56 AM Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Sunday 21 August 2011 04:04:05 Matthew Finkel wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 10:46 PM, Dale wrote:
> > > How hard is it to set up a 64 bit machine to compile programs for a
> > > 32
> > > bit system?
> > >
> > > Dale
> > >
> >
victor romanchuk writes:
> > Both machines contain "distcc" in FEATURES. It's not using
> > -march=native. I've tried various -jN values with no real difference
> > in performance.
-jN in make.conf's MAPEOPTS variable I assume, not as argument to emerge,
which does something different. It also h
On Sunday 21 August 2011 04:04:05 Matthew Finkel wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 10:46 PM, Dale wrote:
> > How hard is it to set up a 64 bit machine to compile programs for a 32
> > bit system?
> >
> > Dale
> >
> > :-) :-)
>
> It's actually quite easy. IIRC, when I did it last, the only diff
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 10:46 PM, Dale wrote:
> Peter Humphrey wrote:
>
>> On Sunday 21 August 2011 02:08:51 Paul Hartman wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> Could I just export the entire laptop - everything from the root
>>> directory and below - and chroot into that over the network? Then I
>>> wouldn't even
Peter Humphrey wrote:
On Sunday 21 August 2011 02:08:51 Paul Hartman wrote:
Could I just export the entire laptop - everything from the root
directory and below - and chroot into that over the network? Then I
wouldn't even need to emerge -k...
No, I tried that and got myself tied in
On Sunday 21 August 2011 02:08:51 Paul Hartman wrote:
> Could I just export the entire laptop - everything from the root
> directory and below - and chroot into that over the network? Then I
> wouldn't even need to emerge -k...
No, I tried that and got myself tied in knots - well, actually it was
> Both machines contain "distcc" in FEATURES. It's not using
> -march=native. I've tried various -jN values with no real difference
> in performance.
only client (your laptop) machine should be distcc featured. for server
(desktop) that feature is useless
> On the desktop, /etc/conf.d/distcc con
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 7:35 PM, Peter Humphrey
wrote:
> On Saturday 20 August 2011 23:56:08 Paul Hartman wrote:
>
>> I have a fast desktop computer and a slow laptop. Both are ~amd64
>> Gentoo. After some of the recent discussions about Gentoo on slow
>> devices, I thought I'd dust off the laptop
On Saturday 20 August 2011 23:56:08 Paul Hartman wrote:
> I have a fast desktop computer and a slow laptop. Both are ~amd64
> Gentoo. After some of the recent discussions about Gentoo on slow
> devices, I thought I'd dust off the laptop and try to bring it up to
> date.
>
> I'd like to use distcc
Hi,
I have a fast desktop computer and a slow laptop. Both are ~amd64
Gentoo. After some of the recent discussions about Gentoo on slow
devices, I thought I'd dust off the laptop and try to bring it up to
date.
I'd like to use distcc to make the desktop do all the compiling during
emerges. I've n
17 matches
Mail list logo
