Philip Webb wrote:
> Does anyone have advice based on experience using LVM ?
> I sb partitioning a new 320 GB hard drive soon for a simple desktop box.
> That is 8 times the size of the HDD in my present machine,
> which I haven't exhausted by any means. LVM seems more professional
> & allows
On Sun, Oct 07, 2007 at 09:26:33PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> A total non-issue in my experience. I've never had an LVM problem yet,
> but maybe I'm just lucky. The one thing you do need to be aware of it
> that you require LVM support at boot time or shortly thereafter. So
> either compile
Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Sunday 07 October 2007, Florian Philipp wrote:
- You loose bit performance, but not much, you won't feel it without
benchmarks.
I very much doubt this. LVM is one extra layer between the filesystem
and the physical disk and it basically consists of a mapping b
On Sunday 07 October 2007, Philip Webb wrote:
> Does anyone have advice based on experience using LVM ?
The majority of folks around here will have used LVM :-)
> I sb partitioning a new 320 GB hard drive soon for a simple desktop
> box. That is 8 times the size of the HDD in my present machi
On Sunday 07 October 2007, Florian Philipp wrote:
> Philip Webb schrieb:
> > Does anyone have advice based on experience using LVM ?
> Simple pros and cons?
>
> Pro:
> - You loose bit performance, but not much, you won't feel it without
> benchmarks.
I very much doubt this. LVM is one extra
Philip Webb schrieb:
Does anyone have advice based on experience using LVM ?
I sb partitioning a new 320 GB hard drive soon for a simple desktop box.
That is 8 times the size of the HDD in my present machine,
which I haven't exhausted by any means. LVM seems more professional
& allows flexib
Never had a problem with LVM.
On a mythTV box with LVM, started with 80GB IDE, then added in a 300Gb
IDE, then a few months later another 300mb, sata this time. Basicly
transparent to Myth
I have avoided LVM on laptops before now because its extra complexity
and I'll never add multiple disks.
B
On Sunday 07 October 2007, Philip Webb wrote:
> Does anyone have advice based on experience using LVM ?
> I sb partitioning a new 320 GB hard drive soon for a simple desktop box.
> That is 8 times the size of the HDD in my present machine,
> which I haven't exhausted by any means. LVM seems mo
Does anyone have advice based on experience using LVM ?
I sb partitioning a new 320 GB hard drive soon for a simple desktop box.
That is 8 times the size of the HDD in my present machine,
which I haven't exhausted by any means. LVM seems more professional
& allows flexibility for unforeseen st
9 matches
Mail list logo
