On Friday 02 May 2008, Sandro Hannemann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On linux-2.6.25 NTFS write support is finally stable...
>
> CONFIG_NTFS_FS=y
> CONFIG_NTFS_RW=y
>
> No need to go FAT anymore...
Not quite.
It's not ntfs-ng, it's the same old ntfs write support that's been there
for ages, and it's *part
On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 10:22 AM, Sandro Hannemann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On linux-2.6.25 NTFS write support is finally stable...
>
> CONFIG_NTFS_FS=y
> CONFIG_NTFS_RW=y
>
> No need to go FAT anymore...
>
> Cheers,
> Sandro
>
I'll keep that in mind. Thanks. However that's not on
On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 10:01 AM, Etaoin Shrdlu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
:
> >
> > sda1 -> /boot = 50MB
> > sda2 -> swap (unsure whether I should dedicate 4GB to this. That's 5%
> > of my drive and I won't likely ever use all of 2GB or RAM.)
> > sda3 -> /var = 2GB
> > sda4 ==extended
> > sd
On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 10:34 AM, Dirk Heinrichs
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am Freitag, 2. Mai 2008 schrieb Mark Knecht:
>
>
> > I presume I'll use
> >
> > grub> root(hd0,4)
> > to point at my root and still use
>
> That should be grub's root (/boot), NOT linux' (/), means (hd0,1) if /boot is
Am Freitag, 2. Mai 2008 schrieb Mark Knecht:
> I presume I'll use
>
> grub> root(hd0,4)
> to point at my root and still use
That should be grub's root (/boot), NOT linux' (/), means (hd0,1) if /boot is
sda2.
> grub> setup (hd0) to get grub installed into the MBR?
That's correct.
Bye...
On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 10:06 AM, Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 02 May 2008, Mark Knecht wrote:
> > My Windows Vista laptop ate the big one from M$ and died under the
> > weight of Windows Update. The hardware seems to check out fine
> > overnight so I'm going to finally do
Hi,
On linux-2.6.25 NTFS write support is finally stable...
CONFIG_NTFS_FS=y
CONFIG_NTFS_RW=y
No need to go FAT anymore...
Cheers,
Sandro
--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
Am Freitag, 2. Mai 2008 schrieb Mark Knecht:
> My Windows Vista laptop ate the big one from M$ and died under the
> weight of Windows Update. The hardware seems to check out fine
> overnight so I'm going to finally do dual boot on this machine like I
> wanted to when I bought it.
>
> Data:
>
> 80GB
On Friday 02 May 2008, Mark Knecht wrote:
> My Windows Vista laptop ate the big one from M$ and died under the
> weight of Windows Update. The hardware seems to check out fine
> overnight so I'm going to finally do dual boot on this machine like I
> wanted to when I bought it.
>
> Data:
>
> 80GB ha
On Friday 2 May 2008, 18:41, Mark Knecht wrote:
> Data:
>
> 80GB hard drive
> 2GB DRAM
>
> Questions:
>
> 1) What's the recommended order to install dual boot today. I prefer
> to go Gentoo first, XP second. Any issues?
Yes. XP will blow away the MBR and replace it with its own MBR, so, to be
ab
My Windows Vista laptop ate the big one from M$ and died under the
weight of Windows Update. The hardware seems to check out fine
overnight so I'm going to finally do dual boot on this machine like I
wanted to when I bought it.
Data:
80GB hard drive
2GB DRAM
Questions:
1) What's the recommended
11 matches
Mail list logo
