OK. Sort of dealt with the LVM part so now to step two. I'm trying to
follow this:
http://en.gentoo-wiki.com/wiki/Initramfs
Then I get confused. I get to Applications and I'm sort of lost here.
In there it talks about copying nano and its friends over to the init
directory. Then below th
On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 1:02 PM, Dale wrote:
> OK. Sort of dealt with the LVM part so now to step two. I'm trying to
> follow this:
>
> http://en.gentoo-wiki.com/wiki/Initramfs
>
> Then I get confused. I get to Applications and I'm sort of lost here. In
> there it talks about copying nano and
Mark Knecht wrote:
On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 1:02 PM, Dale wrote:
OK. Sort of dealt with the LVM part so now to step two. I'm trying to
follow this:
http://en.gentoo-wiki.com/wiki/Initramfs
Then I get confused. I get to Applications and I'm sort of lost here. In
there it talks about copying
On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 4:44 PM, Dale wrote:
> Mark Knecht wrote:
>> On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 1:02 PM, Dale wrote:
> That's what I was thinking to. I know busybox does a LOT of things but I
> didn't think it was a nano replacement either. OK. I got both of those in
> there at least. First prob
On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 1:44 PM, Dale wrote:
> Mark Knecht wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 1:02 PM, Dale wrote:
>>>
>>> OK. Sort of dealt with the LVM part so now to step two. I'm trying to
>>> follow this:
>>>
>>> http://en.gentoo-wiki.com/wiki/Initramfs
>>>
>>> Then I get confused. I ge
On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 1:51 PM, Michael Mol wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 4:44 PM, Dale wrote:
>> Mark Knecht wrote:
>>> On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 1:02 PM, Dale wrote:
>> That's what I was thinking to. I know busybox does a LOT of things but I
>> didn't think it was a nano replacement either.
Mark Knecht wrote:
On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 1:44 PM, Dale wrote:
That's what I was thinking to. I know busybox does a LOT of things but I
didn't think it was a nano replacement either. OK. I got both of those in
there at least. First problem dealt with I guess. Wonder what else I
should pu
On 2011-09-17 22:54, Mark Knecht wrote:
>> That's what I was thinking to. I know busybox does a LOT of things but I
>> didn't think it was a nano replacement either. OK. I got both of those in
>> there at least. First problem dealt with I guess. Wonder what else I
>> should put in there too.
Mark Knecht wrote:
On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 1:51 PM, Michael Mol wrote:
On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 4:44 PM, Dale wrote:
Mark Knecht wrote:
On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 1:02 PM, Dalewrote:
That's what I was thinking to. I know busybox does a LOT of things but I
didn't think it was a nano replace
On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 2:17 PM, Dale wrote:
> Mark Knecht wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 1:51 PM, Michael Mol wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 4:44 PM, Dale wrote:
Mark Knecht wrote:
>
> On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 1:02 PM, Dale wrote:
That's what I was th
Mark Knecht wrote:
While I was out walking my dog I sort of remembered that there are
just a few apps I had to build static, or at least that I build
static. One, I think was grub. The first and only time I did it I had
to do it 3 or 4 times before I got everything I needed working
correctly. Thi
On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 6:27 PM, Dale wrote:
> Mark Knecht wrote:
> I think there are only a few that has that flag, at least that I would put
> in the init thingy anyway. Maybe this is something that the devs will work
> on if it can be done. May be a big if there.
>
> That is the guide I am tr
On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Dale wrote:
> Mark Knecht wrote:
>>
>> While I was out walking my dog I sort of remembered that there are
>> just a few apps I had to build static, or at least that I build
>> static. One, I think was grub. The first and only time I did it I had
>> to do it 3 or 4
On Sat, 17 Sep 2011 13:27:45 -0700
Mark Knecht wrote:
> > Then I get confused. I get to Applications and I'm sort of lost
> > here. In there it talks about copying nano and its friends over to
> > the init directory. Then below that it says to use busybox. Well,
> > which is it? Do I do both
Michael Mol wrote:
On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 6:27 PM, Dale wrote:
Mark Knecht wrote:
I think there are only a few that has that flag, at least that I would put
in the init thingy anyway. Maybe this is something that the devs will work
on if it can be done. May be a big if there.
That is the gu
Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Sat, 17 Sep 2011 13:27:45 -0700
Mark Knecht wrote:
Then I get confused. I get to Applications and I'm sort of lost
here. In there it talks about copying nano and its friends over to
the init directory. Then below that it says to use busybox. Well,
which is it? Do I
On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 10:13 PM, Dale wrote:
> Michael Mol wrote:
[snippage]
> Ah. I see now. So, it mounts proc and sys but that is in the init then
> it mounts the real root outside the init. Then it umounts the proc and sys
> under the init and then switches to the real root and start
On Sep 18, 2011 9:22 AM, "Michael Mol" wrote:
>
> On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 10:13 PM, Dale wrote:
> > Michael Mol wrote:
>
> [snippage]
>
> > Ah. I see now. So, it mounts proc and sys but that is in the init
then
> > it mounts the real root outside the init. Then it umounts the proc and
sys
On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 7:13 PM, Dale wrote:
>
> Ah. I see now. So, it mounts proc and sys but that is in the init then
> it mounts the real root outside the init. Then it umounts the proc and sys
> under the init and then switches to the real root and starts init there.
>
> Where does /us
19 matches
Mail list logo
