On Sat, Mar 7, 2020 at 11:26 AM Ivan T. Ivanov wrote:
>
> Quoting Rich Freeman (2020-03-06 23:13:55)
> >
> > The patched firmware executes before any software you boot, assuming
> > your device was patched before the hacker got his hands on it.
> >
>
> Well, they say that vulnerability is inside
Quoting Rich Freeman (2020-03-06 23:13:55)
> On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 3:55 PM Wols Lists wrote:
> >
> > On 06/03/20 19:39, Rich Freeman wrote:
> > >
> > > They don't detail the effort required. If the firmware is patched it
> > > sounds like it still requires tinkering with hardware.
> >
> > By
On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 3:55 PM Wols Lists wrote:
>
> On 06/03/20 19:39, Rich Freeman wrote:
> >
> > They don't detail the effort required. If the firmware is patched it
> > sounds like it still requires tinkering with hardware.
>
> By then it's TOO LATE. The firmware is signed for security, AND
On 06/03/20 19:39, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 2:07 PM Wols Lists wrote:
>>
>> On 06/03/20 13:48, Rich Freeman wrote:
>>> If you fall into this camp you need to still update your firmware to
>>> address the non-TPM-user and to avoid making it trivial for software
>>> to steal
I just fell in love with Intel a bit more.
---
Aisha
blog.aisha.cc
On 2020-03-06 14:39, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 2:07 PM Wols Lists
wrote:
On 06/03/20 13:48, Rich Freeman wrote:
> If you fall into this camp you need to still update your firmware to
> address the
On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 2:07 PM Wols Lists wrote:
>
> On 06/03/20 13:48, Rich Freeman wrote:
> > If you fall into this camp you need to still update your firmware to
> > address the non-TPM-user and to avoid making it trivial for software
> > to steal your keys/etc. However, you need to be aware
On 06/03/20 13:48, Rich Freeman wrote:
> If you fall into this camp you need to still update your firmware to
> address the non-TPM-user and to avoid making it trivial for software
> to steal your keys/etc. However, you need to be aware that you are no
> longer secure against physical theft of
On Friday, 6 March 2020 13:48:00 GMT Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 3:50 AM Michael wrote:
> > I have lost count with the naming scheme of Intel's embedded spyware to
> > know if this is yet another vulnerability, or something to convince me to
> > throw away the last Intel powered
On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 3:50 AM Michael wrote:
>
> I have lost count with the naming scheme of Intel's embedded spyware to know
> if this is yet another vulnerability, or something to convince me to throw
> away the last Intel powered box still in my possession (mind you its >10yr
> old):
>
>
I have lost count with the naming scheme of Intel's embedded spyware to know
if this is yet another vulnerability, or something to convince me to throw
away the last Intel powered box still in my possession (mind you its >10yr
old):
10 matches
Mail list logo
