Re: [gentoo-user] Nmap 4.85BETA5 ebuild (Conficker scanning)

2009-04-02 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Friday 03 April 2009 08:40:58 Stroller wrote: > On 2 Apr 2009, at 23:00, Mick wrote: > > On Tuesday 31 March 2009, Stroller wrote: > >> This command performs the scan: > >> nmap -PN -T4 -p139,445 -n -v --script=smb-check-vulns --script-args > >> safe=1 192.168.0.0/16 > > > > Does this mean that

Re: [gentoo-user] Nmap 4.85BETA5 ebuild (Conficker scanning)

2009-04-02 Thread Stroller
On 2 Apr 2009, at 23:00, Mick wrote: On Tuesday 31 March 2009, Stroller wrote: This command performs the scan: nmap -PN -T4 -p139,445 -n -v --script=smb-check-vulns --script-args safe=1 192.168.0.0/16 Does this mean that if you have shut down ports 139 & 445 on the MSWIndows machine Confi

Re: [gentoo-user] Nmap 4.85BETA5 ebuild (Conficker scanning)

2009-04-02 Thread Mick
On Tuesday 31 March 2009, Stroller wrote: > This command performs the scan: > nmap -PN -T4 -p139,445 -n -v --script=smb-check-vulns --script-args > safe=1 192.168.0.0/16 Does this mean that if you have shut down ports 139 & 445 on the MSWIndows machine Conficker cannot work? -- Regards, Mick

Re: [gentoo-user] Nmap 4.85BETA5 ebuild (Conficker scanning)

2009-03-31 Thread Stroller
On 31 Mar 2009, at 11:50, Daniel Pielmeier wrote: 2009/3/31 Stroller : I tried copying nmap-4.76.ebuild (the latest in the Portage tree) to /usr/local/portage/net-analyzer/nmap/nmap-4.85_beta5.ebuild and added the MY_P="${P/_beta/BETA}" line from http://bugs.gentoo.org/attachment.cgi?id=8

Re: [gentoo-user] Nmap 4.85BETA5 ebuild (Conficker scanning)

2009-03-31 Thread Daniel Pielmeier
2009/3/31 Stroller : > > On 31 Mar 2009, at 09:47, Daniel Pielmeier wrote: > >> 2009/3/31 Stroller : >>> >>> I tried copying nmap-4.76.ebuild (the latest in the Portage tree) to >>> /usr/local/portage/net-analyzer/nmap/nmap-4.85_beta5.ebuild and added the >>> MY_P="${P/_beta/BETA}" line from >>> ht

Re: [gentoo-user] Nmap 4.85BETA5 ebuild (Conficker scanning)

2009-03-31 Thread Xav'
On Tue, 31 Mar 2009 10:33:12 +0100, Stroller wrote: > On 31 Mar 2009, at 09:47, Daniel Pielmeier wrote: > >> 2009/3/31 Stroller : >>> I tried copying nmap-4.76.ebuild (the latest in the Portage tree) to >>> /usr/local/portage/net-analyzer/nmap/nmap-4.85_beta5.ebuild and >>> added the >>> MY_P="

Re: [gentoo-user] Nmap 4.85BETA5 ebuild (Conficker scanning)

2009-03-31 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Tuesday 31 March 2009 11:33:12 Stroller wrote: > On 31 Mar 2009, at 09:47, Daniel Pielmeier wrote: > > 2009/3/31 Stroller : > >> I tried copying nmap-4.76.ebuild (the latest in the Portage tree) to > >> /usr/local/portage/net-analyzer/nmap/nmap-4.85_beta5.ebuild and > >> added the > >> MY_P="${P

Re: [gentoo-user] Nmap 4.85BETA5 ebuild (Conficker scanning)

2009-03-31 Thread Stroller
On 31 Mar 2009, at 09:47, Daniel Pielmeier wrote: 2009/3/31 Stroller : I tried copying nmap-4.76.ebuild (the latest in the Portage tree) to /usr/local/portage/net-analyzer/nmap/nmap-4.85_beta5.ebuild and added the MY_P="${P/_beta/BETA}" line from http://bugs.gentoo.org/attachment.cgi?id=874

Re: [gentoo-user] Nmap 4.85BETA5 ebuild (Conficker scanning)

2009-03-31 Thread Daniel Pielmeier
2009/3/31 Stroller : > I tried copying nmap-4.76.ebuild (the latest in the Portage tree) to > /usr/local/portage/net-analyzer/nmap/nmap-4.85_beta5.ebuild and added the > MY_P="${P/_beta/BETA}" line from > http://bugs.gentoo.org/attachment.cgi?id=8748&action=view but I still get > "File nmap-4.85_be

[gentoo-user] Nmap 4.85BETA5 ebuild (Conficker scanning)

2009-03-31 Thread Stroller
Hi there, Nmap 4.85BETA5 can scan for Windows PC infected with Conficker, which goes live tomorrow. Does anyone have an ebuild for Nmap 4.85BETA5, please? I tried copying nmap-4.76.ebuild (the latest in the Portage tree) to / usr/local/portage/net-analyzer/nmap/nmap-4.85_beta5.ebuild and ad