Hi there,
Upgrading some packages today I saw:
Qt3 is deprecated and unsupported, both upstream and by the Gentoo Qt
Project. x11-libs/qt:3 will be removed from portage soon. See
http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_f988855f798764822704bbbd743ab6f7.xml
You are encouraged to use Qt4 instead.
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 8:59 AM, Stroller wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> Upgrading some packages today I saw:
>
> Qt3 is deprecated and unsupported, both upstream and by the Gentoo Qt
> Project. x11-libs/qt:3 will be removed from portage soon. See
>
> http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_f988855f7987
On Mittwoch 10 Februar 2010, Stroller wrote:
because qt-VERSION is being phased out. You are supposed to use the split qt
ebuilds. qt-VERSION is just a meta package.
And luckily, all qt-BLABLA-4.5.3 ebuilds are marked stable.
ALSO:
from the qt-4.5.3 ebuild:
KEYWORDS="~alpha amd64 arm hppa ~ia6
- Original Message
> From: Volker Armin Hemmann
> To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
> Sent: Wed, February 10, 2010 12:18:59 PM
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Qt3 deprecated, but Qt4 still not x86 (only
> ~x86)???
> ALSO:
> from the qt-4.5.3 ebuild:
>
> KEYW
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 8:59 AM, Stroller
wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> Upgrading some packages today I saw:
>
> Qt3 is deprecated and unsupported, both upstream and by the Gentoo Qt
> Project. x11-libs/qt:3 will be removed from portage soon. See
> http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_f988855f798764
On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 16:59:16 +, Stroller wrote:
> The message posted to Gentoo-dev suggests that Qt3 is going away right
> about NOW, but this doesn't seem to add up to what I'm seeing.
The message says it will be masked on Feb 21st and removed on March 21st.
So you have eleven days to add
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 9:33 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 16:59:16 +, Stroller wrote:
>
>> The message posted to Gentoo-dev suggests that Qt3 is going away right
>> about NOW, but this doesn't seem to add up to what I'm seeing.
>
> The message says it will be masked on Feb 21
On Mittwoch 10 Februar 2010, Mark Knecht wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 9:33 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> > On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 16:59:16 +, Stroller wrote:
> >> The message posted to Gentoo-dev suggests that Qt3 is going away right
> >> about NOW, but this doesn't seem to add up to what I'm se
On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 09:30:19 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
> I seem to have them both installed with only my old version of MYthTV
> requiring qt-3.3.8
That's easy then, switch to MythTV 0.22, it's much better :)
--
Neil Bothwick
I do not like this dumb machine
I really ought to sell it.
It never
On Mittwoch 10 Februar 2010, Mark Knecht wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 10:46 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> > On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 09:30:19 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
> >> I seem to have them both installed with only my old version of MYthTV
> >> requiring qt-3.3.8
> >
> > That's easy then, switch t
On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 10:20:09 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
> So am I at any great risk doing an emerge -C qt-3.3 and then expecting
> revdep-rebuild to fix up mythtv-0.21 with qt-4 using whatever it has
> ffor qt3-support?
>
> I'm __really__ not ready to upgrade my whole MythTV setup 0.22 if 0.21
> r
On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 11:19:37 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
> And I cannot update mythfrontend on my desktop machine without
> updating EVERY machine on the network to 0.22, so that's 2 desktops, 2
> dedicated machines hooked to TVs and the server. That's a lot of work
> just because someone decides th
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 10:46 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 09:30:19 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
>
>> I seem to have them both installed with only my old version of MYthTV
>> requiring qt-3.3.8
>
> That's easy then, switch to MythTV 0.22, it's much better :)
>
>
> --
> Neil Bothwick
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 11:47 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> Upgrading from 0.21 to 0.22 was painless AFAIR. I made a backup of the
> database but didn't need. You do need to upgrade all backends and
> frontends at the same time, but then it's just a matter of restarting
> them and you're OK. I did "e
On Wednesday 10 February 2010 19:22:01 BRM wrote:
> - Original Message
>
> > From: Volker Armin Hemmann
> > To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
> > Sent: Wed, February 10, 2010 12:18:59 PM
> > Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Qt3 deprecated, but Qt4 still n
On 10 Feb 2010, at 20:27, Alan McKinnon wrote:
...
The qt- subpackages are very much alive and stable:
$ eix qt-gui
[I] x11-libs/qt-gui
Available versions: (4) 4.5.3-r2 (~)4.6.1 **4.6.-r1[1]
**4.-
r1[1]
{+accessibility aqua cups dbus debug exceptions +glib gtk
+kde-qt m
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 11:40 AM, Volker Armin Hemmann
wrote:
>>
>> Again, I cannot see the 0.22 gives me anything I care about but
>> there's no way to know until I commit to making the change.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Mark
>
> if everything works, why are you even bothering with updates? Why do you car
On Donnerstag 11 Februar 2010, Mark Knecht wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 11:40 AM, Volker Armin Hemmann
> wrote:
>
>
> >> Again, I cannot see the 0.22 gives me anything I care about but
> >> there's no way to know until I commit to making the change.
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Mark
> >
> > if e
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 4:03 PM, Mark Knecht wrote:
> firefly ~ # emerge -pvg =x11-libs/qt-3.3.8b-r2
Ah, instead I should use
emerge --usepkg =x11-libs/qt-3.3.8b-r2
No errors or warnings.
Nice! Now Myth works no matter what happens in portage to qt...
Thanks,
Mark
On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 16:34:06 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
> emerge --usepkg =x11-libs/qt-3.3.8b-r2
>
> No errors or warnings.
>
> Nice! Now Myth works no matter what happens in portage to qt...
Except you won't get any updates to Qt is a security hole is discovered,
that's the main reason for addi
On Wednesday 10 February 2010 22:51:00 Stroller wrote:
> On 10 Feb 2010, at 20:27, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > ...
> > The qt- subpackages are very much alive and stable:
> >
> > $ eix qt-gui
> > [I] x11-libs/qt-gui
> >
> > Available versions: (4) 4.5.3-r2 (~)4.6.1 **4.6.-r1[1]
> >
> > **4
21 matches
Mail list logo
