Page 5-6 of a long udev thread is good reading on recent udev problems.
Robert
http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-355069-postdays-0-postorder-asc-start-100.html
On Monday 05 September 2005 10:51 am, Steve Evans wrote:
> On Monday 05 Sep 2005 15:31, Robert Crawford wrote:
> > I just had a simil
On Monday 05 September 2005 10:51 am, Steve Evans wrote:
> On Monday 05 Sep 2005 15:31, Robert Crawford wrote:
> > I just had a similar problem after I updated udev (I think). I run ~x86
> > systems, always kept current, so I expect a few minor hiccups, even
> > though I'm extremely careful with e
On Monday 05 Sep 2005 15:31, Robert Crawford wrote:
> I just had a similar problem after I updated udev (I think). I run ~x86
> systems, always kept current, so I expect a few minor hiccups, even though
> I'm extremely careful with etc-update. There seems to be some weird stuff
> going on with ude
On Monday 05 September 2005 09:56 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> thanks to all...
>
> i finally get the cdrom work, not perfectly though, i change
> the BIOS setting that use S-ATA only instead and keep P-ATA
> enabled, which makes cdrom the primary 1st, the sata drive
> recognized as primary third
thanks to all...
i finally get the cdrom work, not perfectly though, i change
the BIOS setting that use S-ATA only instead and keep P-ATA
enabled, which makes cdrom the primary 1st, the sata drive
recognized as primary third. (i hate such layout !! i prefer
the hard disk to be the primary first
> P-ATA only | S-ATA only | P-ATA & S-ATA etc and some others.
> i use a Native Mode, so that my disk can be recognized as /dev/hdaXX
> instead of /dev/sdaXX. and P-ATA only but with S-ATA enabled.
What's wrong about /dev/sdaX ? That's exactly how it should be. So
disable that strange "native-mod
i discover a something while examine my dmesg output.
-->Uniform Multi-Platform E-IDE driver Revision: 7.00alpha2
-->ide: Assuming 33MHz system bus speed for PIO modes; override with idebus=xx
-->Probing IDE interface ide0...
-->hda: ST380817AS, ATA DISK drive
-->Probing IDE interface ide1...
-->P
there are two items there:
ide-cdrom & ide-disk
but just empty directories. ??
On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 06:45:21PM +0100, Daniel Drake wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >i alway build it into kernel, i already checked my config file,
> >the "BLK_DEV_IDECD=y" is just there.
>
> Are you really rea
On Sat, 03 Sep 2005 18:19:37 +0800, danielhf wrote:
> i upgrade my system to use udev instead of previously known
> devfs, and leave the devfs option blank while configure the
> kernel, but recently, i found i could not mount my cdrom,
> there is no such device at all! the /dev/cdrom and the li
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i alway build it into kernel, i already checked my config file,
the "BLK_DEV_IDECD=y" is just there.
Are you really really sure? What do you have in /sys/bus/ide/drivers ?
Daniel
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
050903 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> my BIOS infomation shows my cdrom is at the third IDE primary,
> so i do: 'mknod -m 660 hde b 33 0' ...
What happened in that case ? That ought to be what you want.
> ... and later i tried 'mknod -m 660 hdc b 23 0'
> the output: "hdc is not a valid block device"
i did read that document, to find the doc is trivial.
what i got is just similar. the udev just create the device
files which were detected by kernel, and handle the operations
like add or remove dynamically. i tried this feature with my usb
devices already, i really like the way udev works. i cou
On Saturday 03 September 2005 08:20, Matt Randolph wrote:
> Alex Korshunov wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >> On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 08:32:56PM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >>
> >> no error on reboot now, but i will try to switch to windows to see
> >> if the cdrom works well
> >
>
yes, it works just well in WindowsXP.
it even works before i use udev. hehe
i'm not sure it failed due to the udev,
i have no idea now.
On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 09:20:42AM -0400, Matt Randolph wrote:
> Alex Korshunov wrote:
>
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> >>On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 08:32:56PM
my BIOS infomation shows my cdrom is at the third IDE primary,
so i do:
mknod -m 660 hde b 33 0
and later i tried
mknod -m 660 hdc b 23 0
the output:
hdc is not a valid block device
no luck. hde failed either, i give it up. ;-(
thanks for all help.
daniel
On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 04:53:57PM +
Alex Korshunov wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 08:32:56PM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
no error on reboot now, but i will try to switch to windows to see
if the cdrom works well
All my cdroms in /dev/cdroms/cdrom. May be...?
I didn't see the beginning of
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 08:32:56PM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
no error on reboot now, but i will try to switch to windows to see
if the cdrom works well
All my cdroms in /dev/cdroms/cdrom. May be...?
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 08:32:56PM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
no error on reboot now, but i will try to switch to windows to see
if the cdrom works well
> On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 02:07:34PM +0200, Sven K?hler wrote:
>
> i alway build it into kernel, i already checked my config file,
> t
On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 02:07:34PM +0200, Sven K?hler wrote:
i alway build it into kernel, i already checked my config file,
the "BLK_DEV_IDECD=y" is just there.
besides, why there is a register dump while i reboot,
the error occures at /etc/init.d/halt.sh right
after "Unmounting filesystems". h
> unfortunetly, hdc does not exist either.
> and dmesg does not show anything about my
> cdrom or hdc. just odd.
how about modprobe ide-cd ?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
20 matches
Mail list logo