Sergei Trofimovich writes:
> Hi Sebastián,
>
>> I've been thinking about switching from a rsync based tree to a git
>> based one cloning [0]. The main reasons because I would do that is in
>> order to save bandwidth (I've a slow GSM connection in my netbook and
>> I sync two other gentoo boxes fr
Am 03.08.2010 16:11, schrieb Michael Schreckenbauer:
> Am Dienstag, 3. August 2010, 08:31:38 schrieb Nikos Chantziaras:
>> On 08/03/2010 08:03 AM, Sebastián Ramírez Magrí wrote:
[...]
>>
>> Git needs to move much less data around than rsync. It only transfers
>> differences, not whole files.
>
>
Am 03.08.2010 14:52, schrieb Graham Murray:
> Nikos Chantziaras writes:
>
>> Git needs to move much less data around than rsync. It only transfers
>> differences, not whole files.
>
> But is uses a *lot* more disk space on the systems as each system
> contains the full history.
>
While your s
Am Dienstag, 3. August 2010, 08:31:38 schrieb Nikos Chantziaras:
> On 08/03/2010 08:03 AM, Sebastián Ramírez Magrí wrote:
> > Hi folks...
> >
> > I've been thinking about switching from a rsync based tree to a git
> > based one cloning [0]. The main reasons because I would do that is in
> > order
Nikos Chantziaras writes:
> Git needs to move much less data around than rsync. It only transfers
> differences, not whole files.
But is uses a *lot* more disk space on the systems as each system
contains the full history.
On 08/03/2010 08:03 AM, Sebastián Ramírez Magrí wrote:
Hi folks...
I've been thinking about switching from a rsync based tree to a git
based one cloning [0]. The main reasons because I would do that is in
order to save bandwidth (I've a slow GSM connection in my netbook and
I sync two other gen
6 matches
Mail list logo
