On Mon, 24 May 2010 04:11:45 -0700
walt wrote:
> On 05/23/2010 06:26 PM, David Relson wrote:
> > On Sun, 23 May 2010 11:01:53 -0700
> > walt wrote:
> >
> >> On 05/23/2010 09:56 AM, David Relson wrote:
> >>
> >>> Output of "emerge -d ant-junit" is attached, though I don't
> >>> understand what the
On 05/23/2010 06:26 PM, David Relson wrote:
On Sun, 23 May 2010 11:01:53 -0700
walt wrote:
On 05/23/2010 09:56 AM, David Relson wrote:
Output of "emerge -d ant-junit" is attached, though I don't
understand what the additional info means.
The 'build.log' should contain the actual error messa
On Sun, 23 May 2010 21:26:29 -0400
David Relson wrote:
> I found java-pkg_needs-vm in /usr/portage/eclass/java-utils-2.eclass.
> However "equery belongs /usr/portage/eclass/java-utils-2.eclass"
> doesn't find an owning package for this file. Do you have this file?
> What package owns it?
It's pa
On Sun, 23 May 2010 11:01:53 -0700
walt wrote:
> On 05/23/2010 09:56 AM, David Relson wrote:
>
> > Output of "emerge -d ant-junit" is attached, though I don't
> > understand what the additional info means.
>
> The 'build.log' should contain the actual error message following the
> test for the s
On 05/23/2010 09:56 AM, David Relson wrote:
Output of "emerge -d ant-junit" is attached, though I don't understand
what the additional info means.
The 'build.log' should contain the actual error message following the test
for the system-vm. The test code will look something like this:
+ java
On Sun, 23 May 2010 18:16:53 +0300
Arttu V. wrote:
> On 5/23/10, David Relson wrote:
> > Hi Arttu,
> >
> > The portage tree is fine, AFAICT. emerge finds the ebuild, but
> > the emerge fails. Removing "--jobs 4" doesn't change the result.
>
> Ok, then that could be discarded as just some wild
On 05/23/2010 07:57 AM, David Relson wrote:
The important failure line seems to be:
* Unable to determine VM for building from dependencies:
NV_DEPEND: dev-java/junit:0>=dev-java/java-config-2.1.9-r1
I'd suggest re-installing java-config-2 (just because), and then do
emerge -d ant-junit to
On 5/23/10, David Relson wrote:
> Hi Arttu,
>
> The portage tree is fine, AFAICT. emerge finds the ebuild, but
> the emerge fails. Removing "--jobs 4" doesn't change the result.
Ok, then that could be discarded as just some wild speculation.
Next idea, how about just marking a single arch:
>
On Sun, 23 May 2010 17:32:50 +0300
Arttu V. wrote:
> On 5/23/10, David Relson wrote:
> > "emerge -qv ant-junit" fails because ant-junit isn't found
>
> Is your portage tree or the underlying filesystem broken? You use eix,
> so what does "eix ant-junit" output? Are there really no versions of
>
On 5/23/10, David Relson wrote:
> "emerge -qv ant-junit" fails because ant-junit isn't found
Is your portage tree or the underlying filesystem broken? You use eix,
so what does "eix ant-junit" output? Are there really no versions of
ant-junit available on your system?
Also, from your b.g.o repo
Walt and Kenneth,
Your help with this problem is appreciated, though the problem still
persists.
What versions of java do you guys have installed? What does "eselect
java-vm list" show on your machines?
I'm on AMD64, what architectures are you running?
Looking around, /usr/bin/java is a symlin
On 05/22/2010 01:10 PM, David Relson wrote:
* Unable to determine VM for building from dependencies:
* Failed to determine VM for building.
Well, I've seen those error messages more than once. If I were
half-a-bottle more sober, I'm sure I could remember how I fixed
the problem.
Gentoo
12 matches
Mail list logo
