On Thursday 17 Nov 2011 06:53:29 Mick wrote:
> What started as a Firefox make error revealed an out of memory error.
> Since this is the first time ever that this old x86 laptop has developed
> such an ailment I am not sure what may be causing this? The error is
> repeatable.
>
> This is what dm
On 11/18/2011 07:42 PM, Mick wrote:
I've changed the title ever so slightly. I am getting an out of memory error
with kernel-2.6.39-gentoo-r3 too, so I can't blame it on the kernel.
The error as far as firefox is concerned is the same. Is this a firefox bug, or
is my decrepit old laptop incapa
On 11/19/2011 01:29 PM, Mick wrote:
On Saturday 19 Nov 2011 09:13:33 Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 11/18/2011 07:42 PM, Mick wrote:
I've changed the title ever so slightly. I am getting an out of memory
error with kernel-2.6.39-gentoo-r3 too, so I can't blame it on the
kernel.
The error as far
On Saturday 19 Nov 2011 09:13:33 Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> On 11/18/2011 07:42 PM, Mick wrote:
> > I've changed the title ever so slightly. I am getting an out of memory
> > error with kernel-2.6.39-gentoo-r3 too, so I can't blame it on the
> > kernel.
> >
> > The error as far as firefox is conc
On Nov 19, 2011 6:31 AM, "Mick" wrote:
>
> On Saturday 19 Nov 2011 09:13:33 Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> > On 11/18/2011 07:42 PM, Mick wrote:
> > > I've changed the title ever so slightly. I am getting an out of
memory
> > > error with kernel-2.6.39-gentoo-r3 too, so I can't blame it on the
> > >
On Nov 19, 2011 7:28 PM, "Michael Mol" wrote:
- >8 snip
> And, finally, yeah..that isn't just "not much", that's a terribly small
amount of memory. Assuming you've kept the software current, some of your
applications have certainly not been maintained with 600MB of system memory
in mind.
>
Am Samstag 19 November 2011, 14:42:07 schrieb Nikos Chantziaras:
> On 11/19/2011 01:29 PM, Mick wrote:
> > On Saturday 19 Nov 2011 09:13:33 Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> >> On 11/18/2011 07:42 PM, Mick wrote:
> >>> I've changed the title ever so slightly. I am getting an out of
> >>> memory
> >>> err
On Saturday 19 Nov 2011 15:57:58 Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> Am Samstag 19 November 2011, 14:42:07 schrieb Nikos Chantziaras:
> > On 11/19/2011 01:29 PM, Mick wrote:
> > > On Saturday 19 Nov 2011 09:13:33 Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> > >> On 11/18/2011 07:42 PM, Mick wrote:
> > >>> I've changed the
On Saturday, 19. November 2011 20:08:36 Pandu Poluan wrote:
> > On Nov 19, 2011 7:28 PM, "Michael Mol" wrote:
> > And, finally, yeah..that isn't just "not much", that's a terribly small
> > amount of memory. Assuming you've kept the software current, some of your
> > applications have certainly no
On Saturday 19 Nov 2011 17:37:59 Hans Müller wrote:
> On Saturday, 19. November 2011 20:08:36 Pandu Poluan wrote:
> > > On Nov 19, 2011 7:28 PM, "Michael Mol" wrote:
> > > And, finally, yeah..that isn't just "not much", that's a terribly small
> > > amount of memory. Assuming you've kept the softw
Mick wrote:
It seems that with time applications are getting bigger than what they
used to be.
It shouldn't just seem that way, they are.
Dale
:-) :-)
--
I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how
you interpreted my words!
11 matches
Mail list logo
