+1 It bit me, and just seems stupid.
+1
I like Neil's suggestion - eselect can put packages it knows about into a
specially-named set.
I've logged the bug;
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=367611
Based on the quality of Neil's posts i'm sure you're right, but i'll leave
the devs
Apparently, though unproven, at 04:13 on Thursday 12 May 2011, Kevin O'Gorman
did opine thusly:
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 4:53 PM, Adam Carter adamcart...@gmail.com wrote:
Apparently so. It seems like it ought to pay attention to eselect.
If I've explicitly configured my system to use
On 2011-05-11, Grant Edwards grant.b.edwa...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2011-05-10, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
Apparently so. It seems like it ought to pay attention to eselect.
If I've explicitly configured my system to use 2.6 instead of 2.7,
removing 2.6 doesn't seem like a good
Apparently so. It seems like it ought to pay attention to eselect.
If I've explicitly configured my system to use 2.6 instead of 2.7,
removing 2.6 doesn't seem like a good thing...
Sounds to me like that should be made into a feature request. What does the
list think? If there's support
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 4:53 PM, Adam Carter adamcart...@gmail.com wrote:
Apparently so. It seems like it ought to pay attention to eselect.
If I've explicitly configured my system to use 2.6 instead of 2.7,
removing 2.6 doesn't seem like a good thing...
Sounds to me like that should be
On 2011-05-10, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 16:40 on Tuesday 10 May 2011, Grant Edwards
did opine thusly:
I ran emerge --depclean the other day on one of my machines and it
removed Python 2.6. I was using Python 2.6 as my default python,
and
Apparently, though unproven, at 17:13 on Tuesday 10 May 2011, Grant Edwards
did opine thusly:
I think the issue happens because portage does not take eselect
choices into account when building it's dep graph, it only uses the
DEPENDS in ebuilds.
Apparently so. It seems like it ought to
On 2011-05-10, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 17:13 on Tuesday 10 May 2011, Grant Edwards
did opine thusly:
I think the issue happens because portage does not take eselect
choices into account when building it's dep graph, it only uses the
On Tue, 10 May 2011 16:07:24 + (UTC), Grant Edwards wrote:
Perhaps having eselect add currently selected slots to the world file
would be sufficient?
Not the world file, that would be horrible, but they could be added to a
spacial set.
--
Neil Bothwick
Three kinds of people: Those who
On Tuesday 10 May 2011 16:13:41 Grant Edwards wrote:
On 2011-05-10, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 16:40 on Tuesday 10 May 2011, Grant
Edwards
did opine thusly:
I ran emerge --depclean the other day on one of my machines and it
removed
On 2011-05-10, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
Apparently so. It seems like it ought to pay attention to eselect.
If I've explicitly configured my system to use 2.6 instead of 2.7,
removing 2.6 doesn't seem like a good thing...
I am not sure I understand:
If you eselect python 2.7
11 matches
Mail list logo
